Are we there yet?
26.02.2026 16:13
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 2
Are we there yet?
The UK government is proposing radical and punitive changes to settlement rules. This is settlement, not citizenship. The consultation is open until 12 February; please respond to it and oppose these evil proposals. Amnesty have a good guide: www.amnesty.org.uk/resources/gu...
Help get the Scottish Greens on TV www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/help-get-t...
Man holds phone recording ICE before being killed
He was holding a phone not a gun, his crime? Opposing the regime. So they murdered him.
“Since you didn’t give me a peace prize I declare war on you” is the ultimate “you called me racist too many times, now I am racist”
what kind of response would a NATO country expect if a non NATO country stated their intent to invade?
I'd think they should expect the same level of response or a heightened response to a NATO country doing the same
so what do the countries of NATO think they are part of & why are they bothering
excerpt from https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/SexualOrientation/IESOGI/Reports_on_Gender_Final_Summary.pdf which reads "Financing the anti-gender movement A recent report concluded that the financial architecture behind a so-called global “anti-gen- der” movement is comprised of wealthy individ- uals, non-profit organizations, and religious in- stitutions. Funding is funnelled through private donations, contributions through non-profit charitable foundations, and financial spon- sorships of projects and events that coalesce around the defence of a “natural” order, includ- ing legal strategies to fight non-discrimination policies that include protection based on SOGI. The aggregate revenue of US-based organiza- tions associated with the anti-gender move- ment from 2008 to 2017 was US$6.2 billion; and at least $1 billion was funnelled into countries across the globe. The report concluded that, globally, funding for the anti-gender move- ments at least triples the funding destined to projects and events that promote the human rights of LGBTI persons.1 1 “Meet the Moment”, Global Philantropy Project: https://globalphilanthropyproject. org/meet-the-moment/ "
what they say when they go full mask off, telling a cis woman sharing a unwomens declaration for IDAHOBIT ... to "women were here first. You fuck off you rapey creeps." you've zero clue tom. I don't argue/discuss/debate with them anymore as its totally pointless as they display zero logic, just pure hatred of trans people and most of the time also gay people and anyone different from them, disgusting behaviour usually masked via religion or just safety for women and children "concerns" even when half the time they are abusing women and children via their actions. ignorance is bliss huh tom, you do you but don't say it wasn't explained to you by everyone in this thread umpteen times so at this point YOU are CHOOSING ignorance.
they call for cis men to go into toilets with guns if they think a trans woman is there, you think its all about cis safety??? they see trans people as not human and want rid of them ByAnyMeans, Tom you need to shut up or become way less ignorant of what has been happening for the last 15+ years
#BatSignal
Please share this widely. There have been 13 peer-reviewed critiques of the Cass Review, to the extent that academia regards it as pseudoscience, but so far all have been subject to organised censorship by mainstream media. This is the first time one has broken through. Oz Guardian only still.
they can't claim to be impartial!
they do not even record evidence from a protected group whilst continually quoting a small bunch of bigots who are not any kind of protected group, there is no balancing of rights happening at all, they simply collude with bigots to only show their distorted views
A transphobic pressure group is trying to ban trans women from Hampstead women’s pond – we’re fighting back goodlawproject.org/s/4860b3
Sub Guy DC's Sean Dunn After Beating the Wrap
11/06/2025 Washington DC
hope they were given a deadline to reply by , I don't understand why it needed to be removed until they've replied either way , look forward to reading it once its back and your next article too.
Trans rights is a winning platform. Pro immigration is a winning platform. Taxing the rich is a winning platform. Affordable housing is a winning platform. Free childcare is a winning platform. Hating Andrew Cuomo is a winning platform. SOCIALISM IS A WINNING PLATFORM
📺 🗯️ NEW 🗯️ 📺
Ofcom’s decision not to investigate TalkTV’s grotesque commentary on trans rights is a dereliction of duty 👇
https://goodlaw.social/4wvh
white leaflet with black text reading, "Dear transphobes, do you think it's right to harass people int the street?Right to push transgender people around in clubs? Right to humiliate, intimidate and threaten them online? Well we don't. That's why if we see you doing harm, we're reporting you. We believe people should be allowed to be themselves. Except if they're spreading hate. Yours, Scotland Hate crime. Report it to stop it." has logos of Police Scotland and Safer Scotland at the bottom and the url onescotland.org
so much for their past campaigns absolutely useless policing, "keeping the peace" by allowing intimidation by bigots, so sorry you had to endure that Sophie 🫂
Every major medical association and leading world health authority supports health care for transgender people and youth.
Here are excerpts from 30+ organizations’ statements ⤵️
glaad.org/medical-asso...
and the monitoring of the judgment was therefore closed prematurely in 2011. Lord Hodge gave a press interview on 12 September to the Times in which he admitted that the effect of the FWS case was that trans people had never had the rights they were led to believe by the State to have had.
that the Equality Act was written in 2010 to refer to sex as 'biological sex', leading to ongoing violations of transgender people's Article 8 privacy rights that the Goodwin judgment set out to protect. As such, the UK has never been in compliance with the judgment,
“Orlando had become a woman… Their change of sex, though it altered their future, did nothing whatever to alter their identity… but in future we must, for convention’s sake, say ‘her’ for ‘his’ and ‘she’ for ‘he’.”
Virginia Woolf having no problems with pronouns in 1928.
#InternationalPronounsDay
Have a look at TransActual's helpful pronouns guide to understand more about pronouns, and why people share them, this International Pronouns Day! 🏳️⚧️
Here we go! 📝📝📝
🚽 Scrap the Bathroom Ban🚨🏳️⚧️
Our work so far is already working (see here: archive.ph/gaCN4)
Now we’re demanding that any new Code must outline how providers can lawfully *include* trans folk in their services.
✍️ Write to your MP with our easy tool: actionnetwork.org/letters/scra...
@zackpolanski.bsky.social is asked about the Home Secretarys comments that yesterdays protests about Israels actions were dishonourable (she also said they were unBritish).
Zack is spot on.
Join the General Strike US and prepare your community to strike back!
3.5%
@generalstrikeus.bsky.social
