Difficult, yes. But it was fone, repeatedly, even in the US.
But nobody seems to even try in earnest.
10.03.2026 19:04
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Difficult, yes. But it was fone, repeatedly, even in the US.
But nobody seems to even try in earnest.
Cynical take: You have nowhere else to go, because there is no other viable opposition in the US with universal enough appeal. Isolated single issue groups will not expand to catch enough votes and are not even trying because it would mean compromises / adding "buts" to their one single issue.
So where are any real alternatives?
It is popular to unload on the Democratic party, but if the people are so deeply dissatisfied with them, that should be a hotbed for a new movement.
Where is it? What is the core message?
AΕΎ tak ne - z tΔchto skupin mΓ‘ GOP ty extrΓ©mnΔjΕ‘Γ, z bΓlΓ½ch je tam i spousta normΓ‘lnΓch lidΓ co "se nezajΓmajΓ o politiku" a "hlasujΓ jen kvΕ―li danΓm".
Half a league, half a league,
Half a league onward,
All in the valley of excursion
Rode the six hundred.
βForward, the Light Brigade!
Charge for the guns!β he said.
Into the valley of excursion
Rode the six hundred.
More importantly you will have daily scheduled public professions of hate towards select public enemy of the day.
Nah. She would have been a pretty much middle of the line President hobbled by a narrow margin in Congress and likely a minority in the Senate, she would not have inclination or power for any radical steps.
HOWEVER...
I doubt y'all will be in any of the current hot messes.
If you ever struggled with an impostor syndrome...
"Captain's log. Stardate 41153.7. Iran is two weeks away from nuclear bomb..."
Good thing you Congress is not alive to hear rhat.
Macinkovi to asi i pΕeloΕΎili, ale moΕΎnΓ‘ jeΕ‘tΔ ΕΎije v iluzi, ΕΎe Trump znΓ‘ vΓ½raz slova "pΕΓtel " a ΕΎe on jΓm je...
But will they react by "I don't want this, so let's do something"? Or by "I may not like this, but politics is too confusing and I don't care about that and besides both sides and besides the guy in the TV says this is fault of other countries so what can we do..."?
TBH people who voted for him are less of a problem than people who did not vote and now skirt on the "Not my responsibility" wave. It's the "I don't care about politics" the authoritarians ride on.
Translation: "We thought we were supposed to get this oil!"
Good thing the Congress is not alive to see it.
That is something GOP worked out and on for decades and it paid off, while Democratic voters tend to grant slim majorities for presidential election year and then log off for midterms and let the GOP have it for a prolonged time. You need to build margins in your voting block.
No. The trick is to have enough votes in the first place that whatever you want does not hinge on two or three people with questionable leanings.
Because that then means the few firebrands you already have can work on getting actual majorities - that will in turn demonstrate it can be done.
"The dems" did, or "the Senator who was widely praised as the next best Progressive thing by Democratic Socialists" did? ;)
The trick is getting enough votes in both chambers that few individuals dropping out will not kill the things you want. MAGAs got the idea, you did not as it seems.
Shrug. If it was "wrong AI information", does not remove the guilt from people approving and executing the strike. It just puts it on the AI company as well.
So after launching a war to distract from Epstein Files now Epstein Files are going to be released to distract from the war?
Remind me who spent years and hundreds of hours on Benghazi? :D
"I don't say this, but a number of Evangelical preachers supporting MAGA do..."
"I don't say this, but a number of Evangelical preachers supporting MAGA do..."
As it is, y'all now have launched into a religious war against Iran and I kinda do not see all of the "Both sides are the same" folks doing... Anything. Except actually still attacking Democrats more than Trump and still claiming they'd rather stay home.
If you could not get over that, you are part of the reason you have... Pretty much the exact opposite. You may not have gotten the Universal Healthcare, you would not have had people kicked off Medicare. You may not sort out world hunger, you would not have actively made it worse.
If there was enough demand for it, there would bea viable third party. They can emerge even in majority systems.
There is not. If you want to get your dream policies, you need to get the votes where it matters.
If you don't, you own the result. Again... Your Utopia was not on the ticket.
Shrug. Yes, if there is no other choice in your district, or you will end up without voting power and steamrolled by the R's.
You may not like it, but if your paragons of virtue do not have large enough margin of votes they will do nothing. You need enough votes few missing will not sink you.
Would hitting the plane with one missile and then the wreckage with a second count as two kills?
