Wurst of Luck

Democracy dies in darkness, Journalism dies in the boardroom.

Never forget, behind the balaclava of every 2A paramilitary LARPer is this:

Every keyboard warrior and pundit that was outraged about every mention of Charlie Kirk that wasn’t sympathetic and paint him a saint, yet is indifferent to AND blames Alex Pretti for his murder by the goon-squad… you sound ridiculous, and you never get to call anyone out for their responses again.

Something about this show blows.

This show will definitely blow.

What plays in my head when I wake up and realize Trump is still president.

Take this poll to stop Newsmax from putting another selective statistic out into the political ecosystem:

Suggestion to the next president of the United States: replace Trump’s official portrait with a Polaroid of an empty suit and hang it in an undisclosed White House bathroom.

Here’s the creepiest ad I’ve seen in awhile. Is this guy threatening to cut people’s dicks off?

www.facebook.com/watch/?v=202...

Can we all make an agreement to start calling Donald Trump, President QVC instead of DJT?

Ryan Walters resigned to head a MAGA interests group to try to destroy teacher’s unions. My hope is Oklahoma will take this chance to appoint a new superintendent of schools that actually believes in education and not religious indoctrination.

Tried to get a Covid booster today. I was told by the pharmacy my insurance wouldn’t approve it without prior authorization from my PCP. Despite having dialated cardiomyopathy, I’m having to jump through hoops to get that thing our HHS Secretary said anyone would still be able to get.

WWJD? Not what Kilmeade said on Foxnews

"It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment".

-Charlie Kirk

holy war. The letter was truly the ramblings of a madman couched in the language Sunday School wisdom. Stay safe out there, don’t accept the proposition Charlie Kirk is suddenly good just because his death was tragic, and hopefully we can stagger through this latest crisis relatively unscathed.

So my congressman sent out a letter confusingly talking about giving more power to the government, simultaneously speaking about limited government being the goal. He also attempts to martyrize Kirk while talking about God’s love driving out Satan.

Sitting politicians are angling for a domestic

Charlie Kirk. Keep a clear head, don’t let yourself be baited, and never forget that horrible things can happen to horrible people.

evan if they win the fight. But what if your oppent only wants to argue in order to pick a fight? If one side is acting in bad faith, then it isn’t an argument or a fight, it’s a trap.

Let’s not fall into the traps that will surely be laid in the days ahead surrounding the life and murder of

their passions and feel empathy for their opponents. However, I fear this will only cement most of them in their extremist “who is to blame” worldview even more.

A mentor of mine often said, the first person to resort to threats or violence in an argument, is the person who lost the argument

fear of an assassin’s bullet for simply speaking their mind. I refuse to praise anything about the public persona of Charlie Kirk, because it was a terrible use of a middling intellect that will affect world politics for decades to come. I hope that his successors and followers will learn to cool

worshipped his ability to “own the libs”, as they were hiss biggest contribution to discourse; baseless accusations that turned complex issue analysis into a team sport (even more than his predecessors like Limbaugh).

It saddens an worries me that Kirk or any human being has to die or live in

college students in the US in live campus debates for click bait, but often shied away from debating experts on major topics. He used inflammatory language and showmanship to build a following around a carefully crafted persona. Those that saw through him were frustrated with his fans that

public discourse, and made many young people see political issues as essential battles for the survival of their race or religion. He wasn’t the first, but he was unique in his unapologetic, win arguments at all cost style that often floundered in the face of real debate. He chose to “destroy”