Ann Finkbeiner's Avatar

Ann Finkbeiner

@annfinkbeiner

Freelance science writer, mostly astro, some natsec sci, some women-in-astro, some grief psych, otherwise whatever I can get paid to write about. I love Baltimore, I do.

5,248
Followers
698
Following
1,312
Posts
25.07.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Ann Finkbeiner @annfinkbeiner

Absolutely. Every word you say.

10.03.2026 21:02 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Comic. [Person with shoulder-length hair talking to a second person. She is gesturing at a dinosaur skeleton with a machine mounted on its back.] PERSON 1: Although Bazookasaurusโ€™s distinctive structure was long assumed to be a weapon, vascularization studies show that it was very fragile and could only have been used for display.

Comic. [Person with shoulder-length hair talking to a second person. She is gesturing at a dinosaur skeleton with a machine mounted on its back.] PERSON 1: Although Bazookasaurusโ€™s distinctive structure was long assumed to be a weapon, vascularization studies show that it was very fragile and could only have been used for display.

Bazookasaurus

xkcd.com/3216/

10.03.2026 20:22 ๐Ÿ‘ 2011 ๐Ÿ” 295 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 30 ๐Ÿ“Œ 9

Holy shit - this would be very, very bad:
"The databases, called โ€œNumidentโ€ and the โ€œMaster Death File,โ€ include records for more than 500 million living and dead Americans, including Social Security numbers, places and dates of birth, citizenship, race and ethnicity, and parentsโ€™ names."

10.03.2026 19:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 1738 ๐Ÿ” 938 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 73 ๐Ÿ“Œ 44

I blew it. I mainly didn't like the human writing and when I looked at the writers, I saw why.
Yours in everlasting pickiness,
Ann

10.03.2026 20:25 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Marco Rubioโ€™s Florida Bestie Is an Accused โ€˜Foreign Agentโ€™ Set to Go on Trialโ€” With Rubio On the Witness List David Rivera and Rubio bought a house in Tallahassee when they were coming up together in Florida politics. But heโ€™s been a headache for the secretary of state ever since, and now he could be one for ...

Marco Rubio's BFF is an accused foreign agent and money launderer. His trial is about to start โ€” and Rubio is on the witness list.

My @vanityfair.com story on the legal bomb that's poised to go off in Trumpland.

www.vanityfair.com/news/story/m...

10.03.2026 18:20 ๐Ÿ‘ 2416 ๐Ÿ” 1085 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 91 ๐Ÿ“Œ 61

That Dem consultants told Gov. Walz to stop calling them โ€œweirdโ€ still has me miffed.

10.03.2026 19:00 ๐Ÿ‘ 3847 ๐Ÿ” 774 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 191 ๐Ÿ“Œ 32
Preview
Scientists Get a Glimpse of How New Pandemics Are Made

"Researchers have devised a new tool for discerning between naturally occurring viral outbreaks and those resulting from lab accidents."

๐Ÿ“: Carl Zimmer

I'll give one guess on what they found for SARS-CoV-2 ๐Ÿ™‚...

www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/s...

10.03.2026 16:52 ๐Ÿ‘ 10 ๐Ÿ” 7 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Post image

This is how our government has been corrupted:

1) Donors give huge sums to elect politicians
2) Elected officials rewrite rules in donors' favor
3) Donors make huge profit
4) Repeat

We must get big money out of politics. Itโ€™s the root of all evil in Washington.

10.03.2026 15:35 ๐Ÿ‘ 8676 ๐Ÿ” 3677 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 410 ๐Ÿ“Œ 213
Preview
Millions of Americans can now claim Canadian citizenship by descent. But they have to prove it | CBC News Amid rising tensions in the United States and increased global volatility, many Americans are looking to Canada โ€” and their roots โ€” for a possible way out following recent changes to Canadaโ€™s citizens...

Gonna drop this in here : Canada recently changed the rules on citizenship by descendence, opening it up from one generation to pretty much "whenever". For folks who have **any** Canadian ancestry (which is a lot of the US), there is a path to citizenship in Canada. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...

10.03.2026 15:58 ๐Ÿ‘ 115 ๐Ÿ” 66 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5 ๐Ÿ“Œ 8
Post image

๐ŸŒซ๏ธ๐ŸŒˆ A beautiful, rare sight!

A fog bow appeared Monday near Ridge, Maryland, in St. Mary's County & CWG reader John Gasper captured this stunning photo.

Fog bows are cousins of rainbows and form when sunlight interacts with the tiny droplets in fog, producing a wide, pale rainbow with little color.

