PNAS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
Authorship decisions should be anchored in the inseparable principles of credit, accountability and transparency.
Credit entails accountability and accountability entails credit. Transparency is required because authorship practices must evolve with research practices. doi.org/10.1073/pnas...
12.03.2026 08:22
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
New on the blog! In an interview with Veronique Kiermer @verokiermer.bsky.social, Chief Scientific Officer for @plos.org, she provides insight into their approach to data sharing, visibility and evaluation.
π Read the post: makedatacount.org/read-our-blo...
#dataevaluation #datasharing
02.12.2025 16:03
π 5
π 5
π¬ 0
π 1
A ten-year drive to credit authors for their work β and why thereβs still more to do
Information about the roles of each author of a paper can help to build trust, integrity and responsible research assessment. Coordinated efforts are needed to consolidate progress.
10 years since CRediT was introduced, >20% adoption (of full text in Dimensions). Now, we need to build on this to comprehensively integrate CRediT in metadata and make sure the taxonomy evolves to remain fit for purpose. doi.org/10.1038/d415...
W/ @sjcporter.bsky.social Liz Allen Ruth Whitman
29.11.2025 16:41
π 22
π 12
π¬ 0
π 4
Science becomes trustworthy by constantly questioning itself
What happens when the greatest strengths of science, such as openness, humility, self-criticism and self-correction, are exploited for political gain? This Perspective calls for scientists to affirm t...
My new PLOS Bio piece about when one's work is misrepresented: "[T]here is a normative expectation within scholarly research that all parties are well-intentioned and truth-seeking...when invitations to engage genuinely are not accepted..scholarly discourse is ill-equipped to resolve the conflict."
04.08.2025 12:15
π 42
π 14
π¬ 5
π 3
Science becomes trustworthy by constantly questioning itself
What happens when the greatest strengths of science, such as openness, humility, self-criticism and self-correction, are exploited for political gain? This Perspective calls for scientists to affirm t...
In a thought-provoking @plosbiology.org Perspective article,
@briannosek.bsky.social asks whether scienceβs openness can be used against it, looking at how transparency and self-skepticism might be reframed in todayβs discourse around golden standards
plos.io/4l8rNuE
#OpenScience π§ͺ
11.08.2025 11:49
π 16
π 9
π¬ 0
π 0
π¨Still time to register. "Unconferences" are fun. And this one is about Responsible Research in Action, even better! A great opportunity to dig deep into important issues with people from different horizons.
14.08.2025 21:24
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Really excited to see this new partnership between MetaROR and PLOS Biology π @metaror.bsky.social @plosbiology.org
14.08.2025 16:40
π 9
π 4
π¬ 0
π 0
PLOS ONE metadata forms the basis of our study's Figure 1. We could only study PLOS ONE because PLOS made this metadata freely available (and in bulk XML, no less)!
Information is only useful if it is accessible!
plos.org/text-and-dat...
13.08.2025 22:27
π 8
π 4
π¬ 2
π 0
Thanks, Reese. We're glad the data can be used for important studies like yours. "Open" at work. While we had already addressed some issues, you help us uncover more and give us more tools. It takes a village!
14.08.2025 13:46
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Restoring Gold Standard Science
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7301 of title 5, United
tl;dr β this EO co-opts the language of open science to implement a system of political control wherein presidential appointees are given broad latitude to designate any number of reasonable scientific activities and inferences as scientific misconduct, and to penalize those involved accordingly.
24.05.2025 21:27
π 2469
π 1059
π¬ 101
π 106
Rethinking How We Publish to Support Open Science
Click on the article title to read more.
Newly published Perspective on why we should rethink publishing to support #openscience with @niamhoconnor73.bsky.social @amudditt.bsky.social itt.bsky.social It gives the context that led us @plos.org to embark on a research & design project with support from GBMF and RWJF
bit.ly/44of6af
14.04.2025 14:52
π 6
π 0
π¬ 1
π 2
π¨Submission deadline is approaching for the #EinsteinFoundationAward for Promoting Quality in Research. A prestigious and unique award recognizing efforts to improve research rigor, reliability and transparency. Three categories: three opportunities to nominate research heroes!
09.04.2025 19:58
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
C.D.C. Cuts Threaten to Set Back the Nationβs Health, Critics Say
What remains of the CDC after Tuesdayβs cuts is a hobbled agency, with a smaller global footprint, devoting fewer resources to environmental health, occupational health and disease prevention.
www.nytimes.com/2025/04/02/h...
02.04.2025 20:29
π 176
π 59
π¬ 12
π 8
Couldnβt agree more. Thanks for this thoughtful commentary.
27.03.2025 06:53
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Very insightful piece by @ludowaltman.bsky.social on why publishing reform requires assessment reform AND vice versa. Coordination is crucial.
27.03.2025 06:44
π 7
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
Vaccine skeptic hired to head federal study of immunizations and autism
A long-discredited researcher and vaccine skeptic will conduct a government study on whether vaccines cause autism.
Seismic scoop from @lenasun.bsky.social: A long-time anti-vaxer who was disciplined for practising medicine without a license has been selected by #HHS to conduct the study RFK Jr. wants looking yet again at whether vaccines cause autism. www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/...
25.03.2025 23:15
π 513
π 236
π¬ 27
π 49
Why we need to go βbeyond the articleβ to transform research - The Official PLOS Blog
Over the course of 18 months, we are working on an ambitious new project to Redefine Publishing. Working with stakeholders from acrossβ¦
We've started a consultation with academic leaders to understand how publishing a more complete record of research can support better recognition and rewards for researchers. Great to see a lot of alignment in our first workshop. theplosblog.plos.org/2025/03/why-...
26.03.2025 07:21
π 5
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Once again a splendid line up of winners for this important award. The focus of the Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in Research is unique yet so important. If you can, join the live stream to honor the winners!
12.03.2025 08:24
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Congratulations! Fantastic to see bioRxiv and medRxiv going from strength to strength.
11.03.2025 19:12
π 6
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
openRxiv has arrived!
Weβre thrilled to announce the launch of openRxiv as an independent, researcher-led nonprofit to oversee bioRxiv and medRxiv, the worldβs leading preprint servers for life and health sciences.
openrxiv.org/introducing-...
#openRxiv #OpenScience #Preprints #bioRxiv #medRxiv
11.03.2025 13:18
π 407
π 231
π¬ 3
π 18
Rethinking How Research is Reviewed, Curated, and Communicated
MetaROR uses the publish-review-curate model to share work in the field of metaresearch. In this Q and A, Moumita Koley and AndrΓ© Brasil discuss the platform in the context of a scholarly publishing s...
We (AIMOS and RORI) launched a metascience platform, MetaROR.org, several months ago π. Submit your metascience-related preprints and get peer reviews! AndrΓ© Brasil articulates the vision here, reflecting the hard work he's done to get the platform working for us. katinamagazine.org/content/arti...
11.03.2025 00:58
π 13
π 13
π¬ 0
π 0
More on the NIH termination of vaccine hesitancy studies.
11.03.2025 00:43
π 350
π 114
π¬ 8
π 5
Thank you for all the input so far on the Metascience Alliance! A wide range of perspectives is crucial for informing future development.
π£οΈ Please continue to share this call. The feedback form is open through 3/16/25. (See further info in the thread below.)
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
05.03.2025 18:41
π 10
π 6
π¬ 0
π 0