Trending

#caenergy

Latest posts tagged with #caenergy on Bluesky

Latest Top
Trending

Posts tagged #caenergy

California Supreme Court hands victory to rooftop solar panel owners **In summary** A California appeals court upheld a 2022 regulatory decision to reduce rooftop solar payments. Environmental groups may appeal to the state Supreme Court. _Welcome to CalMatters, the only nonprofit newsroom devoted solely to covering issues that affect all Californians. Sign up forWhatMatters to receive the latest news and commentary on the most important issues in the Golden State._ A California appeals court this week sided with state utility regulators in a case seen as crucial to the spread of solar panels on the rooftops of California homes. Three appeals court judges ruled that the California Public Utilities Commission was justified in reducing the rate utilities pay customers for excess energy the customers’ solar panels generate. Environmental advocates who brought the case say the decision will exacerbate California’s energy affordability crisis. Regulators believe it vindicates a decision they took “to ensure that rooftop solar programs remain fair, sustainable, and aligned with California’s clean energy goals,” CPUC spokesperson Terrie Prosper said Tuesday. The case centered on the state’s “net energy metering” program, which governs how much solar customers are paid for excess power from their panels. Earlier versions of the program guaranteed customers the retail rate, which is how much utilities charge other customers when they resell the energy. But a 2022 commission decision reduced this payment by about 75%. The commission’s decision backed utilities’ position, which was that those who have rooftop panels don’t pay their fair share of costs such as maintaining the grid, shifting the expenses disproportionately to non-solar customers. The decision resulted in a significant drop in new customers signing up for rooftop solar. ## Prior Ruling ### California Supreme Court hands victory to rooftop solar panel owners August 7, 2025August 8, 2025 Advocacy groups sued over the decision, including the Center for Biological Diversity, The Protect our Communities Foundation, and the Environmental Working Group. They argued that commissioners didn’t properly take into consideration the benefits to disadvantaged communities and customers of having local energy generation. The case reached an appeals court, which applied, in a decision siding with commissioners, a legal standard granting them significant deference. The Supreme Court of California then unanimously ruled last August that the lower court should not have applied this standard and must delve more deeply into the substance of the arguments. 1. Just the right amount of news 2. Just the right amount of news 1. Get California’s most essential headlines without feeling overwhelmed. 2. Get California’s most essential headlines without feeling overwhelmed. Email address By clicking subscribe, you agree to the terms. Δ Roger Lin, senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, said this week’s decision is “disappointing” and the groups are “evaluating all of our options.” They can appeal again to the state supreme court. “The whole reason the utilities created the ‘cost shift’ narrative was to preserve their profits,” Lin said. Under state law, utilities can earn a rate of return on everything they build, which amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars from ratepayers every year. They can’t earn that return on customers’ rooftop solar. The decision comes amid renewed attention on California’s energy affordability crisis. Golden State residents pay the second highest rates in the country for energy after Hawaii, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Ratepayers routinely admonish state utility regulators for their high bills at public meetings. And Gov. Gavin Newsom recently announced an upcoming replacement of the head of the utilities commission as part of a move to focus on bill affordability. Read more from CalMatters Text Get breaking news on your phone. Download Keep up with the latest via our app. Sign up Receive free updates in your inbox. ## Nonpartisan, independent California news for all We’re CalMatters, your nonprofit and nonpartisan news guide. Our journalists are here to empower you and our mission continues to be essential. * **We are independent and nonpartisan.** Our trustworthy journalism is free from partisan politics, free from corporate influence and actually free for all Californians. * **We are focused on California issues.** From the environment to homelessness, economy and more, we publish the unfettered truth to keep you informed. * **We hold people in power accountable.** We probe and reveal the actions and inactions of powerful people and institutions, and the consequences that follow. But we can’t keep doing this without support from readers like you. **********Please give what you can today. Every gift helps.********** GIVE NOW

Net metering for solar owners suffers defeat in California courts calmatters.org/economy/2026/03/net-mete... #NEM3 #Solar #RooftopSolar #CAEnergy

1 0 0 0

Who Pays for AI’s Power? California Watchdog Urges New Data Center Rules www.usnews.com/news/best-states/califor... #CAEnergy #DataCenters #Energy #LittleHoover

0 0 0 0
Little Hoover Commission Report: Data Centers Should Pay Their Own Energy Costs

Little Hoover Commission Report: Data Centers Should Pay Their Own Energy Costs mailchi.mp/lhc.ca.gov/little-hoover... #CAEnergy #DataCenters #LittleHoover

