No. You seem quite dim about it.
23.02.2026 03:14
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
No. You seem quite dim about it.
Yudkowsky will never be vindicated
It had its moments early on.
Why is that funny?
I wrote a simple guide for getting started with Neo4j Graph Database exploration. We explore a Knowledge Graph of 30 years of Artificial Life research references! Please read and learn along with me! This is useful in Data Science and AI Engineering.🧪
100daysofnetworks.substack.com/p/day-52-of-...
Isn’t that Vogue’s value proposition?
What are you talking about?
Bc this is what I’m talking about:
arxiv.org/list/cs.AI/r...
Explore flow-lenia parameters:
developmentalsystems.org/Exploring-Fl...
#ALife2025
Another popular press book I thoroughly enjoyed reading as a grad student in the 1990s www.amazon.com/Artificial-L... #artificiallife #digitalbiology
lol you discard the opinion of an entire academic discipline?
Sounds like MAGA.
Epic.
Is there more? Response seems uninformative.
LOL I work with top brass on the regular. Imagine they are thrilled with this time waster.
It’s just gender neutral fitness standards?
This needed an in-person meeting?
it is occasionally exhausting to be in the party that tends to attract people with generalized anxiety disorder
Correct. If by centrism you mean running candidates closer to the partisan preference of their district.
The only way to change the direction of the ratchet is for the left to show it can win away from its home turf.
🇬🇧🇺🇸💥📈 UK & US forge a "major partnership" in a "new 'golden age' of nuclear power"! This deal aims to boost reactor construction and fast-track approvals in both nations. "Energy superpower mission" in full swing!
Source
Some important findings in this paper:
1) Working with AI boosts the performance of people solving math, science & ethics questions
2) The biggest boost is for the hardest problems
3) High performers remain highest performing, but low performers gain more
4) People who are good with AI gain most
Maybe.But it is conceivable that there might not be “better AI.” If all representations made on the same data are convergent than it is possible that human intelligence is about as smart as it gets. Faster and mass produced human intelligence might be the best we can do. Which is still pretty good.
Is the best analytic framework to answer this question.
Yeah doubt it. If AIs are all learning the same representations as each other (Convergent representation hypothesis) and this representation is more or less the same as what most humans learn, I don’t think that an analysis predicated on genius ( which is not required or even necessarily desirable)
You clearly don’t know his background if you are saying that.
good.
It’s rare these days. But it’s at least possible.
I have no idea if messages have been massaged or altered somehow. But I think we need to face the possibility that they are genuine.
We should see what the kids roommate/lover has to say about them.
My son.
Semiotic forensics expert on the case.
You totally are.