10.03.2026 15:24 ๐Ÿ‘ 105 ๐Ÿ” 15 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Preview
Removing race from kidney function algorithm helped more Black patients access transplants Removing race from the eGFR had a big impact, resulting in 5.3 more kidney transplants per 1000 Black candidates.

A long-used medical test underestimated the severity of kidney disease in Black patients. New study says with the bias removed, transplant rates are up. www.statnews.com/2026/03/10/k...

10.03.2026 15:27 ๐Ÿ‘ 44 ๐Ÿ” 18 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
Preview
Concern over US travel visas prompts Ig Nobels to move its awards to Europe Organizers of an annual satirical award for scientific achievement are shifting for the first time from the United States to Europe due to concerns about winners and others being able to get visas.

Having the Ig Nobels leave the US for safety reasons is a pretty on point example of the situation here apnews.com/article/ig-n...

10.03.2026 15:37 ๐Ÿ‘ 86 ๐Ÿ” 36 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 4

Does anyone here know any historians or political scientists who study wartime propaganda? Bonus points if they specialize in the American context specifically, but not necessary

10.03.2026 15:43 ๐Ÿ‘ 21 ๐Ÿ” 20 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Preview
There is No Consensus on Biological Sex At this critical moment when misinformation about sex is being applied to policy globally, scientific clarification on the definition of biological sex is valuable. Here, we evaluate the primary appr...

"While there is no current consensus, we do not advocate for a single definition and contend that a lack of unanimity is not inherently problematic ... [R]egardless of scientific debates, no biological definition of sex should be used to dictate human rights."
#science #biology #trans #transgender

06.03.2026 09:29 ๐Ÿ‘ 14 ๐Ÿ” 6 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Imagine the reaction in the US if ~175 schoolgirls had been killed by a targeted Iranian missile. (Or anyone's missile.)

This is an atrocity.

09.03.2026 21:21 ๐Ÿ‘ 3295 ๐Ÿ” 1011 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 71 ๐Ÿ“Œ 42
Post image

Satellite company @planet.com has announced a *14 day delay* to the release of imagery in the MidEast.

This will be a huge setback for those trying to verify events in the region.

09.03.2026 23:36 ๐Ÿ‘ 67 ๐Ÿ” 37 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 8
Post image

Finds that @aclu.org showed 23 instances of unconstitutional stops from mid-Dec to mid-Jan, including 11 people who were unconstitutionally arrested. But petitioners canโ€™t show it will happen again, so canโ€™t show standing or irreparable harm, esp in light of drawdown of Operation Metro Surge.
2/2

09.03.2026 23:49 ๐Ÿ‘ 72 ๐Ÿ” 19 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 8 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Post image

Judge Eric Tostrud (Trump apptee) issues remarkable ruling in MN. Finds โ€œcompelling & troublingโ€ evidence that DHS had policy of illegally stopping people based solely on race or ethnicity & of arresting without probable cause. But denies relief ...
1/2
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

09.03.2026 23:49 ๐Ÿ‘ 161 ๐Ÿ” 58 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Preview
Epstein Files Fallout: 40 Famous Names and High-Profile Exits A look at how Jeffrey Epsteinโ€™s network reached from Silicon Valley to the halls of Harvard and Buckingham Palace.

A look at how Jeffrey Epsteinโ€™s network reached from Silicon Valley to the halls of Harvard and Buckingham Palace. on.wsj.com/40ohJpz

09.03.2026 23:56 ๐Ÿ‘ 44 ๐Ÿ” 25 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2

He's been spinning this stupid lie for a while now.

09.03.2026 21:54 ๐Ÿ‘ 468 ๐Ÿ” 121 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 18 ๐Ÿ“Œ 3

oh my god
while I was disappointed that AXIS was selected over STROBE-X, I would not have ever wanted their concept study not to proceed and this is a loss for the entire field and a sign of how much Donald Trump and his goons have damaged science in the United States and NASA in particular ๐Ÿ”ญ๐Ÿงช

09.03.2026 20:44 ๐Ÿ‘ 64 ๐Ÿ” 20 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This represents wasting an astronomical (no pun intended) amount of work. IIRC Dragonflyโ€™s CSR was almost 1000 pages and represented years of work from many people.

09.03.2026 20:55 ๐Ÿ‘ 92 ๐Ÿ” 32 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The gutting of NASA Goddard has had a devastating effect on high energy astrophysics. The AXIS probe mission proposal was rejected without review. (The Goddard X-ray mirror lab was significantly impacted by shutdowns and pressured retirements, against the congress approved budget for NASA.)