0 0 0 0
Preview
An oil refinery defined life in this quaint California city. What happens when it’s gone? For decades, the Valero refinery shaped Benicia’s economy, politics and health. Now the city has become a reluctant test case of whether an oil town can reinvent itself

An #oil #refinery defined life in this quaint #California city. What happens when it’s gone? | California | The Guardian www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2... #CAEnergy #Decarbonization

0 0 0 0
Original post on sfba.social

Governor Newsom names new California Public Utilities Commission President to launch new phase in effort to protect consumers from escalating utility costs | Governor of California […]

0 0 0 0
Preview
San Luis Obispo City Council urged the California State Legislature to support safety efforts, reinstate tax revenues and support land conservation in SLO as the legislature deliberates on extending nuclear plant Diablo Canyon’s operations by 20 years. The council voted 5-0 to send their letter to the legislature but not without disagreement. San Luis Obispo is the only city to write its own letter about Diablo Canyon’s extension. The other six cities in SLO county signed onto the letter written by SLO County. Councilmember Michelle Shoresman and councilmember Jan Marx were the main authors of the letter. “Being pressured by other cities or the board of supervisors, or unions, or pro-nuclear activists, we feel that pressure,” Marx said.“But, in the long run our job is to represent the people who vote us into office.” The city council broke down their letter into three parts: public safety and emergency preparedness, fiscal mitigation and long-term planning and land conservation. The letter advocates that these issues must be addressed before supporting a 20-year extension. Both Marx and Shoresman stated they felt the letter addressed SLO’s community needs given the short time they had to write it. However, some of the SLO community didn’t fully approve of the city council’s letter. Diablo Canyon produces 10% of California’s energy and provides more than 1300 head-of-household jobs for SLO County. Citizens wanted more direct language that advocated for the advancement of the plant and establishing the unitary tax. ## **Advocacy for the Unitary Tax** Ben Licker, a founder of The San Luis Coastal Parent Network that advocates for school funding, noted he wanted to see more explicit language used around taxes. “I think it’s important that we focus on the revenues that are going to my kids,” Licker said, “And it’s really just paying property taxes, that’s really what it comes down to.” The San Luis Coastal Unified School District is currently in a $5-7 million deficit, the unitary tax can add to needed school funding. In the letter to the lawmakers, the city states that they know schools and local governments have relied on unitary taxes as a major source of funding for a long time. Rachel Whalen, the government affairs officer for SLO County, noted that the plant needs to be operating in order for schools and cities to receive money from the unitary tax. “Five additional years is simply not enough,” Whalen said. “Our community relies on this revenue to support local schools and essential services and the loss of the unitary tax has already had real and massive impacts.” Whalen added that as much as they appreciate SLO City Council’s letter, the county’s position stays the same, and they hope to see the city start to explicitly support the 20-year extension. ## **Questions about safety** The city received a letter from SLO’s Senator John Laird regarding his concerns on safety. According to Marx, this informed their decision to make safety a part of their letter to the lawmakers. In Laird’s letter to SLO County, which he attached in his letter to city council, he outlines issues such as providing funding for preserving surrounding land and needing more safety review processes for workers and residents. SLO City Council’s letter addressed that SLO is 10 miles away from the plant’s evacuation point. They want to see more safety efforts from PG&E before moving on with extending operations. However, Mayor Erica Stewart disagreed with the letter on its stance of safety. She agreed that it is important, but felt it was already addressed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). “We would not be looking at this 20 year option from the NRC if we did not find it was safe,” Stewart said. However, She also adds that she recognizes Laird’s concerns and wants to see those addressed. ## **Land Conservation** Stewart noted she spoke to the yakʔitʸutʸu tribe in SLO to see how they are going to be affected by the plant. Going forward, according to the letter, the city wants PG&E to allow some public access to the area so that they don’t encroach on local communities. The California Legislature will submit an introductory bill on Diablo Canyon on Feb. 20.

SLO City Council's concerns on Diablo Canyon extension - Mustang News mustangnews.net/slo-council-letter-diabl... #DiabloCanyon #CAEnergy #Nuclear

0 0 0 0

How California plans to keep the lights on: A look into recent regulatory developments - #Climate 411 blogs.edf.org/climate411/2026/02/06/ho... #CAEnergy

0 1 0 0

PG&E wants to raise your rates again www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/articl... #CAEnergy

0 0 0 0
Preview
Train derailment leaves thousands of Stockton PG&E customers without power Power was knocked out for thousands of San Joaquin County residents Monday morning, mostly in central and south Stockton, after a train derailment, PG&E; said.

