Trending
Mal J Brown's Avatar

Mal J Brown

@mjbrown.com

Eclectic rebel, nighthawk, & eco-geek.

181
Followers
248
Following
89
Posts
11.09.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Mal J Brown @mjbrown.com

Video thumbnail

🚨 🚨 Allowing jets at the Island Airport could lead to the loss of over 100 storeys in the planned residential buildings in the Port Lands. It’s a fine example of how jets don’t fit on our waterfront! Read more: ontario.transportaction.ca/wordpress/wp... #topoli #onpoli #cdnpoli

14.03.2026 20:05 👍 24 🔁 10 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Asia rolls out four-day weeks and work-from-home as emergency measures to solve a fuel crisis caused by Iran war | Fortune The energy crunch is forcing governments to adopt extreme measures to save fuel; in Thailand, government employees are being asked to take the stairs.

When bumbling idiots rock the world economy by fucking with petroleum flow, various cultures adapt with new / old patterns of time & energy management. Well, we would have had to adapt sooner or later. Later just came sooner.
Take notes. You'll need them for later.

14.03.2026 21:53 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
ANALYSIS: Toronto has bigger issues than the island airport | TVO Today The city needs to address housing, transit, and homelessness. The premier is focused on convention centres and jets.

“Allowing jets at the airport will impose tighter height limits on developments in the Port Lands — reducing housing potential in one of the few parts of the city where there’s at least the possibility of major new homebuilding at scale.” www.tvo.org/article/anal... #topoli #onpoli

12.03.2026 19:21 👍 27 🔁 13 💬 1 📌 1

If we made the green energy transition this war would be unthinkable and these authoritarians wouldn’t be in power — not in the US, not in Iran, not in Saudi Arabia, not in Russia. Hydrocarbons are killing our freedom and just plain killing us.

15.03.2026 00:07 👍 15197 🔁 4769 💬 333 📌 263
3 panel cartoon: Schrodinger's Dog
1. Walking outdoors alone: On the one hand, I am filled with absolute, unquestioning loyalty, love, & respect for my master & all that he does.
2. Yet simultaneously, I find myself increasingly concerned about his experiment with the cat, the box, & the poison. Is this a paradox?
3. Who am I kidding? I never like that cat anyway. (and wanders out of scene)

3 panel cartoon: Schrodinger's Dog 1. Walking outdoors alone: On the one hand, I am filled with absolute, unquestioning loyalty, love, & respect for my master & all that he does. 2. Yet simultaneously, I find myself increasingly concerned about his experiment with the cat, the box, & the poison. Is this a paradox? 3. Who am I kidding? I never like that cat anyway. (and wanders out of scene)

Schrodinger's Dog.

14.03.2026 23:33 👍 3 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0

When Canada does decide to acquire the Gripen, they NEED to designate it the “FU-47”

09.03.2026 17:26 👍 32 🔁 7 💬 5 📌 1
Post image

There it is. #Atheist

09.03.2026 19:59 👍 18 🔁 11 💬 3 📌 2
Preview
'The new tobacco': The cities banning fossil fuel adverts Cities across the world are clearing their billboards of flight ads, SUVs, cruise ships and petrol cars in an attempt to cut emissions.

www.bbc.com/future/artic...

06.03.2026 19:35 👍 15 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 2
Preview
Congress Is Considering Abolishing Your Right to Be Anonymous Online The bipartisan push to remove anonymity from the internet is ushering in an era of unprecedented mass surveillance and censorship.

"Stripping anonymity from the internet would constitute one of the most sweeping rollbacks of civil rights in recent history. It would allow for unprecedented levels of mass surveillance and censorship, endangering the most marginalized members of society."

05.03.2026 20:27 👍 2160 🔁 1298 💬 202 📌 100
A photograph, in burnt-orange colour tones, of a maple leaf with a heart-shaped hole forms the background of a rectangular image. 19 book covers are arranged in two rows across the bottom. White text at the top reads "Hidden Gems! 19 books by Canadian authors you may never have heard of (but will totally wonder how your bookshelves lived without!) It also provides the date of the promo: March 1st to 15th, only on Itchi.io.

