Nice! :)
Oops! Well, good luck ;)
Ty for the reference! :)
Its hard to keep track of all the modeling options with non-linear SEM, let alone understand how they work « under the hoodΒ Β»β¦
(Bollen & Pearl, 2013)
From Pearlβs SCM/SEM framework, a lack of path is clearly a stronger assumption than a present path. In linear models, a lack of path implies cov(x,y)=0, while a present path implies cov(x,y)=\0
But for my current issue, multi-level data with lots of non-linear effects, Bayesian estimation was the best option, at least I believe
Oh u are actually working on SAM! In fact I read your paper on non-linear capabilities of SAM and was considering using it in future studies!
Pretty neat if SE are available now π
(I meant to say =3)
I suppose now there is the newly developped SAM approach that is better at handling lots of non-linear terms, irc.
What are you referencing as not true ? I suppose my statement is conditionnal on the size of the (latent) control variables set. At >=3, if you incluse all 2-way interactions and the one 3way interaction, you are already at the maximum LMS can handle properly according to MuthΓ©n B, irc.
Very low. If you go SEM: uβll need enormous sample size and to go bayesian estimation since ML wonβt handle it
Well, in principle, yes, non-linear controls should be included. But if your controls are measured with error (as it can often be the case in psychology)β¦ Good fucking luck ππ
If u stay in regression setting: it wonβt adjust for anything because the reliability of 2nd and 3rd order terms will be >
Error term: « I am a joke to you ? »
This is Ollie. He found a perfectly placed carrot snack on his walk. Simply can't believe his luck. 13/10 best day ever (TT: maxime_aries)
This is Tuffy. He just woke up from surgery. Has no idea where he is or what's happening, but he's thrilled to be here. 12/10 (TT: teddy_and_tuffy)
On the good book, of course
π Happy birthday to the European flag! πͺπΊ
ποΈ In 1985, it became the EUβs emblem, but did you know it was first adopted 70 years ago today by the Council of Europe?
Learn more about the EU flag facts and figures β‘οΈ link.europa.eu/cxYjT4
This! Admitting budget/time contraints + sensitivity power analysis would not only be more honest but also more usefull for the reader than this « apriori » power analysis nonsense
I agree - bayesian estimation is often a pragmatic choice when MLE simply doesnβt converge in complex model situations. I wonder how many users of bayesian stats are truely « philosophicalΒ Β» users !
Although, tbf, for the total predictive validity (and not only the incremential one) of that manifest to manifest best case scenario, one would have to add .57 * .41 * .67 * .62 = 0.10. So .16, which still is pretty bad!
Yeah, this looks pretty badβ¦
Poutine : "Je veux très littéralement détruire l'Europe".
(Une partie de) la gauche : TOUT CELA N'EST QU'UNE MANOEUVRE POLITIQUE DE MACRON.
Les gens qui nient la menace russe, je les vois comme ceux qui niaient le danger du COVID en pleine pandΓ©mie.
Combine*, rather
U can use both with the model-implied instrumental variable (MIIV) framework π
scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=f...
It is surprising I agree. Also I wonder if some samples (e.g. n=140) can actually handle (well) 2nd order factor models
There still seems to be a lot of confusion about significance testing in psych. No, p-values *donβt* become useless at large N. This flawed point also used to be framed as "too much power". But power isn't the problem β it's 1) unbalanced error rates and 2) the (lack of a) SESOI. 1/ >
The cherry in top is the fact that the relashionship between 2 of the variables are likely bidirectionnal
The more I learn about causal inference, the more I wonder if choosing a thesisβ subject involving a complex moderated mediation model and psychological variables that can only be nudged through soft intervention was the right callβ¦ π«£
Why are guinea-pigs the colours they are? Sewall's got a DAG for that.
We couldn't not rate this classic early DAG by our beloved collective granddagy, Sewall Wright.
14/10. Ten for the DAG, plus one for each cute guinea-pig node.
From Wright (1920) "The Relative Importance of Heredity and Environment in Determining the Piebald Pattern of Guinea-Pigs"