Peering at the peers, as it were?
Peering at the peers, as it were?
Any guesses about the varieties? #roses
Iβll throw the question open.
Do you recognise either? The red one is famous and French.
When we had northern visitors at the Centre for Time in Sydney, I used to mention that because we were the Southern Hemisphere, the sun would rise in the West.
My wonderful colleague Poppy Mankowitz is advertising two 3-yr postdocs & one funded PhD on her ERC project Expressing Value in Language, which investigates evaluative adjectives (βgoodβ, βbadβ, βbeautifulβ, βtastyβ, etc.) from the perspective of philosophy & theoretical & experimental linguistics.
A rose with small yellow flowers
A rose with a large red flower, covered with raindrops
@martinkusch.bsky.social Autumn in the mountains.
Australian friends might consider signing this.
Huw can really put a Price on a good pun?
"""
nonFACTuality, as we might call it
"""
--- a man who writes with the correct level of seriousness for the matter at hand
Well put. Donβt Fawcett, as one might say. (When we were kids in Wiltshire our dentists were Crook & Fawcett.)
Hereβs @craigfrench.bsky.socialβs Dad on a fiver β long overdue recognition, I expect.
US visa denial policy makes continued basing of the UN there untenable. Same for World Bank, IMF and any international organization.
I bet the pomologists think that about your papers! :)
Thanks!
Who is/was Krennikov? Hereβs my current take on underlying structure β see also the longer piece cited with @kenwharton.bsky.social
arxiv.org/abs/2602.16985
We logicians have got this covered:
(β!a)(β!b)(From the a to the b, Palestine shall be free)
Interesting piece here, citing among other folk the excellent @danwphilosophy.bsky.social
I was in a 2 hour briefing today on the Iran War. All the briefings are closed, because Trump can't defend this war in public.
I obviously can't disclose classified info, but you deserve to know how incoherent and incomplete these war plans are.
1/ Here's what I can share:
Chris Murphy: "I Just came from a two hour, closed door classified briefing on the war. It just confirmed to me it's totally incoherent. We are not gonna be able to achieve any of our stated objectives ... this is a disaster of epic proportions, a 10 day debacle"
Boosting this for the link to Tony Leggettβs 1977 piece. It contains a very early and little-known discussion of Bellβs Theorem β by, as we know, a future star. #quantum #philsci #philsky
Another time I was waiting with him in a US airport, after a meeting. He went to a desk with some query, and was having trouble being understood. The person on the desk gave me a look that meant βAre you the brains of this outfit?β I wanted to say, βMaβam, heβs the one with a Nobel Prize!β
He was still toying with it decades later, though characteristicly tentatively. I was once on a panel with him chaired by @seanmcarroll.bsky.social. Tony gave a very tentative answer to some question about QM, and Sean said, βTony, youβre the one with a Nobel Prize!β #quantum #philsci
Sad news about Tony Leggett, who was a lovely man. I first came across him in a 1977 book The Encyclopaedia of Ignorance. He was the first author I ever discovered who toyed with the idea of a retrocausal approach to EPR-Bell. Full piece here, extract in the image.
drive.google.com/file/d/1zFaR...
Beautiful! And a lot more natural than they usually are when viewed from an Australian perspective.
We face two urgent challenges concerning consciousness and AI. Challenge One is that millions of users will soon misattribute human-like consciousness to AI friends, partners, and assistants on the basis of mimicry and role-play, and we donβt know how to prevent this. Challenge Two is that profoundly alien forms of consciousness might genuinely be achieved in AI, but our theoretical understanding of consciousness is too immature to provide confident answers one way or the other. Centrism about AI consciousness is the position that we must take both challenges seriously. The two challenges interact in ways that make this difficult. Steps to address Challenge One might undermine attempts to address Challenge Two by portraying the idea of conscious AI as impossible or inherently unlikely. Conversely, attempts to address Challenge Two might lead to higher levels of misattribution from ordinary users. This βmanifestoβ attempts to construct mutually consistent strategies for addressing both challenges.
Since people are doing "is AI conscious?" discourse on here again I feel like this philpapers.org/rec/BIRACA-4 by @birchlse.bsky.social remains my favourite piece on the current state of affairs.
Wrote for @thenation.com about how catastrophic the Iran war could be for Israel's grip on US politicsβand why this is a moment to be seized for anyone who wants the US-Israel alliance to end. www.thenation.com/article/worl...
I remember a case when the clock dropped off the wall, hitting the candidate. Subtle but effective.
This year's Adolf GrΓΌnbaum Memorial Lecture will be given by Professor Wayne Myrvold. Visit our website for more information: https://www.centerphilsci.pitt.edu/event/annual-lecture-series-wayne-c-myrvold/ #philsci
How shameful this is after what we did to Afghanistan. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
As glaciers retreat from the Arctic to the Andes, ReykjavΓk is stepping up!
The worldβs northernmost capital has endorsed the call for a #FossilFuelTreaty, joining nearly 150 cities worldwide and adding momentum to a proposal already backed by 18 countries.