09.03.2026 20:39 ๐Ÿ‘ 111 ๐Ÿ” 52 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4 ๐Ÿ“Œ 3

Just awful. AXIS would have provided the next step in the study of the high-energy universe. How stupid of NASA management to actively implement Trump's insane NASA budget cuts, which were eventually forestalled anyway in a burst of sanity by congress. Lots of eggs broken for no reason

09.03.2026 20:40 ๐Ÿ‘ 73 ๐Ÿ” 20 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Preview
Maryland lawmakers find Baltimore ICE holding rooms empty during surprise inspection Marylandโ€™s congressional delegation made an unannounced visit Monday to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) field office in Baltimore, only to find the holding rooms empty.

'How convenient.' Lawmakers' surprise visit to previously cramped Baltimore ICE holding facility finds no detainees and just abandoned mattresses www.baltimoresun.com/2026/03/09/b...

09.03.2026 20:27 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 3 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

NBCโ€™s Richard Engel: โ€œThe White House meme campaign is outraging many former US military commandersโ€ฆ they say only someone who has never really seen combat would think itโ€™s a joke and put out material like this.โ€

09.03.2026 16:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 16535 ๐Ÿ” 6890 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 967 ๐Ÿ“Œ 501
Preview
FBI obtains voting data from Arizona GOPโ€™s 2020 review that confirmed Trumpโ€™s loss A federal grand jury in Arizona has subpoenaed records from a review Republican lawmakers conducted of the 2020 presidential results that confirmed Trump lost.

A federal grand jury in Arizona has subpoenaed records from a GOP-led review of the 2020 election results that confirmed President Trump lost.

Election officials and Democrats fear it could be used to interference in this yearโ€™s elections.

09.03.2026 20:31 ๐Ÿ‘ 56 ๐Ÿ” 31 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 8 ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
Post image

Fun fact: people googling โ€˜Solar Flareโ€™ is a great measure of the Sunโ€™s 11-year solar cycle!

09.03.2026 14:43 ๐Ÿ‘ 23 ๐Ÿ” 3 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Just killed a man's whole family and accidentally installed him as leader of Iran. We created Super Vengeance Boy and are just assuming he'll leave us alone.

09.03.2026 20:05 ๐Ÿ‘ 6153 ๐Ÿ” 1040 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 186 ๐Ÿ“Œ 45
Email from Chris Reynolds to the AXIS Team. Subject is disappointing AXIS news. Text of e-mail reads: Dear AXIS Friends,


The AXIS team has received some very disappointing news โ€“ we have been informed by NASA HQ that AXIS is not eligible for selection and hence the Concept Study Report (CSR) will not be subjected to the full review process.   


AXIS represents the scientific aspirations of a large international community. As a member of one of the AXIS science working groups, you deserve a candid explanation from the PI of what happened and why.  That is the purpose of this note.


NASAโ€™s decision was programmatic and not based on a review of the technology or science; the mission profile described in the submitted CSR was over the allowed budget and schedule.  How was such a thing possible?   In short, with NASA-GSFC as the AXIS managing center, the mission formulation process was critically compromised by the seismic shifts occurring in NASA and the Federal government.  The AXIS study team was hit hard by three unprecedented challenges: 


NASAโ€™s Deferred Resignation Program (DRP) and the pressure at GSFC to resign/retire created a rapid and uncontrolled loss of over 20 personnel with key expertise during a critical mission formulation period, including the main GSFC Project Manager (Jimmy Marsh) and the X-ray mirror lead (Will Zhang) and many discipline engineers.

Email from Chris Reynolds to the AXIS Team. Subject is disappointing AXIS news. Text of e-mail reads: Dear AXIS Friends, The AXIS team has received some very disappointing news โ€“ we have been informed by NASA HQ that AXIS is not eligible for selection and hence the Concept Study Report (CSR) will not be subjected to the full review process. AXIS represents the scientific aspirations of a large international community. As a member of one of the AXIS science working groups, you deserve a candid explanation from the PI of what happened and why. That is the purpose of this note. NASAโ€™s decision was programmatic and not based on a review of the technology or science; the mission profile described in the submitted CSR was over the allowed budget and schedule. How was such a thing possible? In short, with NASA-GSFC as the AXIS managing center, the mission formulation process was critically compromised by the seismic shifts occurring in NASA and the Federal government. The AXIS study team was hit hard by three unprecedented challenges: NASAโ€™s Deferred Resignation Program (DRP) and the pressure at GSFC to resign/retire created a rapid and uncontrolled loss of over 20 personnel with key expertise during a critical mission formulation period, including the main GSFC Project Manager (Jimmy Marsh) and the X-ray mirror lead (Will Zhang) and many discipline engineers.