The books involved are as follows:

The Lion
The Erstwhile Tyler Kyle
The Dragon Next Door
River of Crows
Hope is the Thing with Feathers
The Clockwork Empire
Flesh and Bone
Goblin Girl
Moonshadow's Guardian
Your Blood and Bones
Winner Takes All
The Flaws of Gravity
Scrap Metal Angel
Destined to be Normal
Clipped
Bloody Spade
Baker Thief
Path of the Warrior
Prince Ewald the Brave

A photograph, in burnt-orange colour tones, of a maple leaf with a heart-shaped hole forms the background of a rectangular image. 19 book covers are arranged in two rows across the bottom. White text at the top reads "Hidden Gems! 19 books by Canadian authors you may never have heard of (but will totally wonder how your bookshelves lived without!) It also provides the date of the promo: March 1st to 15th, only on Itchi.io. The books involved are as follows: The Lion The Erstwhile Tyler Kyle The Dragon Next Door River of Crows Hope is the Thing with Feathers The Clockwork Empire Flesh and Bone Goblin Girl Moonshadow's Guardian Your Blood and Bones Winner Takes All The Flaws of Gravity Scrap Metal Angel Destined to be Normal Clipped Bloody Spade Baker Thief Path of the Warrior Prince Ewald the Brave

Do you like discovering new authors? Do you live for the thrill of finding a new favourite book? And do you LOVE to support Canadian creators? Then this is the book sale for you! 🍁🦫 #reading #books #CanLit #BuyCanadian

➡️ itch.io/b/3524/hidde...

