Returning to bluesky to tell you one of the best albums of 2026 will be this baby keem album. 7 songs in and this is already a classic: www.youtube.com/live/VYp1-GV...
Returning to bluesky to tell you one of the best albums of 2026 will be this baby keem album. 7 songs in and this is already a classic: www.youtube.com/live/VYp1-GV...
Large Labubu Model
Corner solutions revisited
New policies aimed at increasing energy affordability could make prices worse. β‘π
In a recent If/Then blog, RFF research finds that rolling back clean energy incentives could create more volatility in energy markets and raise costs.
Read more: www.resources.org/common-resou...
Calling all transit fans! Let your voice be heard. π
Β
π³οΈ Vote on the exterior design for our new 8000-series rail fleet! Voting will close at 11:59 PM on August 22. Winning concept will be announced next week.Β
Β
Vote before time runs out: wmata.questionpro.com/a/TakeSurvey...
Insightful @ucenergyinstitute.bsky.social post from @severinborenstein.bsky.social on California refineries. It'll get you up to speed on the facts, opportunities, and tensions as the California legislative session begins this week.
energyathaas.wordpress.com/2025/08/18/c...
Great opening figure!
Spent so much time writing about clean air act repeal that I forgot to replace my air purifiers! We are going the direct air capture route because the actors below refuse to install scrubbers.
Not in the current version. The goal here is to illustrate the wholesale price volatility of fossil dependent grids. We want to dive deeper into the uncertainty effects on retail prices at the state level, but it requires more specific institutional details about uitlities and RTOs/ISOs. One day!
New paper from EPRI and Epoch AI: Frontier AI training runs are projected to consume 1-2 gigawatts each by 2028 and exceed 4 GW per run by 2030 (up from ~100-150 MW today)
all my homies live in a low dimensional feature subspace
New blog post with my colleague on how new policy decisions expose fossil dependent grids to greater electricity price uncertainty.
www.resources.org/common-resou...
Also includes analysis of OBBBA and OBBBA + CPS repeal impacts on household electricity expenditures. We also incorporate more recent electricity demand projections that EPA excluded from their analysis.
For those curious about the impacts of EPAs Carbon Pollution Standard repeal.
www.rff.org/publications...
TLDR:
- health + climate damages > savings in compliance costs
- health damages outweigh compliance cost savings 2-4x.
- health + climate damages outweigh compliance cost savings 4-8x.
I think one mental model of renewables was that the government had anywhere from neutral to positive association with them. I think this is the first time weβre seeing direct opposition to this technology in the US in such open ways. We donβt really know what comes of that
State carbon markets are the policy laboratory for US climate policy we all should be watching. Especially as we watch federal support for carbon emissions reductions evaporate.
Federal climate action is slowing, but states are using emissions trading systems to cut emissions and raise state revenue. RFF Research Associate Nicholas Roy explains how in this new In Focus video π
What does the One Big "Beautiful" Bill mean for the US energy transition, household and business energy costs, electricity supplies and emissions? We've published a quick summary report of our findings here: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... #OBBB
ππ‘
This Op-Ed on a U.S. carbon tariff gets lots of basic stuff wrong.
Unlike authors' claims, a U.S. carbon tariff
1. Won't address PRC competition
2. Either raises lots of revenue or lowers GHGs (not both)
3. Weakens incentives to adopt domestic U.S. climate policy. π§΅ 1/
#econsky #climatesky
I agree with all of Kyleβs critiques and would add 2 more:
1. The piece cites Australia and Canada as countries where voters rejected carbon prices, but thatβs not true. In AUS itβs called a βsafeguard mechanismβ and was put in place in 2023. CAN kept the price for industries the focus of the piece
the 2028 phaseout is under commence construction instead of placed in service like the house bill. Big deal!
Senate Finance text is out. Solar and wind out by 2028 except one weird carveout. Batteries keep full ITC /PTC and expanded component eligibility in 45X?
(Text keeps transferability but gets rid of 5-year MACRS depreciation on *all* zero-emissions tech. Bad for clean firm!)
Read the full paper here: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adt5665
Or the two-page summary: restservice.epri.com/publicattach...
Or the tl;dr thread: bsky.app/profile/bist...
@aafawcett.bsky.social @jessedjenkins.com @nicholasroy.me @aliciaszhao.bsky.social
With @cagovernornewsom.bsky.social's budget out, CA cap-and-trade reauthorization is fully underway.
Today, we release a UCSB emLab analysis showing how C&T revenue can significantly lower California's too-high retail electricity prices.
Exec summary, paper, online calculator below.
Short π§΅1/
UCSB researchers just released a great analysis of how to use the state's cap-and-trade program revenues to invest in energy affordability. 1 pager, policy brief, and online calculator are all great tools! emlab.ucsb.edu/projects/usi...
I think "baffling" rhetoric is what he is muddying more so than the politics (of course there is some of that too). It is a risky experiment that could be justified if there is meaningful policy progress. I share your skepticism but am optimistic that meaningful outcomes could materialize.
This was a great breakdown of the political economy in California. Another element to this is the national stage of Newsom v. Trump creating a "your with us or against us" vibe to California legislating. Second order to what you describe, but courageous leadership (from either side) could elevate it
Great thread unraveling right now that is breaking down the political history of California's cap-and-trade and how we got to today's reauthorization.
Wow. I am waiting with bated breath.
Many are saying the current reconciliation proposal is equivalent to a full repeal of the IRA. We analyzed the repeal of clean electricity tax credits in an earlier issue brief.
Household, fiscal, and emissions impacts all included!
www.rff.org/publications...
Great points! Ultimately I guess it matters less given the extent of FEOC and other restrictions.
Iβm still not sure transferability is hindered substantially if it werenβt for additional restrictions placed on these credits.