A shocking number of people responding to this video clearly did not watch the video. David is extremely opposed to the Trump administration's terrorization of immigrant communities. He is describing serious problems with the current laws which make accountability difficult.
Meaningful move down in Trump approval on Civiqs. -20 today had been hovering at -18 for awhile.
We have actual fiscal constraints. I'm not saying Democrats should run on raising taxes for middle class and upper middle class people but...at some point we need revenue to do things that are good and this tax revolt shit is terrible.
I really can't get over these quotes from @booker.senate.gov "The Democratic Party has got to get its act together and stop thinking that if a whole idea comes forward, it means all the other important things don’t get done." In fact this is what it means in this space!
The downweighting links decision more than anything else just destroyed the site.
This is really stupid and poorly thought out and eroding the tax base is terrible policy. You might as well announce the cutting social security act at this point.
Ok so it's possible but also if TSMC can't make chips...
Yes. So much of the practice includes a lot of repetitive tasks that I can speed up now. My best guess is that it's actually gotten better on the substantive stuff and time spent with clients guiding them.
Well I have been able to cut the time spent on an average case significantly as a person who represents plaintiffs so it connects in that sense
I mean I think they should have! But also Democrats are definitely going to impeach Trump again and didn't impeach Bush so that was different.
Democrats win 53 Senate seats and 270 House seats and McConnell, Young, Thune, et al start looking around and wondering what they're saving? There is some space for a cascade in GOP at that point I think.
This means something like $4-$4.10 a gallon
Before this war Democrats had a 40% chance at taking the Senate. Up to 44% now. This is nonsense. If gas prices get to and stay at $5 I'd say 53 seats is more likely than 50.
Score one for Joel bsky.app/profile/cono...
Funny you should ask, @conorsen.bsky.social and I were having this conversation.
My actual hope is that AI can help actual lawyers create a world where we have civil Gideon as a reality and then maybe there is both a requirement for an attorney and for the provision of one.
I think the law from the NY Senate seemed really bad and overbroad and had real first amendment issues. Also think that while AI powered pro se litigants are a problem, non-AI powered pro se litigants are also a problem (in a different way).
Got my Odd Lots hat on, ready for futures to open.
Yeah that’s not unlike the championship in England. Haji Wright makes about one million a year.
Population of countries in big 5 soccer leagues in Europe is about the same as the US and there are 98 top flight teams with about 25 players each. Honestly NFL and college top flight might get closer on economics.
This is an incredibly Indiana brained take.
I feel like Trump impeachment and removal scenarios in 2027 continue to be underpriced. It’s all it will never happen they’re too afraid and MAGA until JD Vance works with some senators to snake him after an impeachment and Trump is at 29% approval and they all want to move on.
One crazy thing is that while Democrats only flipped 4 senate seats (and got to 61 but solid south was still real) they nearly got to 65 and lost 4 very close races. Meanwhile they won the house popular vote by 17 a swing of 11 points from 1972.
Reading the Wikipedia about the 1974 elections for no particular reason.
Right. I sort of imagine the Rbob to retail spread grows with non energy inflation at pretty consistent rates since it’s like labor, goods, land etc that makes up the cost structure of retail and distribution.
Rbob plus 1.10 basically no?
In nominal terms it’s already the most expensive gas has ever been under Trump by a good amount. In real terms there was a period in 2018 that was more expensive.
Fire on manhattan bridge fucked up a number of them that wasn’t great
Obviously it would be horrible for spurs but the Lehman analogy is bad. Spurs are like the least leveraged big club in the world.
i.e. I agree insofar as it weakens that will be because we're in recession not a cause of