Power knocked out for thousands in #Stockton after train #derailment www.recordnet.com/story/news/local/2026/02... #PGC #PowerOutage #CAEnergy

0 0 0 0
Preview
The plan to build a massive data center in Imperial County — without environmental review As demand for computing power soars nationwide, a Southern California entrepreneur with past legal troubles is trying to speed forward an immense data center in Imperial County.

The plan to build a massive data center in Imperial County — without environmental review | KPBS Public Media www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/01... #DataCenters #IID #CAEnergy #CEQA

1 0 0 0

Sacramento's hookup problem - POLITICO www.politico.com/newsletters/california-c... #CAEnergy #EnergyTransmission #RenewableEnergy #Utilities

0 0 0 0
**In summary** California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s $200 million proposal to revive the state’s EV market would reach only a fraction of buyers, raising fresh questions about who should benefit and whether limited incentives can meaningfully move a slowing market. _Welcome to CalMatters, the only nonprofit newsroom devoted solely to covering issues that affect all Californians. Sign up forWhatMatters to receive the latest news and commentary on the most important issues in the Golden State._ California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s $200 million plan to revive the state’s stalling electric-car market faces several fundamental problems: It isn’t enough money, it may not reach consumers quickly enough and the state hasn’t decided whether to subsidize – or exclude – wealthier buyers. The Newsom administration’s budget proposal — rolled out after President Donald Trump dismantled federal electric vehicle incentives and blocked California’s clean-vehicle mandate — would cover rebates for only about 20% of last year’s EV sales. That CalMatters estimate assumes the state follows the model of the Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which offered rebates of up to $7,500 toward some electric and hybrid cars before the California Air Resources Board ended it in 2023. So far the administration has released few details about the proposal, leaving experts and lawmakers circling a basic question: Who should get the money? “It is better than nothing, which is what a lot of things are getting right now,” said Mars Wu, a senior program manager with the Greenlining Institute, which advocates for investments in communities of color. “How far that $200 million goes really depends on how the program is going to be structured.” ## **A small incentive in a huge market** California’s electric car market is one the governor celebrates on the world stage. While at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland earlier this week, Newsom highlighted that California has surpassed 2.5 million clean car sales, saying the achievement came after the state “invested in this future when others said it was impossible.” He framed the number against a modest goal to get 1.5 million clean cars on the road, set more than a decade ago. California officials remain confident the state’s policies will succeed in pushing the transition to electric cars. Even as sales have slipped, EVs will drive future electricity demand, according to a long-term forecast approved Wednesday by the California Energy Commission. But the limits of the governor’s $200 million EV proposal become clear in the numbers. A CalMatters analysis found the incentive would cover only one out of every five EV sales, assuming similar sales to last year, and the same average rebate level as the state’s last mass-market rebate program. Advocates are also raising concerns about how quickly the money can get to consumers. Christopher Chavez, deputy policy director at the Coalition for Clean Air, a California-focused advocacy group, warned that the proposed rebates may not reach consumers until 2027, given how long it takes to approve the budget and to set up a new program. If the funding only lasts a year, the program would leave out buyers who need time to plan or save, he added. 1. Just the right amount of news 2. Just the right amount of news 1. Get California’s most essential headlines without feeling overwhelmed. 2. Get California’s most essential headlines without feeling overwhelmed. Email address By clicking subscribe, you agree to the terms. Δ “It’s not going to be enough — just to be blunt about it,” Chavez said. “Two-hundred million for a mass-market program will go very quickly.” The proposal comes as the latest sales numbers show an electric car market slump. Nationally, the loss of the uncapped, popular federal tax credit has accelerated manufacturer write-downs and sales declines as automakers adjusted to a tougher EV market. In California, the slowdown has pushed the state further off course from its climate goals: even before Congress and President Trump blocked its vehicle mandate last year, California was struggling to hit a requirement that 35% of new cars sold in 2026 be zero-emission. Last year electric and other zero emission cars made up about 23% of new car sales in 2025, down from roughly 25% the year prior, California Energy Commission data shows. Sales slowed down dramatically at the end of the year, when EVs and other clean cars accounted for just under 19% of new car sales in the fourth quarter of 2025 — the lowest quarterly share since mid-2022. The Newsom administration will likely lay out the details of its proposal in a draft bill tied to the state budget. The Clean