02.03.2026 16:15 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
In the Pursuit of Privet So many things can come to light simply by looking at something completely ‘ordinary’ and wanting to learn more; wanting to see connections and convergences. There is a privet hedge in my backyard as well as a seriously overgrown privet bush. This smudge of greenery prompted me to explore the etymology of the word ‘privet’, the history of the plant in North America and Europe, any traditions associated with it, and what causes it to smell so heavenly (to me but not to others) in spring. Then I stumbled upon an intrepid and largely unknown lady named Elizabeth Blackwell. What I learned was fascinating. ### The Word Privet ‘Privet’ is one of those relatively rare words that does not have a clear origin or a confirmed etymology. In English, the word appeared out of nowhere around 1540. Prior to that time, botanists referred to the plant by its Latin name ‘ _ligustrum’_ (from ‘ _ligare_ ’ meaning to tie or bind). ### First Trip into the Weeds of Digression That the word appeared with no history whatsoever brought to mind the story of Zeus and the Titaness Metis. Metis, the first wife of Zeus, was pregnant with his child. Because he was warned that one of her sons might be more powerful than him, he decided to eat his pregnant wife. The child was Athena, not a son after all. Anyway, after his cannibalistic dinner, Zeus developed a headache. Not having invented aspirin, Zeus asked a fellow Olympian, Hephaestus, to split his skull with an axe. Athena, the goddess of wisdom, popped out of Zeus’s forehead. It’s a long story. In any case, it would seem that ‘privet’ just popped out of someone’s head and began travelling through the English lexicon. ### Returning to the Word Privet Some sources believe it may have originated from the word ‘ _prime_ ’, but that seems a rather esoteric path for such a common plant. I wonder why no one seems to make an association with ‘ _private_ ’, given that privet is used for hedges and privacy, but I’m no etymologist. In most European languages, the word for privet is based upon the aforementioned Latin term. However, in some Gaelic entries it is referred to as _prìomhat_. In Scots Gaelic, we find _ras-chrann sìor-uaine_ (meaning branch tree or shrub), or _Sìor-uaine_ (meaning ‘evergreen’). Irish Gaelic calls it _privéad_ or _ras-chrann_. ### Second Trip into the Weeds of Digression To further digress, the commonplace word in Russian for ‘hello’ or ‘hi’ is приве́т (privét). I rather like the idea of my bushes saying hello in Russian. ### What is that Fragrance, or Would Shakespeare’s Privet Smell as Sweet by any other Name? Chemists, perfumers, botanists, and other scientists who concern themselves with the chemical properties of plants have isolated, in great detail, the components that create the heady perfume emanating from privet when it blooms in spring. For me, that perfume is strong, sweet, pervasive, and utterly enchanting. The bees are drawn to the bushes and continuously sip their nectar. For others, it stinks. But why? Here are some of the chemical components of privet: phenylacetaldehyde, veratrole, linalool, hotrienol, methyl o-anisate, phloroglucinol trimethyl ether, phenylbutanones, and others. There are many more, but in order to answer the question of why some people find the scent of privet so objectionable, I went hunting for other plants which have a similar chemical composition. Lo and behold, I found that coriander (also known as cilantro) and privet share several chemical compounds, primarily aldehydes, which are responsible for their shared ‘soapy’ or ‘green’ aroma profiles depending on how you sense it. If people dislike cilantro, they probably equally dislike privet, and this may be because of their DNA profile. Without getting too far into the weeds (pardon the pun), if a person has a variation in the OR6A2 gene, that individual will be particularly sensitive to the odour of aldehydes. Actually, let’s quickly get into the weeds: _(E)-2-Decenal_ is the primary constituent of the aroma of cilantro and of privet leaves. _Decanal (Aldehyde C-10)_ is found in both plants as is dodecanal. Perfumers cite _(E)-2-Dodecenal_ in databases where a ‘green wavy cilantro soapy privet’ is sought (which is remarkably specific!). ### Who Cares? I don't know if I’ve stumbled upon the answer to a question that likely no one cares about, but hey, I think I’ve figured something out. You’re welcome. ### Folklore and Legends Privet wasn't really a popular plant in North America until after the 1850s, so there isn't much recorded on this side of the Atlantic. There is however considerable lore in Europe and Asia. In fact, privet was considered a symbol of protection and purity, which was planted around sacred spaces and homes to protect against evil spirits. The plant is hardy and evergreen, lending itself to notions of endurance and resilience. In Feng Shui, it’s a guardian