european new right writing claiming to be revolutionary
part of the reason I was always skeptical of the Angela Nagle/Wolfgang Streeck/BSW calls for a left-restrictionism on migration is because it's basically the same rhetoric of the European New Right, and they admit as much in their work
There is a reason I don’t retweet or interact with Sean McCarthy. It’s because he’s a Red Scare simp with a fascist apologist co-host. Hell, Nagel may be still dating or married to that neo-nazi in Pittsburgh at this point. Anyway, I KNOW better. Because I’ve been doing this shit for a long time
A thread about how forcing these discussions into unreceptive families can initiate indignant, reflexive, responses and digging in defensively that can ultimately lead to regret.
"I spent my child's entire childhood jamming them into a box they didn't fit in and the school thinks they can just... let them out of that box because my kid said they don't fit in that box and it's ruining their life? I DON'T THINK SO! GOVERNMENT!!! GET THEM!! THEY LET MY CHILD OUT OF THE BOX!!!!"
THE REASON YOUR KID MIGHT SOCIALLY TRANSITION WITHOUT TALKING TO YOU IS BECAUSE YOU HAVE CREATED AN ENVIRONMENT WHERE THEY DON'T FEEL SAFE TALKING TO YOU ABOUT THEIR NEEDS. INVESTIGATE THAT.
Instead of investigating schools for respecting kids' wishes, the environment where the kid is forced to hide should be investigated, if the true goal is to protect the kids.
Of course, that's not the goal.
Parents should talk to their kids instead of using the government to threaten their schools.
The well-being of children in a family should be the family's business, certainly. The way to access this business is by creating a safe home where there is trust and open communication.
I’m still on Twitter. I will continue to be. I’ve put too much work and research and content on that platform to just leave it. My posts are un searchable and my uploaded videos are probably gone but it’s still there. Somewhere.
My @cato.org colleague @davidjbier.bsky.social putting on an absolute CLINIC on how to handle authoritarian enablers. An absolute masterpiece. 😚💯🔥
It's all there. All of the bullshit claims about emergencies and national security threats. The goal all along was to give Trump the power to deploy the military domestically to suppress dissent and crush MAGA's enemies.
These are dangerous people. They're now in the highest levels of government.
This is just astonishingly great reporting.
All of the crises the White House has claimed over the last 14 months were planned in advance. All of them.
And however much contempt you have for media outlets who reverently relayed Trump's claim to have no relation to Project 2025, it isn't enough.
Steroid impulse control and rage behavior.
the new york times post captioned “here are the suggested serving sizes of common household supplies that surprised us the most” with a photo of a glob of white goo in the palm of a hand
gotta be another way to do this
Are you telling me the Secretary of Energy may have lied to manipulate the market? I am SHOCKED.
its been genuinely so funny that the two massive “scandals” for james talarico so far is that he follows a few onlyfans girls on socials, and that he respects trans people. sounds like a normal guy to me
they really have one trick and its not fucking working
I think this story is a really good example for people to look at when it comes to understanding bias at NYT. It's not that the reporter, Dana Rubinstein, says anything outright false. But the framing, word choices, etc., add up to an unprofessional and biased account.
The Jake Lang/Underage DM thing seems to have been a Groyper set up. I have a suggestion for everyone involved.
IT'S COOL HOW EVERYTHING SUCKS NOW BC 7 BILLIONAIRES HATE THEMSELVES
Well they can do it again, especially if they are going to screencap me on Twitter. I mean, I appreciate it because it gets eyes on the fund. Whatever gets eyes on the fund.
I don’t think people who aren’t regularly covering the reproductive rights beat realize how common it is for women to be incarcerated for miscarriages.
(Sorry, that first tweet should’ve said “clear in the 2010s”. You could see all of these dorks were lining up on the same side, guns pointing in the same direction, no later than the Charlottesville torchlit Nazi rally. All these guys knew exactly what they were and what they were doing together)
LMAO I hope all the Chapo Trap House fans donate to KHJN’s abortion/trans fund www.kentuckyhealthjusticenetwork.org/donate.html
Hello to all of Will Menaker’s twitter followers who are here because of this. You should donate to an abortion fund about it. Here is ours in Kentucky www.kentuckyhealthjusticenetwork.org/donate.html
One day the NYT's editors will read these stories again and be ashamed of themselves. Mamdani called the attack "heinous," "criminal," "reprehensible," "terrorism," and "the antithesis of who we are." The insinuation that he's conflicted about this is disgraceful. www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/n...
Outside Minneapolis City Hall, two protesters blocked a van labeled with “Midwest Plumbing” decals advertising a disconnected phone number. The driver pointed a pistol at them. One of the armed men shot pepperballs into the crowd.
The men weren’t federal agents. They were bounty hunters.
Private bounty hunters are pointing weapons at Minnesota residents, and the local Sheriff’s office is refusing to take action.
“In pediatrics, off-label prescribing is the rule, not the exception” www.aamc.org/news/wish-pe...
"Off-label" does not mean the FDA has not approved the medication; it simply means it has not approved the medication *for that purpose,* and pediatric prescriptions are so frequently off-label because it's extraordinarily difficult to do ethical research with children.
If you took your kid to the doctor recently for any reason, there's a one in five chance you walked away with an off-label prescription. Nearly half of all pediatric prescriptions are off-label.
