platoβs republic is about as good as harry potter and the prisoner of azkaban yeah
platoβs republic is about as good as harry potter and the prisoner of azkaban yeah
itβs so sick that Cato is on the team now
love this
finally, a situation where the manβs love for deals is not really a problem and hurts nobody
Strauss being not the sharpest tool in the shed before WWII was even over
so THATβS what βnever [having] indulged in those radical breaks with traditions which played such a role on the continentβ does to a mf
happy birthday!
Neoplatonist post-rock band with songs titled, like, *Nous*
Bush did not have the opportunity to tip the scale on the supreme court. key difference
playing for clout points is so boring. why would you want to win an argument. βdonβt immanentize the eschaton,β as they say
idk why someone outside the US would choose to die on the "they said they would do this the whole time" hill, there are plenty of reasons to believe it wasnβt going to happen even if they said so, and there were plenty of reasons to agree with you. the only difference winning makes is clout points
there has not been a court with no center in the modern eraβand the last time there wasnβt one, the court tipped liberal. the last time there was a conservative majority in the court was well before Roe, and there was still a center at that point.
there is definitely something novel at play here! itβs that during Trump 1 the supreme court was captured in a way that it never had been, compounded by the fact that knock on effects from that event werenβt revealed until the subsequent administration. like i said, fucked around and found out!
i think weβd likely agree that thatβs fine, so thereβs no problem here!
sorry for getting aggro though. you know how at the end of s2 of twin peaks, no characters actually changed, yet the viewer feels as though theyβre watching a very different show? i think weβre arguing over whether or not the viewer should get to feel like the show is different if nobody changed
ah, seems i got confused by your post because i donβt pay attention to the oped class. i will say that βdid sayβ lacks as much nuance as βdid not sayβ if what actually happened was βnobody bothered to fuck around and find out until DJTβ
i think that repealing Roe came as such a shock because βdeliveringβ on abortion was not actually standard for republicans, just a stated goal the GOP had worked on for a long time (not very hard). this also applies to some things not listed here, like kicking millions off of healthcare
the primary tool for reconciling the two Pennsylvania Man modes of being (scared and overconfident) is the car
no, itβs moving through scales within a dynamic space. dialectics operate on levels that are too micro for this visibly macro model. This is also Hegel
to be clear, this was a joke that attempted to tie the idea of a reading of the history of philosophy that indexes on objects rather than society to the fact that models are objects
get ready for this one: LLMs are conscious but not capable of sentience. animals of course are both conscious and sentient, juryβs out if they reached the top of the pyramid and hit subjectivity like usβand plants are likely conscious but juryβs out if they hit sentience
Hegel teaches us this
the model is uniquely adept at answering questions on Aristotle and Heidegger at first pass; Plato and Kant are way harder for it to parse without giving it a lot more context. really makes you think!
also, Noem has a BA in political science (which she got online in 2012 at the age of 40) but Mullin only has an associateβs in construction (which he got in 2010 at the age of 33). heβs the only senator without a 4 year college degree!
that account is gybe slander. unfit to hold the name
This Post Was Paid For By Big Neocon
the hearing yesterday was really dire, she was not capable of defending herself to a standard the admin expects
i should probably here note that this post is advocating for enjoying each theory equally, because no single theory or field of theory or process inherently prepares anyone to construct solutions when push comes to shove and the bluff is called
French theory doesnβt prepare you for anything, itβs just more trash communicators with Great Man problems.
having an an astute analysis of a problem but lacking an impulse to offer solutions is ultimately just negation for its own sake and it often drives people to nihilism.
great pens not represented here: zebra sarasa 0.7, pretty similar to the pilot G4 except its ink is gel-type so the pen glides much more. also the muji cap type 0.38 is a workhorse for notebooks that have a delicate smooth grain paper, like those found in moleskine notebooks
kristi too probably