of positive energy and is thought to repel negativity (something like a green force field) and enhance balance and prosperity. It creates a harmonious flow of chi (life force). Not too shabby for a common hedge. And let’s not forget Anacreon, the Greek poet (573-495BCE): > [He] ornamentally wreathed his seven-stringed lyre with privet while he chanted his erotic verses. On the other hand, particularly in Lancashire, the privet is not considered lucky at all. In fact, should someone bring privet flowers into the home they are inviting bad luck or a fire. ### Privet as Medicine Please don't take this information as advice. I am only reporting what has been said or written regarding the medicinal uses of privet. Privet berries are certainly toxic to people and animals, but other parts of the plant are believed to have curative properties. The Roman naturalist Pliny the Elder wrote that: > Its leaves everywhere are used to treat ulcers, and with a sprinkling of salt, sores in the mouth. A British botanist and herbalist, John Gerard (1545-1612) noted that: > The leaves of privet do cure the swellings of the mouth or throat being gargarified with the juyce or decoction thereof. The Shakers in North America sold privet leaves as an anti-scurvy treatment and astringent mouthwash. Personally I never tried it. Current science does vindicate these beliefs to some extent. Some species of privet have antimicrobial properties that can interfere with Staphylococcus aureus, the cause of a staph infection. ### Elizabeth Blackwell: The Curious History of a Curious Herbalist Elizabeth Blackwell — Villain (1737). Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons. At the head of this essay, I used a lovely illustration created by Elizabeth Blackwell. Some catalogues pertaining to botany list the illustration of privet (or ‘prim plant’, a whimsical name I rather like, despite it being the usual secondary name of a primrose) as being created by 'Elizabeth Blackwell, Scottish'. However, Elizabeth was not Scottish. When I queried an AI system about who first illustrated privet (restricting the search to Europeans and North Americans only), Elizabeth was not even listed. A further query specific to women illustrators or artists also gave no results. When asking AI about Elizabeth specifically, the system stated with confidence that Elizabeth was Scottish. She was not. That was her husband. Once again,**** AI was wrong, but let’s move on and tell a little about Elizabeth’s remarkable story. Elizabeth Simpson was born in London in spring 1699. A daughter of a painter, she had been well-educated in art, music, and languages, and her father likely had a reasonable dowry ready for her future husband. On the other hand, some researchers believe she was born in Scotland to a family named Blachrie, but I doubt that this is accurate. My research found there were two Alexander Blackwells and two Elizabeth Blackwells, and I believe they were conflated. In any case, Elizabeth married a man by the name of Alexander Blackwell (b. ca. 1700) — he was the Scot; probably not her. They married in 1733, around the time he was studying at Marischal College. It seems that some rather scandalous business swirled around Alexander — something to the effect that he was about to be charged for illegally practising medicine — so he and Elizabeth fled to London. Or he fled to London and met her there (which seems more likely given the records available). In London, Elizabeth studied midwifery, but did not pursue it due to what she found was ‘ _the ignorance and low character of the women who at that time followed the same calling’_. Wikipedia defines Alexander as an ‘ _adventurer’_ , a rather generous moniker. In 1730, while in London he set up his own printing house despite not belonging to a guild or having completed a required apprenticeship. He was charged with violation of trade rules and was heavily fined. Meanwhile, he had been ‘living large’, as we would say today, perhaps enjoying the generous dowry of his wife. He got himself into serious debt and ended up in Highgate Prison for two years. By July 1734, Elizabeth appears in the London Poor Registers and is undertaking some form of apprenticeship. By this time, Elizabeth had two children (William and Ann, both of whom later died in 1736, and a daughter named Elizabeth, who had been born in 1734 but likely died in infancy) to care for, a house to maintain, and no income. Clearly determined not to slide further into despair and debt, she learned that illustrated herbals were in demand to inform the English of new and ‘exotic’ plants from the Americas and the Far East. She could draw and paint, and so decided to create a herbal. Not knowing all the scientific nomenclature and lacking an in-depth medical background, she created the drawings and would take them to her husband’s jail cell to have him provide the correct names in Latin, Greek, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, and