Your 1st oath was to mother Earth; your 2nd was to the megacorp that sponsored you, Société Totale, North American General (NAG), Wei-Yuan Agrisciences (Why), HyAk; but you made another, you said it was forced, a 3rd to a "Handler", you slut, do you think Earth would forgive you?
15.03.2026 03:17
👍 24
🔁 3
💬 1
📌 0
15.03.2026 01:59
👍 500
🔁 382
💬 5
📌 15
Pardon, but what the fuck does this even mean? Every civil right we have was won through citizen appeal, not Dem backroom dealing
14.03.2026 17:15
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Do you think that electoralism is the only form of politics? The only form of social change?
14.03.2026 17:14
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
I do vote. I just don't have faith in the electoral system.
14.03.2026 17:14
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
14.03.2026 02:12
👍 409
🔁 185
💬 1
📌 2
The burden of proof lies on the believer. Demanding people prove a negative is deeply unserious
14.03.2026 15:00
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I forgot to mention superpacs, plutocracy, gerontocracy...the issues plaguing the republic are so many I cannot list them all
14.03.2026 14:01
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 1
Given the context of gerrymandering, electoral college bull shit, voter suppression, and backdoor election manipulation...
No.
American democracy is a farce.
14.03.2026 13:59
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 3
📌 0
This was a fun read. The set-up is indeed rote. MC circumvents the antagonist by killings gods and establishing diplomacy between humans and demons.
It's an interesting villainess story, but I cannot disagree that a ton of villainess genre stuff is samey
14.03.2026 11:37
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Yes!!
14.03.2026 11:27
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Like, I get it, there's not enough stuff about frickin ADULTS, especially older women, but at the same time, schoolgirl yuri includes life-changing works that will crush and remake your soul. So it evens out imo
14.03.2026 11:22
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I need at least one cute goth girl or a character who is very obviously a dyke
14.03.2026 11:18
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
its been two weeks and i still cant decide which of these drafts is the funny one so you get both
14.03.2026 04:10
👍 541
🔁 67
💬 4
📌 1
Literally describing a heteronormative relationship in which the woman is the primary performer of emotional and domestic labor
14.03.2026 11:08
👍 20
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Yes
14.03.2026 11:03
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
He also vetoed pro-trans bills.
It's ridiculous to say the Dems are the BEST in the world when it's just obviously not true.
14.03.2026 04:19
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Except for the countries with politicians that are actually willing and able to push pro-trans policies.
The Dems, at best, simply do not pass anti-trans legislation. At worst, they literally just agree with Republicans on the topic, ie Newsom
14.03.2026 04:18
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I mean, I know several queer people who fled the country, and I am considering doing the same. Blue states are not necessarily safe. Dem leadership are not allies. Obvious case in point is Newsom.
14.03.2026 04:16
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Liberal: "wanting legally protected rights is analogous to wanting a video game console"
14.03.2026 04:15
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
We have been seeing that, dipshit
14.03.2026 04:14
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
You think that wanting legally protected rights is the same as wanting a video game console? Are you stupid?
14.03.2026 04:13
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Harris is famous for her terrible treatment of trans people during her tenure as CA AG. If you're too lazy to fact-check, then you are simply being stubborn and are content to remain in your delusions.
14.03.2026 04:12
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I mean, yes, it is a candidate's responsibility to convince the electorate to vote for them. That's how elections work.
14.03.2026 04:09
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 1
The idea that politically engaged leftists don't vote is not actually based in data. You're making accusations without any proof or facts.
14.03.2026 04:08
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Making excuses for genocidal politicians is actively causing harm
14.03.2026 04:06
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I mean, yes, any other framing is disingenuous. It is the job of the politician to represent their constituents. It is therefore the responsibility of the candidate to demonstrate that they can and will do so. That's the point of elections my dude
14.03.2026 04:05
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
That's the problem. She did not convey trustworthiness. It is hard to argue that someone who supports a genocide can he trusted to uphold Democracy.
14.03.2026 04:03
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Breaking a treaty over a genocide is pretty reasonable.
14.03.2026 04:01
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
You are basically saying "She had no choice because the US government is at the behest of rich warhawks" and that is nothing but an argument against voting at all.
If people's choices are blue genocide and red genocide, then it's no wonder they don't want to vote.
14.03.2026 03:59
👍 9
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0