Vehicle Rebate Program would be “the foundation we’d be building from,” wrote Lindsey Buckley, an air board spokesperson, in an email, adding that the goal would be to deploy the $200 million “as soon as possible to support the market.” Buckley said it is “speculative” to predict the impact of a new EV incentive or how quickly the money would reach consumers. An environmental activist places signage calling for increased electric vehicle use outside the California Environmental Protection Agency building in Sacramento on June 9, 2022. Environmental activists urged the California Air Resources Board to push for a transition toward 100% electric vehicle consumer use. Photo by Rahul Lal, CalMatters With limited funding, advocates say the question of who qualifies for the rebates becomes critical. “What we really don’t want to see is that money going towards higher-income folks for whom it would just be kind of like a bonus coupon,” said Wu, of the Greenlining Institute. ## **Fast or targeted: lawmakers face a choice** How the Newsom administration and lawmakers design the state’s next EV incentive will determine how quickly the air board can deliver rebates — and whether the program avoids recreating past inequities. California ended its last, broad EV rebate program in 2023 over concerns it benefited higher-income buyers. Targeting lower-income drivers delivers the greatest benefits because they tend to drive the most, and switching to EVs saves them money on fuel and maintenance, said Ethan Elkind, a climate law expert at UC Berkeley. But income-based “means testing” can slow programs down, requiring income verification and layers of bureaucracy that eat up funding and discourage participation. That’s a critique of one California program aimed at low-income buyers, Clean Cars 4 All, which offers grants to help drivers trade in older, more polluting vehicles for cleaner alternatives. As the state moved from budget surplus to deficit, the Newsom administration and lawmakers never adequately funded it, advocates say. Lawmakers provided no new funding in the 2024–25 budget year, and in the current budget cycle, the state provided only about $45 million through a combination of funds and one-time budget actions, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office. That falls well short of a sustained, long-term commitment, said Chavez, of the Coalition for Clean Air. “It’s become — especially as the budget has become more difficult — more of a secondary priority, which is unfortunate,” he said. ## **Competing ideas, no clear consensus** California’s EV problem has no shortage of potential solutions — only disagreement over which one to choose. Some policy analysts argue the state should focus on first-time adoption. A recent brief from Atlas Public Policy found that incentives are most cost-effective when they bring a household’s first electric vehicle into the garage — because once a family owns one EV, it is far more likely to buy another. Elkind, of UC Berkeley, said a simpler approach — a point-of-sale rebate tied to lower-priced vehicles — would be easier for the air board to administer while avoiding subsidies for high-income buyers. “If it’s just tied to the price of the vehicle, that’s pretty straightforward,” Elkind said. Some lawmakers told CalMatters the air board should tightly target the rebates to communities most affected by pollution and transportation costs. State Senator Ben Allen, a Democrat from El Segundo, said incentives should focus on communities that suffer the most from air pollution, “so as to increase the bang for air quality buck.” Senator Josh Becker, a Democrat from Menlo Park, said new incentives should go to the people “who are most burdened by transportation costs and drive the most.” ## Fewer easy EV buyers in **California** California needs to design its next rebate program well because its most eager EV buyers are gone and the state now faces a harder, more price-sensitive market, experts said. “California is one of the first states to sort of get into that mainstream market: and it’s a harder market to convert,” said Loren McDonald, a Danville-based EV analyst. Potential buyers now expect seamless charging and balk at waiting 30 to 40 minutes. They also are not keen to install home chargers or pay more upfront. Many, he says, stick with traditional gasoline-powered vehicles. “We burned through the innovators and the early adopters — those people who want to save the planet, those people who make good money,” McDonald said. _Staff writer Erica Yee contributed to this report._ Read more from CalMatters Text Get breaking news on your phone. Download Keep up with the latest via our app. Sign up Receive free updates in your inbox. ## Nonpartisan, independent California news for all We’re CalMatters, your nonprofit and nonpartisan news guide. Our journalists are here to empower you and our mission continues to be essential. * **We are independent and nonpartisan.** Our trustworthy journalism is free from partisan politics, free from corporate influence and actually free for all Californians. * **We are focused on California issues.** From the environment to homelessness, economy and more, we publish the unfettered truth to keep you informed. * **We hold people in power accountable.** We probe and reveal the actions and inactions of powerful people and institutions, and the consequences that follow. But we can’t keep doing this without support from readers like you. **********Please give what you can today. Every gift helps.********** GIVE NOW