German. Elizabeth had not studied botany, but this did not deter her. She moved her household to be closer to the Chelsea Physick Garden where many of the plants she wished to illustrate were grown. This afforded her the opportunity to draw from life. She created over 500 drawings, wrote the text and hand-coloured the printed illustrations. Her next hurdle was dealing with the engravings. At the time, most illustrated volumes of this type would be sent to a professional engraver to create the plates. Blackwell was either thrifty by nature or necessity, and decided to learn how to engrave by herself. The cover of __'A Curious Herbal', a__ manuscript by Elizabeth Blackwell. Her opus was dauntingly large, as was the title. She called it '_A Curious Herbal, containing five hundred cuts of the most useful plants which are now used in the Practise of Physick, to which is added a short description of ye plants and their common uses in Physick_ ’. Probably to eat the elephant one bite at a time, she came up with an ingenious solution: to serialize the work. Most people give credit to Charles Dickens, Washington Irving and other (male) authors for having come up with the concept of serialization, but Elizabeth was well ahead of them. She issued her work in weekly parts, each with four plates and accompanying text. The process began in 1737 and continued over 125 weeks, into 1739. Blackwell also did her own marketing, touting the work through word of mouth and through various trade journals. The task, daunting as it was, was also plagued with other troubles. In one instance, another group of printers and publishers (who Alexander later sued) produced a 'spurious and base' copy of her illustrations elsewhere. The first printing of _A Curious Herbal_ met with some success; several physicians and apothecaries expressed their appreciation of the calibre of her work — and of the illustrations in particular. These recommendations influenced her receiving the endorsement of the Royal College of Physicians — no small honour. ### Not Just Tammy Wynette singing ‘Stand by your Man’ [1] The book was a financial success, and Elizabeth used the funds to get her husband out of debtors' prison. But once a spender, always a spender: Alexander got into debt again and the couple had to sell half the rights of her book to a London bookseller. This was insufficient to keep the wolf from the door. In 1747, Elizabeth had to sell the remaining rights, along with all remaining copies of the book, including the copper plates that could be used to produce subsequent volumes. Meanwhile, Alexander had tried his hand at other enterprises, none of which were successful. To avoid his creditors and other unpleasantness, he abandoned Elizabeth and trundled off to Sweden in 1742. Improbably — and who knows how — he managed to secure himself the position of Court Physician to King Frederick I. His future ought to have been assured with such a position, but no. While in Sweden he became embroiled in a sordid conspiracy against the Swedish Crown, involving himself in matters of succession. Elizabeth was on her way to Sweden when he was executed for treason on August 9, 1747. __'Frederick I of Sweden'__ (ca. 1730) by Martin van Meytens, Public domain Prior to his execution, Elizabeth had been dutifully sending money to him in Sweden. She died, alone and impoverished, in October 1758. The august _The Dictionary of National Biography_ , after asserting that Elizabeth was the daughter of a stocking merchant (untrue — her father was an artist) and had eloped with Alexander (perhaps, as documentation provides their location of marriage as an Inn in London), ends the entry on Elizabeth with these words: > Having performed her task of delivering her husband and temporarily re-establishing his affairs, Elizabeth Blackwell disappears from observation. How sad that she is summarized as ‘ _having performed her task_ ’. How sad that she is largely forgotten despite others (men) who did less are hailed more. So ends my journey of discovery, prompted by some privet in my backyard. * * * [1] Here are Wynette's dreadful lyrics: > Sometimes it's hard to be a woman > Giving all your love to just one man > You'll have bad times, and he'll have good times > Doin' things that you don't understand > But if you love him, you'll forgive him > Even though he's hard to understand > And if you love him, oh, be proud of him > 'Cause after all, he's just a man > Stand by your man > Give him two arms to cling to > And something warm to come to > When nights are cold and lonely > Stand by your man > And show the world you love him > Keep giving all the love you can > Stand by your man Wynette had five husbands, so perhaps the title should have been ‘ _Stand by your**Men’**._ * * * Would you like to read other posts? If so, please click the Home Page link below: Louche LeavesAn Irregular Journal of Thoughts, Stories, Ideas and RecollectionsLouche Leaves