GSFC priorities rapidly realigned to the FY2026 Presidentโ€™s Budget Request (PBR) that eliminated the Probe program, further reducing the availability of GSFC engineering and mission formulation personnel (incl. cost analysts and schedulers) over the critical Summer and Fall months. Key work was halted for almost seven weeks when the core GSFC AXIS study team, dominated by NASA civil servants, was furloughed during the government shutdown.  NASA HQโ€™s extension to the CSR submission deadline (from 18-Dec-2025 to 29-Jan-2026) was inadequate compensation for the disruption and lost time.


Taken together, these factors disrupted the basic grass-roots costing process (which requires extensive โ€œreach backโ€ to the discipline engineers to assess labor requirements) as well as the cost-design iteration process that is central to the formulation of a cost-capped and schedule-constrained mission.  While the mission design was finalized in April, our initial grass-roots costing (which was ~10% over budget) could only be completed in September due to the lack of assigned resources.  With the subsequent government shutdown and then โ€œpens downโ€ in early-December forced by the GSFC Executive Review process, there was no opportunity to work through the set of cost/schedule savings that had already been identified by the AXIS team. 


Ultimately, the GSFC executive council gave AXIS leadership the choice of submitting a CSR with a non-compliant schedule and cost, or not submitting a CSR at all.  We of course proceeded with the submission, including a narrative that we understood the path to a cost-compliant profile (that we would have discussed with the review panels during the Site Visit). NASA HQ has ruled this stance to be unacceptable.


It is important to stress that NASAโ€™s programmatic decision was before any technical review had been conducted.  The decision was NOT due to any concerns about AXIS technology. Indeed, the AXIS Phase A work had major successes with furthering

GSFC priorities rapidly realigned to the FY2026 Presidentโ€™s Budget Request (PBR) that eliminated the Probe program, further reducing the availability of GSFC engineering and mission formulation personnel (incl. cost analysts and schedulers) over the critical Summer and Fall months. Key work was halted for almost seven weeks when the core GSFC AXIS study team, dominated by NASA civil servants, was furloughed during the government shutdown. NASA HQโ€™s extension to the CSR submission deadline (from 18-Dec-2025 to 29-Jan-2026) was inadequate compensation for the disruption and lost time. Taken together, these factors disrupted the basic grass-roots costing process (which requires extensive โ€œreach backโ€ to the discipline engineers to assess labor requirements) as well as the cost-design iteration process that is central to the formulation of a cost-capped and schedule-constrained mission. While the mission design was finalized in April, our initial grass-roots costing (which was ~10% over budget) could only be completed in September due to the lack of assigned resources. With the subsequent government shutdown and then โ€œpens downโ€ in early-December forced by the GSFC Executive Review process, there was no opportunity to work through the set of cost/schedule savings that had already been identified by the AXIS team. Ultimately, the GSFC executive council gave AXIS leadership the choice of submitting a CSR with a non-compliant schedule and cost, or not submitting a CSR at all. We of course proceeded with the submission, including a narrative that we understood the path to a cost-compliant profile (that we would have discussed with the review panels during the Site Visit). NASA HQ has ruled this stance to be unacceptable. It is important to stress that NASAโ€™s programmatic decision was before any technical review had been conducted. The decision was NOT due to any concerns about AXIS technology. Indeed, the AXIS Phase A work had major successes with furthering

Indeed, the AXIS Phase A work had major successes with furthering the key technologies. GSFCโ€™s Next Generation X-ray Optics (NGXO) team successfully demonstrated iridium-coated, stress-compensated mirror segments that meet AXIS baseline requirements (i.e. segment-level performance at sub-arcsecond level).ย  NGXO also built the first AXIS demonstrator mirror module, learning critical lessons about mirror alignment, mounting and bonding. On the detector side, MIT quickly moved to fabricate AXIS-like CCDs and, working with our colleagues at Stanford, recently demonstrated that they achieve the required readout rate and spectral resolution. 


Similarly, NASAโ€™s decision was NOT a judgment of the importance of AXIS science.  The AXIS science case was rated excellent in the Step 1 review, and it only became stronger during our Phase A study.  The AXIS Community Science Book, which many of you contributed to, is an extremely powerful demonstration of the relevance and importance of high-resolution X-ray observations to all areas of astrophysics. The Science Book is one of the most important legacies of the AXIS Phase A study and, I believe, will help define future mission concepts for many years to come.  I thank you all from the bottom of my heart for all of your work on this.


