I illustrated it. All. Multidimensionally. Using various accepted rules, tools and conjectures. If I publish it, it will not be through achedemic channels without assistance. I do not intend to share any of it online before publication. Help.
I illustrated it. All. Multidimensionally. Using various accepted rules, tools and conjectures. If I publish it, it will not be through achedemic channels without assistance. I do not intend to share any of it online before publication. Help.
237 pages of mathematical theory in three blue and one brown, notebooks.
237 pages of handwritten mathematical theory in @3blue1brown.com notebooks. I find that intriguing, as I didn't know you existed until today. I did the theory on purpose, but not the grabbing of random notebooks. That's coincidental.
Mr. Grant Sanderson, I just discovered your YT channel because I've been working on a theory of my own as a personal project, and someone recommended this video. I'm five steps ahead of you. Who do I talk to about it?
Mr. Grant Sanderson, I just discovered your YT channel because I've been working on a theory of my own as a personal project, and someone recommended this video. I'm five steps ahead of you. Who do I talk to about it?
I'll look into both. Thanks for the recommend
Call me crazy if you want to. I set aside an art project to do math!
The cause of Least Action is not a straight line. βοΈ
Appreciate your taking the time to reply anyway. Thanks π
*collar
I know it sounds ridiculous. It is a tad ridiculous. I'm an artist and philosopher, autodidact, polymath, who collects camels.
I am Not a mathematician.
Nevertheless, I have a proof which will require a mathematician or theoretical physicist to review.
So I'm putting this out there.
Ten years, six months and 139 pages later...
I think I have either broken math or solved physics... I have a proof.
And now I need Help!
@chanda.blacksky.app
@drdind.bsky.social
@drklassen.bsky.social
@noisyastronomer.com
@physgal.bsky.social
@hankgreen.bsky.social
@spahn711.bsky.social
There is nothing more surreal in our current reality than watching AI bots fight one another in the comments section over their artificial perception of the state of human affairs in our current reality.
π€¦ββοΈ People who think critical thinking means being critical of those doing the thinking π€ π
AI chatbots do Not generate Answers.
They generate text that vaguely resemble answers.
Colar piece for my current couture fiber art fashion design.
I once saw a fly catch a spider, and drag it's ass away.
Take from that what you will.
I just set my Bingo card on fire. π₯
If Qin Shi Haung, the First Emperor of China, was entombed with an army, acrobats, birds, chariots and rivers of mercury... Might he also have entomed a library? I wonder.
Taking the time to remind myself of all my reasons for joy, gratitude and hope.
I could say more, but it would be a lot of swearing.
YouTube is secretly using AI to edit people's videos
β’ Skin is being smoothed or sharpened
β’ Features like ears are being altered
β’ YouTube confirmed there's an 'experiment' on Shorts to 'unblur' and 'improve' clarity
β’ There's currently no way to opt out
(via BBC)
Everyone participates in society. Whether they like it or not, whether they want to improve it or not. There is no such thing as independent autonomy from society. An intelligent person would recognize that.
I am perfectly prepared to discuss various topics and subjects. But I don't argue. And certainly Not from a place of ego, thinking I've already won the argument and therefore every other perspective on the topic is inevitablely stupid.
Ha. I could unpack that in a heartbeat. First by pointing out that philosophies grow and change based on context, independent of their origins. But you're not actually interested in discussing the topic itself in various contexts. You just want to feel superior for debunking the origin.
I've done a ten year study of the Paradox of Tolerance, evaluating it from every possible angle. Reply to the Paradox if you choose, but don't make the mistake of assuming I don't understand what I post!!
Regardless of the source...
Read the headline.
www.foxnews.com/politics/nat...
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
I've said it before and I'll say it again,
You can't have a Civil War when only one side has an Army.
You don't get war.
You get, Occupation!!!!
Shut Down!!! βοΈ
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
I'm vividly reminded of all the illegal things they've already gotten away with...