Newsom's $200M #EV plan may not be enough calmatters.org/environment/climate-chan... #CAEnergy #Decarbonization

0 1 0 0
Preview
San Francisco merchants announce lawsuit against PG&E over December blackout Several business owners in San Francisco announced a lawsuit against PG&E; in response to December's massive blackout.

San Francisco merchants announce lawsuit against PG&E – NBC Bay Area www.nbcbayarea.com/video/news/local/san-fra... #SFPowerOutage #CAEnergy

0 0 0 0

Wildfire victims decry state law protecting utilities from cost of disasters they cause - Los Angeles Timeswww.latimes.com/business/story/2026-01-1... #wildfire #CAEnergy #SCE

0 0 0 0
Preview
California’s electricity cost and reliability conundrum - Capitol Weekly OPINION - While the antipathy toward PG&E; has long been well justified, the utility’s latest blackout should not throw yet another log on the fire of vilification in a gubernatorial election year that further obscures the complexity of the state’s electricity challenges.

California’s #electricity cost and reliability conundrum - Capitol Weekly | Capitol Weekly | Capitol Weekly: The Newspaper of California State Government and Politics. capitolweekly.net/californias-electricity-... #CAEnergy #Affordability #Energy

0 0 0 0
Preview
When Bay Area PG&E substations caught fire, inspectors had already raised red flags The utility, which serves 16 million customers from Eureka to Bakersfield and made a record profit of $2.47 billion last year, has faced accusations for years that it has prioritized paying billions of dollars to shareholders over safety.

PG&E substation fires in Bay Area followed safety violations flagged by state inspectors www.mercurynews.com/2026/01/06/fires-blackou... #PCG #CAEnergy #SFPowerOutage

0 0 0 0

#California bill would ease rules for home plug-in solar panels www.sfchronicle.com/california/article/rente... #Solar #CAEnergy

0 0 0 0

#SCE is having some #outage challenges today. They've got about 2.7k customers on unplanning, and 4.8k customers out on planned outages. #CAEnergy #PowerOutage

0 0 0 0

Big Tech blocks California data center rules, leaving only a study www.sfchronicle.com/california/article/big-t... #CAEnergy #DataCenters #LargeLoads #ElectricRates

1 0 0 0

Looks like PG&E is having another #outagerOutage in the same area as the last big one. Total for PG&E is 4.6k rn #CAEnergy

1 4 2 0
ArcGIS Dashboards ArcGIS Dashboards

Over 97k #outages in #California www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/7edefc19... #CAWx #CAEnergy

0 0 0 0
Preview
State reins in profits for PG&E, other utilities, as bill debate rages State regulators reined in the profit returns that shareholders of PG&E and other utility giants can harvest.

State reins in profits for PG&E, other utilities, as bill debate rages www.mercurynews.com/2025/12/18/pge-economy-b... #CAEnergy #CostOfCapital #PCG #CPUC

1 0 0 0
AB 585 Webinar: California Clean Energy Assessment Report

AB 585 Webinar: California Clean Energy Assessment Report mailchi.mp/gobiz/thank-you-for-atte... #CAEnergy #Decarbonization #GHG #RenewableEnergy

0 2 0 0

Will the sun set on California’s sea of mirrors? - POLITICO www.politico.com/newsletters/california-c... #Ivanpaugh #CSP #Solar #CAEnergy #CPUC

0 0 0 0

#Vistra will not build a #battery plant in #Morro Bay CA | San Luis Obispo Tribune www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/environment/a... #CAEnergy #Storage #BatteryFire

0 0 0 0

California’s #undergrounding conundrum - POLITICO www.politico.com/newsletters/california-c... #CAEnergy #WildfireMitigation #Electricity

0 0 0 0
California’s methane satellite helps stop 10 large leaks | California Air Resources Board What you need to know: California steps in as federal administration moves to eliminate climate data-gathering satellites. The state satellite project has already helped resolve 10 large methane leaks, equivalent to removing about 18,000 cars from California roads for a year.

California’s #methane satellite helps stop 10 large leaks | California Air Resources Board ww2.arb.ca.gov/news/californias-methane... #Climate #ClimateChange #Decarbonization #CAEnergy #CARB

0 2 0 0
Preview
Coastal Commission delays decision on Diablo Canyon as debate over California’s energy future continues The debate over California’s energy future and the role of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant continues. State regulators are pressing Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E;), the plant’s operator, to make stronger environmental commitments.

Coastal Commission delays decision on Diablo Canyon as debate over California’s energy future continues www.kcbx.org/environment-and-energy/2... #CAEnergy #Nuclear #PCG

0 0 0 0
Preview
Trump wants oil drilling off the coast of California. But does anyone else? An oil trade group said drilling off Southern California was of interest. But the environmental pushback would be considerable.

Trump wants #oil drilling off the coast of #California. No one else does - Los Angeles Times www.latimes.com/environment/story/2025-1... #ClimateChange #Decarbonization #CAEnergy

0 0 0 0
Rooftop solar lawsuit sets historic precedent holding California utility regulators accountable For decades, California courts gave the policy decisions of state utility regulators unparalleled deference.

California Supreme Court Sides with Rooftop #Solar www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2025/... #CPUC #CAEnergy #PV #NEM

0 0 0 0