Russians saying hello in my backyard, the curious link between cilantro haters and privet, and the intrepid Elizabeth Blackwell.

02.03.2026 14:00 👍 1 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Family Feud: Not Family Fare My nine-year-old granddaughter was here watching television one afternoon after school. The channel was showing “Family Feud”, a show which I thought was largely innocuous. Certainly vacuous, pandering to the simple-minded and unimaginative, but not violent or otherwise seriously objectionable. I thought it would be OK to let her watch. But I was wrong. I cannot find the episode online, but I can assure you that this question was asked during a recent broadcast of the “ _fast money_ ” final round. The question was (to the best of my recollection): > At what age does a woman become a cougar? The contestant (a male) responded “40”. Then, the second contestant (also a male) when asked the same question also responded “40”. The buzzer went off, indicating that the answer had already been given and that he needed to choose another age. He posited “45”. The top answer was “40”. The rest of the family (young women and the wife), clapped, jumped, cheered — giddy with happiness at the brilliance of their male relatives. My granddaughter asked “ _what’s a cougar?_ ” She thought it referred to the animal. I didn’t know how to answer this, said something inane as “ _I have no idea what they mean_ ”, and changed the channel. So boys and especially girls, what have we learned today? We learned that according to a survey of 100 men, a woman seeking companionship, perhaps with a younger man, becomes an object of scorn and derision at age 40. ### O Canada, For Shame There isn’t much confirmed detail on when the term “ _cougar_ ” entered the lexicon as a synonym for an older woman seeking a younger male partner. What seems to be the consensus is that it first appeared in print on the Canadian website “ _cougardate.com_ ” in 1999. The site is still active and encourages men to “ _chat with cougars on the prowl”_. ### Nothing New about the Usual Double Standard Women having relationships with younger men is hardly something new (think Cleopatra, Queen Elizabeth I), but it has always been considered — and continues to be — transgressive. There are some negative feelings towards men who date younger women, but they seem confined to much older men seeking a partner with a much greater age disparity, or men of any vintage dating teenagers. Otherwise, apparently, it isn’t a big deal. But a 40-year-old woman‽ Apparently shameful and pathetic. How does one respond to the question posed by a nine-year-old girl? ### The Older Woman as an Object of Scorn Consider Mrs. Robinson in The Graduate. I wrote a review of the novel (and indirectly of the film) here: Review: The GraduateCan you like a book yet hate the protagonist and everything he stands (or in this case, slouches) for?Louche LeavesDenise Choppin It’s darkly fascinating, deeply telling and profoundly horrifying to see how so many readers and viewers idolize the protagonist, Ben and despise the older Mrs. Robinson. Ben, despite entering into an adulterous relationship is sanctified and pitied, while Mrs. Robinson is assigned the role of a whore. She is especially vilified when she (understandably) asked Ben not to date her daughter. Even the lyrics of the Simon and Garfunkel eponymous song emphasize this > Every way you look at this, you lose ### A Whiff of Patriarchy I then began to look into some history of the “Family Feud” programme and found ample examples of sexist and misogynist tropes. The following episode from November 3, 2021 is one of the most egregious, but sufficiently oh-so-subtle that it almost passes the patriarchy-stink-test. Early in the episode, the question posed was: > Personally, I think I have a hot looking what? The father of a young daughter guessed (correctly as it would turn out) “ _kid_ ”. Ugh. It reminded me of the interview of the orange thing commenting on this daughter Ivanka. But I digress. Later in the show, the question was > A woman would have a hard time standing by her man if he were to do what? The same family provided the answer "_cheat_ ". But — and here is the completely ugly part — the writers, evidently going for the cheap shot, provided the following definition: > Cheat/Get Ho Preggo Screen Capture of Family Feud Top Answer "Cheat/Get Ho Preggo" Once again, misogyny wrapped in a punchline. The lesson, apparently, is that if a woman becomes pregnant with a man in who is in another relationship, she must be a whore. Family Feud may be labelled as “family” entertainment, but if you are a young girl … beware. * * * Would you like to read other posts? If so, please click the Home Page link below: Louche LeavesAn Irregular Journal of Thoughts, Stories, Ideas and RecollectionsLouche Leaves

