Fed serie om ny(ere) dansk rap bl.a fortalt af @magnuskraft.bsky.social og @akatba.bsky.social www.dr.dk/drtv/episode...
Fed serie om ny(ere) dansk rap bl.a fortalt af @magnuskraft.bsky.social og @akatba.bsky.social www.dr.dk/drtv/episode...
👀
we're regressing on sexism issues and Igbt issues Replying to [redacted] Sex positivity is good, actually. Replying NOT WITH FICTIONAL CHARACTERS Replying Why? Replying: Because they don't have agency Replying When two charactets have sex in a story, do you consider that sexual coercion? Because they are being forced by the writer? Replying to unironically yes. unless you are writing something based on your own personal experience and your fictional character is a fictionalised version of yourself, then yes I see it that way.
FICTIONAL SEX IS COERCIVE BECAUSE CHARACTERS ARE FORCED INTO IT BY AUTHORS I AM SCREAMING
Come on over to bsky.
We got dril.
We got a girl who draws clocks.
We got a kinky salamander.
We got a guy who's hornt for big noses.
We got a contraption.
We got a domme mod who runs the contraption.
We got cookie sexpest.
We got Tom servo sexpest.
We got corn father sex pest.
“Jeg vælter ind i Bluesky, pisse fuld og ubehagelig / Jeg skaber mig og råber op og skriger som var det dommedag /
Jeg lugter af gammel sved og snaps med kommensmag / Jeg rusker dig rundt og kysser dig på munden / Skriver posts ud i flæng, falder i søvn og vågner på Twitter”
Merde.
Er det her det høflige Twitter?