Rachel Navarre

You can go back and compare how 🇦🇫 was covered, & it’s simply not remotely the same right now, even though the failure & incompetence is orders of magnitude beyond even the worst caricature of Biden’s policies:

He’s into the idea of good breeding and bloodlines in a British aristocrat from 1897 way. Once you know that, you’ll see he mentions it in almost every speech. A person might wonder how superior his genes could be if all his kids had to buy their chins, but but that’s probably none of my business.

It’s amazing to read. Anything that isn’t exactly for him is oppression. You not buying his 2K “seminar”? Oppression. Him literally destroying your ability to earn a living in anything because of your gender? Fair play.

Weird way to write they’re going to have the intern— sorry the 23 year old Director of Something - just ask Grok.

The reporter doesn’t let this pastor (who is also a grifter)- or the reader off the hook. But it is fascinating how the pastor thinks “forcing” the FBI flying a flag = stopping gay marriage/forcing women to stay at home. If all oppression is bad, his beliefs require exponentially more of it.

I think it’s the Trump being a bully that only respects strength. He’s going to keep Miller around till he annoys him or it’s convenient to throw him under the bus but he hates that dude. (And he’s bald? You know Trump thinks that’s bad genes).

At least they aren’t gold 🤷🏻‍♀️

If that’s the case (which it’s highly probable it is) by giving in you’re just setting yourself for future humiliation. What is the point of gaining power if you’re just going to pretend you don’t have any?

Why are these gotdamn dipshits so bad at everything?

There’s a lot dumb in this. Like the most “manly” response is to LBJ it. Like full on whip it out and stare him dead in the eye and be like now you’ve seen it, can we do actual work now? But if you lack a spine, ORDER THE SHOES IN THE CORRECT SIZE. Wear those. Oh yeah boss working good, love em.

Ah, glad I didn’t either! I figured it was something lost in translation (given the „ punctuation) plus the problem of tone on the internet. I get it now.
- I basically read the tone all wrong.

Excellent commentary. As a non-tenured prof in a red state I'm acutely aware of the risks I take in teaching certain concepts. But, many tenured profs are indifferent to free speech and politicians are aware that that lack of solidarity can be exploited to marginalize and dismiss those who speak up

So there’s this guy, Ted Cruz, whose big thing was that Obama was acting like a dictator and ignoring Congressional intent on immigration. He has a lot of speeches about it and it was nothing compared to this. He’s going to lose his mind when he sees what the President is doing now.

Connected with the last quote skeet where the NYTimes was saying some in Mexico “might not oppose” Trump’s intervention. This is what that intervention looks like.

Maybe you should actually read it. It appears English might not be your first language so maybe you missed that I was using hyperbole to show how ridiculous the article I quote skeeted sounds.

God if only. Just like 1/10th even. It’s be luxury gay space communism for as far as the eye can see.

OH NO MAJOR TYPO. Oh well. It’s sunny and we’re in Trump’s America. My screw up is now your problem. You’re welcome. Cofeveee or whatever.

Ignoring the fact Trump’s MO is perfect for helping corrupt groups entrench themselves, a third reason not to ask them for help is they only care about “winning”. If they cleared out the cartel *and* the civilian population, they’d consider it a wash bc who cares? They won, didn’t they?

“If” is doing a lot of work here. “I’d be for nuclear war if it meant nobody died and it eradicated all cancers and malaria” doesn’t mean I supposed nuclear war currently because none of those ifs are true.

Also no they aren’t. My god they’re trying to lower the cost of gas right now which personally, cool thanks, but politically are y’all dumb?

I was going to add we don’t talk about evil wizards, but then I remembered Edwin Edward’s quote about David Duke, “only thing we have in common is we’re both wizards under the sheets” and have you read some of the stuff the right wing populists parties say?

Oh god, not only were the sequels right, they basically were my book. (My book doesn’t have jar-jar however.)

John Hopkins, come get your girl.

We’d know for sure who Cato was by whoever got up and started rubbing it in Hamilton/Madison’s faces.

The bright side is maybe we’ll stop using our Social Security numbers as identity markers now but until then you might want to go freeze your Social Security number

Also is mold remediation on the list?

Hahahahahabaha

True.

Just imagine if you could tell the founders that the Secretary of ***WAR*** just said that it was up to the president if this was the beginning, middle, or end of the war.