Misogyny Wrapped in a Punchline

25.02.2026 14:00 👍 1 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
The Shady History of Our Family Tree: Our Norway Maple I believe you may find connections to an extraordinary amount of history simply by stepping into your yard and looking anew at what is there. Our yard contained three Norway Maples; now only two remain. The original “mother tree”, a female — we know this because she produced “helicopter” seeds every year — is no longer alive. Her two offspring, a male and a female, are still growing, and are both seemingly hardy. The mother maple had been planted here sometime around 1956, when the house was built, and was likely a tiny seedling in the 1940s. She grew to a towering height of roughly 70 ft (ca. 21 m), and near the ground her circumference was around 6–7 ft (1.83–2.13 m). She was presiding over the backyard when I moved here in 1961, and was a source of shade and play for years. We made daisy chains of her leaves; tossed her helicopter seeds into the air; used her fallen branches to build forts; made watercolour “paint” from her bark; and laid beneath her canopy in the summer, staring up into the deep green. Over decades, she was home to numerous families of squirrels and once (that I know of) to a family of raccoons. Although her progeny may have been legion, just two remain here in my yard. ### An Immigrant to the New World Her family was an immigrant one, as Norway Maples are not native to North America. Originally from Northern Europe and Asia, in her native land a Norway Maple can live up to 250 years, and grow staggeringly tall. Here in North America, my tree was as large, and as old, as can be reached by an immigrant Norway Maple. Botanical historians have documented that the first person to import seeds of the Norway Maple was the botanist John Bartram of Philadelphia. Bartram was born in the late spring of 1699 to a prominent Quaker family. His mother died in 1701, and he was sent to be raised by his maternal grandfather. Then, in 1711, his father William was killed by natives in the Tuscarora War, and his stepmother and step-siblings were captured and held for ransom. Once redeemed by relatives, his step-family had him join them in Philadelphia. In describing his youth, Bartram wrote _“all my younger years being subject to grip, grievous coughs, heartburn, acrimonious looseness, dizziness, and rheumatism_ ”. He was afflicted with a _“slavish fear of lightening”_ , which leads one to wonder how skittish he might have been in the outdoors as a botanist and explorer. Bartram, perhaps understandably given his family’s tragedy, had a poor opinion of Native Americans, and once wrote that the best way to deal with them was to _“bang them stoutly”_. He was also an enslaver, buying and selling human beings throughout his lifetime and helping his son to do the same. He expressed concern that his slaves might _“run away or murther”_ them, and was decidedly against the notion of educating enslaved individuals. Bartram did, however, speak well of one man (possibly a free-black named Harvey) who handled his business in Philadelphia “ _with a punctuality, from which he has never deviated”_. As a Quaker, his belief in slavery may have put him at odds with his congregation, and might have contributed to his being expelled from the Society of Friends in 1758. As a Norway Maple, which spreads its seeds abundantly — so much so that it is considered a “noxious weed” — Bartram had two children with his first wife, and then another five in a second marriage. But enough on his personal life. Bartram was well-known for his Norway Maple seeds —none other than George Washington ordered some from him in 1792. Illustration of John Bartram by Howard Pyle (1853–1911). Public Domain. In any case, it was Bartram who first imported the seeds of the Norway Maple from England in 1756. He got them from Philip Miller (1691-1771), an English botanist and gardener. Philip Miller, Botanist — Bookplate in Public Domain There isn't much information, if any, on where Miller sourced his Norway Maple seeds, but every one likely originated from somewhere in Northern Europe. However, there are a few documented sources that mention the tree in England as early as 1683. It isn't likely that my tree descends from either Bartram or from George Washington, but she would have had a common ancestry going back further in her family tree, such as a second cousin twice removed. Is my calling my tree a “she” and referring to her family history a little over the top? To answer that question, I am reminded of a quote from the poet and essayist Mary Oliver: > I began to appreciate … that the great black oaks knew me. I don’t mean that they knew me as myself and not another – that kind of individualism was not in the air – but that they recognised and responded to my presence and to my mood. They began to offer, or I began to feel them offer, their serene greeting. As with Tolkein’s Ents, I somehow imagine that trees are sentient, maneuver imperceptibly, and dream slow, thick dreams. Unfortunately, we do not understand them, and can only react to them. One such reaction is nicely expressed by the Japanese word “k _omorebi”_ , a noun referring to the sunlight that filters through the leaves of trees. My maple’s komorebi was dark and sparse, as her leaves were thick and numerous. My maple was a silent tree. Some are noisy: aspens tremble, as do poplars, and birches make a flickering sound. The maple is more dignified; its leaves move languidly in the wind, hardly making any sound at all. C.G. Jung spoke of trees (and more) in this profoundly melancholic quote: > Man feels himself isolated in the cosmos. He is no longer involved in nature and has lost his emotional participation in natural events, which hitherto had a symbolic meaning for him. Thunder is no longer the voice of a god, nor is lightening his avenging missile. No river contains a spirit, no tree means a man’s life, no snake is the embodiment of wisdom and no mountain still harbours a great demon. Neither do things speak to him nor can he speak to things, like stones, springs, plants, and animals. ### Folklore of the Norway Maple The Norway Maple has little or no spiritual significance to First Nations people here in North America, which makes sense given that these trees arrived after the mid 1700s, and only spread significantly in the middle of the 20th century (when my tree was born). However, in Northern Europe there are traditions associated with it. In Germanic and Central European folklore, the Norway Maple is associated with strength, protection, and the spirit world. With a lifespan of up to 250 years (in Europe, not in North America), it was considered a long-time witness to events. Its branches were placed over doors and windows, those liminal spaces and thresholds, to protect against the passage of evil. She was considered to be the über-mother of the forest. Her bark and leaves were made into teas said to strengthen the liver. Her leaves, reminiscent of the shape of hands, signified good luck and abundance being given to others. ### The Death of The Mother Tree After more than six decades presiding over my backyard, passing nourishment through her roots to her progeny; of standing resolute through subzero winters and blisteringly hot summers; suffering and recovering from fungal tar spots in her leaves; in her old age she was beset with calamities. First, it was a terrible late spring storm, when a microburst hit her from above, followed by a terrific bolt of lightning. She had two main trunks, but one of them was sheared off, falling down with a thunderous crash. She lost about half of her body in that event. From there, weakened, she had lost her ability to withstand strong winds. She was struck by lightning several more times. Heavy snow accumulated in her canopy, causing large branches to crack and fall. Ants and fungi began to make their way under her bark skin, further weakening her. The neighbours built a starter-castle on the large lot behind our home and flooded the yard with stadium-level security lighting, interrupting what we now know is much needed darkness. Yet occasionally, the wind still breathed through her, as a slow wave breaking on a silent shore. Finally, she was a danger to her daughter tree (who had grown somewhat stunted in her immense shadow) and a hazard to our home. With profound regret and a heavy sensation of guilt, we had her cut down. But not to the ground. What remains, other than her massive root system, is a tall stump, about 10-12 ft. (ca. 3 – 3.66 m) high — a standing monument to what gardeners now call a noxious weed, but what I think of as a witness, and fellow earthling. * * * Would you like to read other posts? If so, please click the Home Page link below: Louche LeavesAn Irregular Journal of Thoughts, Stories, Ideas and RecollectionsLouche Leaves

