was this the article you were looking for?
time.com/3532014/wome...
20.02.2026 00:56
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
was this the article you were looking for?
time.com/3532014/wome...
MTG: “This is what many in MAGA thought they voted to end.
Boy were we wrong.”
Fascism
“Housing shortage – Jews to blame," letter sticker, German Reich, 1938
zwangsraeume.berlin/en/context
screenshot of a mozilla blog post that shows: “We’re building a better browser, not an agenda We see a lot of promise in AI browser features making your online experience smoother, more helpful, and free from the everyday disruptions that break your flow. But browsers made by AI companies ask you to make a hard choice — either use AI all the time or don’t use it at all.”
no, @mozilla.org you’re indeed building an agenda, and it’s not even an original, but one copied from others.
i would love to know where you see all that promise in AI other than your pockets, and where you see that the AI is not itself the “disruption that breaks [your user’s] flow”
True comedy is watching Dave Portnay trying to use a hammer
“Grab him by the list…”
Isn’t the “Hitler sucks” wing the one Trump is demolishing?
Last year, CNN ran a “fact check” of Kamala HQ that claimed we were lying for saying Trump’s plan is Project 2025.
Now Trump is outright admitting it’s his plan.
Legacy media failed the country.
During the removal, parts of the statue were broken and President Trump and Jeffrey Epstein’s hands were no longer joined. But the statue appeared fully restored on Thursday, with only minor damage and the hands once again clasped together. https://wapo.st/3VMSCKU
Though the only reason we are here is because senators, including some in that room, voted to confirm him despite his anti-science record and his admission that a worm ate part of his brain. My anger at that is limitless.
they want to specifically kill some (many) of us because they think america doesn’t have enough future resources for all. it’s all the making of FAIR, those who are now part of the Project 2025
it’s here in the very first paragraph: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federat...
it was retitled that in 1981, so the one #1 in ‘77 was STAR WARS and he’s right and they’re not!
indeed, it’s all in good old Godhardt's Law: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure"
exactly. they’re like “personas” were supposed to be: a tool to keep the attention on the right place—users.
sorry, i did not mean it to be about the framework.
it’s always about the team. a great team with good guardrails and good objectives will do wonders with prob any framework, and a misguided team with short-term, tactical minds will wreck it even with a good one.
it’s not the framework.
“if you say you understand economics, and you’re not a socialist, you haven’t understood economics”
— Someone smarter than I, somewhere.
yes, i see your point, and it’s a valid one. and i also think that if everyone make it their job to have a better product, from research to qa, it is much less probable that these mistakes get to the light, and also more probable that the product/service is the best it can be.
in my experience, teams that end up effectively applying any sort of framework like these also have a solid or evolving set of product values that support a good interpretation of the results in context—specifically not letting it go rotten by the metric becoming the goal.
/4
it also—like most measurable frameworks—might backfire by putting attention on the metric, while taking it from the user. not for nothing we have heaps of products with toxic addictiveness (Engagement), a pervasive focus on design systems and cute UI (Happiness)…
/3
so they give you a sense of righteousness only because some users align with your offer but usually hinders you from knowing more on how your offer could better align to to your user needs
/2
now talking seriously, the issues i found is that these methods measure the experience your current users get from your offer (product/service), but they hide the delta between your offer and the user needs
/1
considering that in common law, the body of law is defined by precedent derived from judicial decisions, aren’t then the judges who create the laws by interpreting acts and preceding future rulings?
don’t we then have only two powers, with the “legislative” being just a group of “influencers”?
"Wait, it's all just Gamergate?"
isn’t that the same price approach that google and apple have?
the reckoning will come* when they have to service their bugs, or maintain/update their code, or honor the legal suits from their users…
(*or so i hope)
he prob meant he “absolved” himself from 6 wars…
