Ad

So maybe naming it “neurodivergent art” puts it in a smaller box than it deserves.
Maybe it’s a kind of trap:

If we centre the ND lens too tightly, we risk flattening it.
We reduce it to diagnosis. We imply that the genius comes from the wiring, not the person.

Because the show, or season 1 at least, isn’t about being neurodivergent.

It’s about what it means to try and be a person, while terrified of getting it wrong.

Yes, that overlaps with ND experience.

But it’s not owned by it.

The pain is universal. The mechanism is specific.

Here’s the thing:
What if neurodivergence is actually the least interesting part of this story?

Not irrelevant.
Not untrue.
But maybe—beside the point.

Less “who can get you on the panel.”
More “who’s helping you build your own protocol.”

Weird. Exciting. Possibly the end of me.

#representation #protocols #creatorownership #Bluesky

If identity is portable and audiences aren’t locked inside apps, the job shifts.

Managers stop being gatekeepers and start becoming…. ecosystem architects? Co-Designing how talent owns their space, tools, and revenue flow.

Been thinking about how Bluesky—and protocol-based platforms more broadly—might reshape talent management.

What if representation isn’t about access anymore?