Susan Nordmark

This sounds riveting.

new study. yes.

there's no 'we' here.

unwilling. unwilling. unwilling.

charismatic and brilliant she's not. i predict she doesn't hold onto an audience.

no. they are immune. most adults had it, or were vaccinated. you wouldn't want that anyway. they would endanger others.

no. for the nutters, it's not about money. stop thinking that way. it's religious thinking driving them.

that theory is used for many problems and it really isn't supportable. the anti-vcxx people aren't logical. they're driven by myths.

he couldn't have paid her himself. he's never been good enough at anything to make lots of $. someone did it for him. who? what happens when you put a figurehead in place who is in every way unqualified and a walking degradation of every value the military brass truly holds. and they know it.

this is it. they don't know *but don't care either.* it's their biggest diss to the american people and the world.

he doesn't know what happened. i actually believe that.

he's reading text. but he's not pronouncing what he's reading. somewhere between Wernicke's and Broca's, those words took ninety degree turns.

This. "Deregulate" why? Regulation helps people. When I say "people" I mean regular people, the little people. Unless you are Eleon, you are likely a little person. You don't want a "freedom account." You want health insurance that doesn't eliminate you because you have a history of un-health.

Marilyn Whirlwind, who could be deporting all these petty ICEr punks per her indigeneity of ~22,000 years, was harassed and responded in, of course, a civil and Marilyn-ish manner.

ETTD, Mike.

feminists disapprove. but we always did. social media always underestimates the degree to which right wing W women can hate other women. they identify with W men to a degree that is really clinically sick. most of them probably didn't have a problem with a W man abusing a woman at all.

this is quite possible.

we know all that, people. we know she normalized bad things. in this, she is like many pols, and not just republicans either. but honestly, this one point has been buried by the media: she [and I believe Boebert] did draw a line at child rape. and there are reasons for that. personal, I think.

dying

George, we're hearing you're running for Nadler's seat. Questions: as a D, R, or I? Have your changed your views since you supported Kavanaugh and Gorsuch? And will you support women's rights, including choice into 2nd trimester when detailed medical info becomes available?

he lives in a dream. and in his dreams, people call him Sir.

have you noticed that when he talks about this sort of thing it's always bragging about not what's happening but what he promises WILL happen in future, which never does happen?

internet win for the DAY 🍔

that is an excellent way of saying it. you know, abused women are the only people made to do that.

think about the consequences.

your question is easily answered by other materials that have been released.

what they are communicating to you is who they were when Epstein got his hooks on them. they were unknowing, innocent, confused, lost girls. they were children.

just stay there. don't try to go further. just stay with the children.

as the kids say, Meg, this is not the flex you think.

notably, DT wants to 'feel' like one. so he assumes others do. but he isn't one, except as a crime family head is one.

because the media, including the lefties, who aren't really left but just center-left, is afraid of him and does not really have many whip smart journalists. look, they don't. msnbc is sad, bloated, padded.