The McDonald’s tie in game had me hooked. I was so pumped for
It. Marketing worked wonders on the under 12 market segment

And yet sometimes support is your only choice when Amazon tells you they destroyed your package in transport and to contact them for a refund. Somehow that can’t be automated by the system despite the fact that it knows it destroyed your item after you paid for it but before it gave you it.

Last time it gave me bones sure, but I feel good about my chances this time.

What was good about the original? I remember it fondly as the first movie I saw that made me realize that not every movie is one I want to watch. And maybe there are something’s that can ruin the enjoyment of popcorn and candy.

There are different kinds of infinity.

Molly is great and transcends your slop. You need to literally say at every step when talking about crypto how fraudulent every part of it is. There are no two truths. She nails it, revel fails to heed her warning.

This story was a plant by SBF and hai parents to try and put the blame on someone anyone else. His blatantly false statements do unchallenged in the reporting.

I don’t understand the point of your journalism. Gullible investors invested in a fraud and lost it, but got some money back. All the ire in the reporting is focused on the bankruptcy instead of those who actually committed the fraud.

Terrible podcast, just terrible malpractice of journalism. It really really goes light on SBF and FTX. It was a terribly run company with no controls. I don’t think they even looked into the shit show that was ftx, and just focused on the bankruptcy.

I’ve heard Micheal Stipe makes house calls, but personally I’m all but certain he’s out of network for my hmo.

What if we are the issue? Do we get a subscription?

Without disclosing timing or location, as a civilian I got a un peacekeeping force to defend some innocents.

This is all part of the creative process. That and the spice pillar full of unlabeled spices.

This is why I have a paprika section in my spice cabinet. There are also cinnamon, and chili powder sections.

Same. This has to be the first one that I already know the answer from personal experience.

Christians are supposed to support the down and out. No baseball team is worse than the Sox.

This is the kind of posts you get medals for 🥇

I’m holding my copy of the book right now, but strangely I find his views compelling. The book, doesn’t seem like it should exist.

“If they can hit New York they can hit anywhere “

“They used a plane to do it, sometimes planes fly over us!!!”

“They went to aviation school, we have schools here too, we need to ban Muslims from schools!”

So many racist dumb takes. I stood against all of them but the idiots wouldn’t listen.

Idk why she’s afraid Trump obviously learned his lesson last time, right?

Obviously, you save sharks with helicopters and monster trucks, when you aren’t busy impressing beautiful women by rescuing beached whales by removing golf balls from their blow holes. Also nunchucks are used to save penguins from climate change, for obvious reasons.

God damn pitchfork goes hard.

Because of things like this he has said and done his entire life.

You jerk, now I can’t not hear it
as an accordion led piece.

Kindly learn us English before trying to scam people.

Seriously? You’re just saying that to be argumentative. You should judge them by the accuracy of the models results in comparison to others. But not by how much money they made.

Yeah he did. I think that’s actually a ok result. Sports Gambling is more than just raw analytic skill. I wouldn’t judge data scientists skill by sports betting prowess.

And as I was trying to say earlier. It’s very possible that we are talking about two different subsets of reactions to his work. I’m reacting to very crude opinion based criticism that I saw all over twitter. If you saw more scholarly criticism, then we saw different reactions.

Well, if you couldn’t tell from my first post, I am 100% not a fan. But because I don’t agree with his opinions, it doesn’t mean that I don’t appreciate his work on its merits. If someone your trust doesn’t. Then we disagree. No need for name calling.