Please join us in person or online @lshtm-dash.bsky.social on 26th February to hear about @georgiatomova.bsky.social's recent work on 'How can different modes of survey data collection introduce bias?'
www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/e...
Please join us in person or online @lshtm-dash.bsky.social on 26th February to hear about @georgiatomova.bsky.social's recent work on 'How can different modes of survey data collection introduce bias?'
www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/e...
'How to interpret hazard ratios', with @dominicmagirr.bsky.social and @timpmorris.bsky.social thestatsgeek.com/2026/01/15/h...
@lshtm.bsky.social will be running a 3-day online short course on using multiple imputation to handle missing data on 23-25th June 2026. Teaching staff include James Carpenter, Ruth Keogh, ClΓ©mence Leyrat, and myself. Further details about the course at www.lshtm.ac.uk/study/course...
π₯³ Registration for abstracts for EuroCIM 2026 (Oxford) is now OPEN and the deadline for submissions is 9 January 2026: eurocim.org/oxford-2026/...
π Theme? βCausal inference in health, economic and social scienceβ
π When? April 14-17
π Where? Oxford
π Register? eurocim.org/oxford-2026/...
New PhD position available at @mrcctu.bsky.social to develop guidance on balancing statistical and clinical considerations when choosing an estimand in RCTs.
www.findaphd.com/phds/project...
Thinking of performing a quantitative bias analysis for measurement error or misclassification? Then our recent software review, by Codie Wood, Kate Tilling, myself and Rachael Hughes, may be of interest: rdcu.be/eDRn2
Are estimands being correctly used?
A new review of protocols led by Timothy Clark shows many incorrectly defined estimand attributes. See the top areas for improvement & full results here:
trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.... #Trials
I gave the same talk earlier in the year at the @causalab.bsky.social and this is online youtu.be/2E3NusvsMaI?...
September @vicbiostat.bsky.social seminar:
Camila Olarte Parra from @causalab.bsky.social Karolinska will speak on combining information from trial participants and non-participants in registry-based trials.
All welcome online 25 September.
More info:
www.vicbiostat.org.au/event/combin...
We are recruiting a Research Fellow to develop machine learning based methods for handling missing data @lshtm.bsky.social. See jobs.lshtm.ac.uk/vacancy.aspx... for more details.
We are looking forward to hearing @jonathan-bartlett.bsky.social speak on the G-formula for causal inference using synthetic multiple imputation at the July @vicbiostat.bsky.social seminar!
All welcome online Thursday 24th, 4:00pm Aus EST (7:00am UK time).
www.vicbiostat.org.au/event/g-form...
HIRING!
2 PhD openings within the βSafe Causal Inferenceβ consortium with experts from biostatistics, computer science, math, and epidemiology.
You'll develop new methods to evaluate prediction algorithms that take the causal effect of treatments into account.
π www.lumc.nl/en/about-lum....
1/ NEW R PACKAGE! For estimating the impact of potential interventions on multiple mediators in countering exposure effects (led by @cttc101.bsky.social)
- Paperπ tinyurl.com/ye26jsps
- Packageπ tinyurl.com/yuh4kens
Thread shows published examples of how the method can be used! #EpiSky #CausalSky
π£ Calling everyone working in #datascience #biostatistics #clinicaltrials
Weβre bringing together experts on target-trial emulation and other frameworks, where weβll explore the role and potential of observational data for evaluating the effects of interventions
Donβt miss out π½
bit.ly/TTE_25
π¨ Next month, weβll be hosting a one-day event on target-trial emulation and other frameworks, exploring the role and potential of observational data for evaluating the effects of interventions
Open to everyone working in #datascience #biostatistics #clinicaltrials
Get your ticket π½
bit.ly/TTE_25
I probably misunderstand, but when you install a package it will install other packages it depends on. And then when you load the package with library() it loads the dependencies likewise.
Join us on 10th June (online or in London @lshtm-dash.bsky.social ) to hear from Matthew Sperrin talk about his work on 'Prediction under intervention: challenges and trade-offs'.More details at www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/e...
π SAVE THE DATE: 26 June π for our 1-day event on βTarget trial emulation and other frameworks: The role and potential of observational data for evaluating effects of interventionsβ, hosted by the Centre for Data & Statistical Science for Health (DASH) at LSHTM. @lshtm-dash.bsky.social
Indeed. This paper is a good overview of the ICH E9 addendum on estimands on this topic: doi.org/10.1136/bmj-...
Yes it could. These hypothetical estimands do indeed deviate from what I have always interpreted ITT to mean. For me ITT means analyse according to randomised group and look at outcomes irrespective of events such as treatment switch.
Should data observed after intercurrent events handled by the hypothetical strategy be used in estimation of treatment effects? Rhian Daniel and I investigate... thestatsgeek.com/2025/04/03/t...
'G-formula with multiple imputation for causal inference with incomplete data'. Open access in Statistical Methods in Medical Research. doi.org/10.1177/0962...
π£ π£NEW PAPER providing guidance on best practice for using multiple imputation when estimating interventional mediation effects, considering missingness mechanism, multiple imputation model specification, & variance estimation
#CausalSky #EpiSky
Read more ππ½
journals.lww.com/epidem/abstr...
New paper! We extend my prior work on prognostic adjustment to work with generalized linear models. This is a nice way to gain power in randomized trials (eg with binary outcomes) by leveraging historical data in a way that does not sacrifice type I error control.
arxiv.org/abs/2503.22284
Sorry. I agree with you! My initial reaction/thinking was that in conditional imputation there are two variables in play, with one only defined in those for whom the first takes a certain value. But as you indicate, you can translate this into a problem with one variable. Thank you!
Probably looking at the example in the vignette will (hopefully!) make it clear.
Not the same I don't think. This is about a situation similar to censoring- you have partial info about the missing values. The smcfcs additions are though for factor variables, where instead of the exact category, you know someone belongs to one among a subset of the categories...
Imputation of factor variables when you have partial information about some of the missing values. See here for more details thestatsgeek.com/2025/03/27/m...
3rd April, in London and online, come and hear @rlgrant.bsky.social talk about his new book with Gian Luca Di Tanna on Bayesian meta-analysis. Further details at www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/e...
The EuroCIM program is live! Explore the sessions, speakers, and schedule here: www.eurocim.org/program.html. Get ready for an exciting conference! π