Injured players fully count towards the cap at all time no matter what so Laine is already included in the cap hit of the team
Injured players fully count towards the cap at all time no matter what so Laine is already included in the cap hit of the team
Usually, teams spend all their cap space because placing a player on LTI so the ACSL is very close to the cap.
Montreal have a bad ACSL. Itβs more than a million away from 95.5M.
Maybe they simply have to go under the cap, not under their ACSL
When a team place their first player on LTI, their salary cap is no longer 95.5M. Their new salary cap is called ACSL. To calculate it, itβs the salary minus the cap space they had at the time of the placement.
When the team is over their ACSL, they are using LTI space even if they are under 95.5M
Usually, the ACSL is very close to the salary cap so when a team stop using LTI, they are usually below their ACSL.
Both possibilities would make sense because the ACSL is only there for the time a team have players on LTI.
I will add that, as far I know, teams have to be under their ACSL to activate their final player. However, the CBA doesnβt say anything about it and itβs rare to see a team with a bad ACSL.
Maybe Iβm wrong and maybe they are OK to activate him without any moves
Usually, the ACSL is very close to the salary cap so when a team stop using LTI, they are usually below their ACSL.
Both possibilities would make sense because the ACSL is only there for the time a team have players on LTI.
I will add to all of this that, as far I know, teams have to be under their ACSL to activate their final player. However, the CBA doesnβt say anything about it and itβs rare to see a team with a bad ACSL.
Maybe Iβm wrong and maybe they are OK to activate him without any moves
Montreal is not under the cap. Their team cap hit is currently 97.25M.
Newhook could be placed on LTI or Montreal could loan 2 players to Laval to activate Dach. Montreal would be below the cap.
If Laine is ready to return, they will need to loan 2 players anyway.
Itβs PuckPedia version of CapFriendlyβs Armchair GM. On mobile, you need to press on the three bars to open the menu. PuckGM is at the bottom of the menu.
Testing moves and seeing by yourself what happens can definitely help some people instead of simply reading a few numbers.
CapFriendly had their LTI summary which was helpful to follow the cap situation. The current cap space was also 0$ when a team was using LTI space.
Todays Cap Hit - LTI Usage = ACSL
99Β 838Β 424- 18Β 338Β 758 = 81Β 499Β 666
PuckGM can help. MTL is displayed with -427k of projected cap space in PuckGM.
To activate Dach, they will need to get back below their ACSL first. Loaning Bolduc and waiving Veleno/Blais would clear enough cap space.
After activating Dach, their salary cap will return to 95.5M. This is not the case right now.
PuckPedia is not perfect when a team use LTI. They donβt display ACSL for example.
Itβs a bit clearer in PuckGM and even then, thereβs a disclaimer that the cap space may vary slightly.
Montreal lost around 1.5M of cap space when they were placed on LTI.
They donβt have the cap room. Their annual team cap hit is at 97.246M. They need to be below 95.5M to activate him.
Activating Evans decrease how much they could their team cap hit could raise. This is why Fowler and Beck were sent down.
They will also have to send down 2 players to activate Dach.
Yep, thatβs right. If we simplify how LTI works, it simply allows you to exceed the cap during the time of the injury if you have no cap space left.
A bit like using a credit card if you donβt have enough in your bank account
Injured players fully count against the cap at all time. LTI doesnβt remove the cap hit of the player
Any games played under an emergency recall count towards the 10/30. Days on emergency recall doesnβt count towards the 10/30.
Games played under a regular recall doesnβt count toward the 10GP for emergency recall
Yes, it doesnβt start over. This is what CapFriendly had too.
PuckPedia disagrees. I will ask a NHL source to make sure.
It begins at the time he is re-claimed. Itβs exactly like if he would have clears waivers in October and would have been recalled for the first time in December
Effectivement. Cela a le mΓͺme effet que si Blais nβavais pas Γ©tΓ© rΓ©clamΓ© en Octobre et que le Canadien venait simplement de rappeler Blais.
Il est exempt du ballotage pour la mΓͺme pΓ©riode de temps quβhabituellement.
It would only be true if itβs a conditioning loan which would require to activate him. If itβs a LTI conditioning loan, itβs 3 games or 6 days. They can also ask for a 2 games extension if it wasnβt enough to see if he is fit to return.
And yes, I understand it better than you. You donβt understand that thereβs no 30 days or games period.
The player arrives on the NHL roster and the team has the choice to send him down or not. Carolina sent him down.
Thatβs incorrect. Thereβs no 30 days, 31 days, 10 games or anything.
If Toronto placed him on waivers at any point of the season, if Carolina was claiming him and were the only team to claim, they had the ability to send him down without waivers.
Itβs not automatic either.
Because LTI have nothing to do with the playoffs.
Placing a player on LTI allows you to exceed the cap if you have no cap space left. Vegas had 0$ of cap space when the season started. The only way for them to replace Stone is to place him on LTI
No, it doesnβt give more money to the Habs. He is not on LTI. It would hurt them to place him on LTI.
Montreal is losing cap space because of his injury, not the opposite
No, they are not credited with the league average salary.
When a player is placed on LTI, his entire cap hit is added to the LTI pool. However, if it exceeds the league average salary, the amount is capped to the league average salary.
Thanks! Iβm doing well, hope itβs the same for you!
Yep, based on what Portzline said, PuckPediaβs projection should be right. Fedotov should be in the AHL this season.
He would have to go through waivers and 1.15M would be removed from his cap hit while he is in the AHL.
Because itβs illegal. It would have been a clear cap case of cap circumvention