Trading 212 have, and possibly still do, advertise on GB News.
10.03.2026 22:20
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Trading 212 have, and possibly still do, advertise on GB News.
Fall forward?
It's true, the revolting piece of shite.
www.theguardian.com/politics/201...
Nothing would surprise me about this ars*hole anymore, but is this a genuine quote? Is there a source?
We’ve put together a starter pack of alternative media outlets. Follow these to get a different take on the news. 👇
Thank goodness it's Starmer at the wheel during this crisis, and not some nutter such as Johnson, who wouldn't even have turned up to the cobra meeting.
Dropbox?
This is either hyperbole or you've lost it.
The fucking Daily Mail is a complete piece of racist fucking shit. Sorry about that outburst, but I do feel a tad better now.
A great result, I'm glad Hannah won. But gloating is not an adult look Zack, and it may be off-putting for many, and it may come back to bite you.
I think we should be explicit about this sort of thing - not everyone watches Panorama.
7. Stop charging RNLI to use Duchy beaches to launch lifeboats?
Our latest tactical voting advice to stop Reform:
stopreformuk.vote/parl/gorton-...
Parliamentary by-election 26th Feb 2026
🟢 Gorton & Denton = GREEN
#Manchester #ByElection
These two women are suing Andrew Tate, alleging he raped them. Here they visit the social media companies that created Tate. Please share.
*one voice altered to disguise identity
I guess this semi-random collection of words makes sense to you.
RefUK made a stupid fuss, as is their way, about a common sense proposal. ‘Legal advice’ is not the same as illegal - again, not wasting loads of time and taxpayers’ money was probably behind the decision. And you think Starmer himself should have been leafing through the legal details?
Zilch to do with Starmer, but The Scum knows that. Councils about to be reorganised applied for delays to avoid them having to have a second election in quick succession. It's about not wasting everyone's time and saving taxpayers' money.
Why do wankers like this get to platform their rancid world view? What's his qualification to do it, residing in Monaco?
Farage's mate
No joke: I got angry hate mail today for writing an obituary of a Black woman scientist—because the person felt she did didn’t deserve the recognition.
Which just makes me want to share it again: www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Owning a mistake and apologising for it goes a long way. When else has a PM done that?
Not where Kuenssberg has anything to do with it.
The state of our news media is laughable. Until/if that is addressed we will never have something we can reliably call democracy, in spite of any changes or tweaks that might be made to the electoral system.
Starmer could just change the electoral system is possibly the maddest thing I've seen for a while. A referendum on it was not even in the last Labour manifesto (although I wish it had been).
Something not done within the first 18 months is not a broken promise Zack, as you well know. Be better please.
'lost leadership of Andy Burnham'? The bloke who legged it when he lost the leadership election, instead of standing by the Labour Party, thereby helping consign us to the worst Tory Government in living memory? No thanks.
bsky.app/profile/bpsm...
Starmer did it? Really?
What on earth is so appealing about Burnham all of a sudden? People seem to be losing their minds over a mediocre politician, who ran away at the first sign of trouble, and whose ego now wants back in. He's clearly only out for himself, and it looks like the selection panel saw that.
The Labour Party, I'm going on about the Labour Party. Burnham undermined it, thereby helping consign us to the worst Tories in history. Now his ego wants back, and in the process creating division and disruption? He's only out for himself, surely you can see that? The Labour version of Johnson.