AXIS has been a long journey; we started under the leadership of Richard Mushotzky more than nine years ago.  During that time, itโ€™s been an enormous privilege to work with amazing people; the AXIS science team, the incredible/brilliant GSFC and Northrop Grumman engineers, and the wider astrophysics community.  I am, quite frankly, livid that AXIS ultimately fell victim to the programmatic chaos of 2025. The astronomical community deserves better. I hope that NASA leadership, especially at GSFC and HQ, can have an honest discussion about how to better support and protect programs during extraordinary times.

Indeed, the AXIS Phase A work had major successes with furthering the key technologies. GSFCโ€™s Next Generation X-ray Optics (NGXO) team successfully demonstrated iridium-coated, stress-compensated mirror segments that meet AXIS baseline requirements (i.e. segment-level performance at sub-arcsecond level).ย  NGXO also built the first AXIS demonstrator mirror module, learning critical lessons about mirror alignment, mounting and bonding. On the detector side, MIT quickly moved to fabricate AXIS-like CCDs and, working with our colleagues at Stanford, recently demonstrated that they achieve the required readout rate and spectral resolution. Similarly, NASAโ€™s decision was NOT a judgment of the importance of AXIS science. The AXIS science case was rated excellent in the Step 1 review, and it only became stronger during our Phase A study. The AXIS Community Science Book, which many of you contributed to, is an extremely powerful demonstration of the relevance and importance of high-resolution X-ray observations to all areas of astrophysics. The Science Book is one of the most important legacies of the AXIS Phase A study and, I believe, will help define future mission concepts for many years to come. I thank you all from the bottom of my heart for all of your work on this. AXIS has been a long journey; we started under the leadership of Richard Mushotzky more than nine years ago. During that time, itโ€™s been an enormous privilege to work with amazing people; the AXIS science team, the incredible/brilliant GSFC and Northrop Grumman engineers, and the wider astrophysics community. I am, quite frankly, livid that AXIS ultimately fell victim to the programmatic chaos of 2025. The astronomical community deserves better. I hope that NASA leadership, especially at GSFC and HQ, can have an honest discussion about how to better support and protect programs during extraordinary times.

For now, as a community, we must look forward. There is still one excellent mission under consideration for the Probe program, PRIMA, and we wish them a smooth and speedy path to selection and flight.  In X-ray astronomy, the SMEX and MidEX programs represent concrete pathways for focused, high-impact missions, and the scientific case we built for AXIS provides a strong foundation for those concepts. The technologies we advanced in Step 1 and Phase A, particularly the NGXO mirror work and the MIT/Stanford detector demonstrations, can anchor the next generation of proposals. Most importantly, the AXIS Community Science Book, representing more than 500 scientists across, is a living document and a powerful signal to NASA leadership that this community is organized, serious, and not going anywhere. I encourage everyone to use it actively, as a resource for future concept development, for Astro2030 engagement, and for building the next mission that will deliver high angular resolution X-ray imaging to address the fundamental questions about black hole growth, galaxy evolution, and the hot universe that motivated AXIS from the beginning. This community built something remarkable over nine years and that doesn't end here.


Thank you again for your support of AXIS over these times.


Best

Chris and the AXIS leadership team

For now, as a community, we must look forward. There is still one excellent mission under consideration for the Probe program, PRIMA, and we wish them a smooth and speedy path to selection and flight. In X-ray astronomy, the SMEX and MidEX programs represent concrete pathways for focused, high-impact missions, and the scientific case we built for AXIS provides a strong foundation for those concepts. The technologies we advanced in Step 1 and Phase A, particularly the NGXO mirror work and the MIT/Stanford detector demonstrations, can anchor the next generation of proposals. Most importantly, the AXIS Community Science Book, representing more than 500 scientists across, is a living document and a powerful signal to NASA leadership that this community is organized, serious, and not going anywhere. I encourage everyone to use it actively, as a resource for future concept development, for Astro2030 engagement, and for building the next mission that will deliver high angular resolution X-ray imaging to address the fundamental questions about black hole growth, galaxy evolution, and the hot universe that motivated AXIS from the beginning. This community built something remarkable over nine years and that doesn't end here. Thank you again for your support of AXIS over these times. Best Chris and the AXIS leadership team

The @axisprobe.bsky.social team learned that the phase A concept study report of AXIS (the Advanced X-ray Imaging Satellite) will not be reviewed because the lost personnel at NASA Goddard and government shutdown impacted our schedule and budget. ๐Ÿ”ญ Here is the PI's e-mail with the explanation.

09.03.2026 20:05 ๐Ÿ‘ 219 ๐Ÿ” 94 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 21 ๐Ÿ“Œ 28