!!?!#%#?!
[falls over dead]
11.03.2026 02:20
👍 30
🔁 2
💬 4
📌 0
!!?!#%#?!
[falls over dead]
Amazing!!! Congratulations!!!
FWIW, this echoes a misquote that I caught in the Minnesota case I covered this morning — www.lawdork.com/p/posse-comi... — relating to the text of a federal law.
This lawyer is getting torched. 🔥🔥🔥
🎯🎯🎯
And there it is.
Background information here:
Get vaccinated. For the babies
BREAKING: Former military lawyers say use of JAG lawyers in Minnesota violates the Posse Comitatus Act.
Although recent litigation has focused on troop deployments to American cities, a new challenge in Minnesota looks at DOJ's use of JAG lawyers in non-military cases.
New, at Law Dork:
A win for academic freedom.
Being a professor is a tough job because we have a lot of competing pressures, but remember that we have an obligation to govern ourselves.
www.thecrimson.com/article/2026...
So an admission that the SAVE act is entirely about suppressing Dem votes.
That is distressing to me personally, but not as surprising as Elvis. Now I have to ask my (adult) kids if they've heard of Cary Grant.
Yikes
Your brief before partner comments, your brief after partner comments.
I picked human every time. Mostly I could tell the difference, but even on the one I wasn't sure, I still chose the sample written by a human. I seem to be an outlier based on the results.
I'm curious if my preference stems from being an avid reader. I'd love to see how others do.
This is incredible
BREAKING: Judge Brann has ejected the new leaders of the NJ U.S. attorney's office, once again finding the Trump administration is illegally attempting to circumvent Senate confirmation.
He says this could result in dismissals of indictments.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
We know a lot is going on right now, but we just realized that:
cabinet/board/panel = things made of wood
cabinet/board/panel = terms for organizations
An important limit on using AI to do legal history research: Here, my request was to have Claude (Opus 4.6 extended) find early cases on search & seizure, but it kept running into paywalls and other barriers that made it ultimately unable to do it in a useful way.
Is this "the most severe ENERGY crisis since the 1970s"? Or is it the most severe OIL crisis since the 1970s?
1/The failure to investigate Renee Good’s death at all is ongoing scandal. The independent autopsy suggests that Renee Good was still alive after the first shot; it was the third shot that killed her, www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news....
These asshole twerps with no brains or education from DOGE really did use ChatGPT to find NEH grants to terminate ILLEGALLY - ruining hundreds lives and destroying hundreds of the greatest humanities projects and partnerships of our time. I’m overwhelmed with rage and anger all over again.
I’m involved in a case where there is a pro se party filing 3-4 things a day that essentially say the same thing on repeat. As soon as I saw the pro se’s filing here, I knew the pro se in my case was using ChatGPT. Exact same structure and tone. Now I know why they keep filing over and over
Losing is a weird word for not completing a puzzle, I agree.
Federal district judges have threatened DOJ lawyers with contempt over violated court orders time and again.
Why haven't they followed through?
Badge for completing NYT Connections 365 consecutive days without losing.
So this happened.
Watch Drive to Survive. Also, the book The Formula gives a great overview of the history and developments up to the last couple of years.
Finally finished Harrow the Ninth (delayed by my travels) and I’m going to start How to Read a Book by Monica Wood. Watching Shrinking.
I'm honored to be publishing this piece with Vanderbilt Psych Prof Sarah Brown-Schmidt in volume 112 of the Virginia Law Review. In this empirical evidence law and cognitive science article, we identify the risks posed by "hear-witnesses" who inaccurately recall and recount statements at trial.