Connecting George Washington, Jung, Micro-bursts, Fungal Tar Spots, Slavery, and Germanic Folklore

18.02.2026 14:00 👍 1 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

This and why didn't the CONS wouldn't allow press coverage at their leadership convention.

They just don't get it.

01.02.2026 00:48 👍 7 🔁 3 💬 1 📌 0
Saturday Night In The City Of The Dead
Saturday Night In The City Of The Dead YouTube video by Ultravox - Topic
05.02.2026 02:40 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
9 Toronto police officers facing charges related to tow-truck violence: source | CBC News Nine Toronto police officers are facing charges related to violent incidents involving tow trucks and operators across the Greater Toronto Area, multiple sources tell CBC News.

"Officers are accused of trafficking, leaking addresses to hitmen, and leaking police officer addresses, the sources said.

The investigation also uncovered a conspiracy to kill a unit commander at the Toronto South Detention Centre, the sources said."

Holy Christ. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...

04.02.2026 23:46 👍 279 🔁 145 💬 15 📌 46

Thirty. THIRTY.

05.02.2026 02:25 👍 13 🔁 7 💬 2 📌 0
Preview
Spotlighting The World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell Somewhat devastating news today from the CIA: One of CIA’s oldest and most recognizable intelligence publications, The World Factbook, has sunset. There's not even a hint as to why they …

«The CIA just stopped publishing their World Factbook and took every page, including the archived copies of previous versions This sucks. It was public domain, so I recovered the 2020 edition (the last one published as a zip file) and shared it to GitHub»
— Simon Willison simon@simonwillison.net

05.02.2026 00:48 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
The Coherence Premium I don't necessarily believe in second brains. The notion (pun-intended) that you can offload your thinking to a perfectly organized system of notes and links has always struck me as a fantasy. The peo...

«In 1937, the British economist Ronald Coase asked a question that seems almost embarrassingly simple: why do firms exist at all? … We're in a Coasean inversion. The solopreneur's advantage is not solely speed, and it's certainly not "lower costs"…. [It's] coherence»

03.02.2026 18:31 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
The Sovereign Individual: Radical Bible of Tech's 'Cognitive Elite' How a 1997 Book Predicted Tech’s War on Democracy

Many of the tech figures central to our current troubles consider "The Sovereign Individual" a work of prophecy—a prophecy they plan to fulfill.

It inspired Thiel to start PayPal. Here are my brief notes on the book: www.thenerdreich.com/the-sovereig...

03.02.2026 01:20 👍 86 🔁 37 💬 5 📌 1

In his defense, probably more than *some* humans. Like Yuval.

03.02.2026 01:31 👍 62 🔁 9 💬 5 📌 0
Preview
Feds Identify “Leader of Antifa” The list they're creating says so, anyway

The Department of Homeland Security thinks this 29-year-old named Chandler is "the leader of Antifa" (seriously)
www.kenklippenstein.com/p/feds-ident...

03.02.2026 01:34 👍 633 🔁 129 💬 71 📌 41
Preview
Trump's trade war took a toll on shipments in the Twin Ports last year Cargo shipments at the Port of Duluth-Superior slumped last year due to headwinds driven by unfavorable market trends, shifting trade lanes and President Donald Trump’s trade war.

«Canadian trade dropped 41 percent across all cargoes, and overseas trade fell 30 percent to its lowest level since the St. Lawrence Seaway opened in 1959. The amount of grain moving through the port also dropped to roughly 560,000 tons, the lowest level seen since 1890.»
www.wpr.org/news/trumps-...

03.02.2026 03:07 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
The only remaining US-Russia nuclear treaty expires this week. Could a new arms race soon accelerate? The demise of the treaty will bring a definitive and alarming end to nuclear restraint between the two nuclear powers.

«The New START treaty now looks set to expire without any agreement to continue to observe its limits until a successor treaty is negotiated. … No new negotiations for disarmament or even reducing nuclear risks are currently under way. None are scheduled to begin.»

03.02.2026 03:00 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
RageCheck - Detect Outrage Bait Patterns Analyze articles and social posts for manipulative language patterns, fear-mongering, and engagement bait.

«Is that post designed to make you angry? Paste any article or social post. See the persuasive techniques—explained clearly.»

www.ragecheck.com

03.02.2026 02:55 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Daydreamers and Sleepwalkers: Crossing the Borderlands of the Unconscious Scientists and philosophers have spent centuries studying sleep. Each descent only deepens the mystery.

«Not long after being elected president of the French Republic, in February 1920, Paul Deschanel found himself wandering at night along the railway line near the town of Montargis, 70 or so miles south of Paris.»

thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/daydreamers-...

03.02.2026 02:55 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
ICE's Use of AI Will Lead to Big Mistakes. Maybe That's the Point Cybersecurity experts say that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement seems to be indifferent to how their artificial intelligence tools work.

«“I think that pointing out that AI is prone to giving ICE bad information is missing the entire point of ICE. … They don’t care if the information they have is good.”»

www.rollingstone.com/culture/cult...

03.02.2026 02:53 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Complaining, Capitulation, and Compliance <p>On the surface, my visit to the local bank was merely annoying, perhaps unremarkably so. Yet the episode bothered me beyond what would seem reasonable, and I decided to sit down and quietly ponder what exactly happened and why it irked me so.</p><h3 id="setting-the-scene">Setting the Scene</h3><p>I had gone to the bank to deposit a US dollar cheque, asking that it be converted to Canadian funds and deposited into my chequing account.</p><p>Standing in line, I see with a certain amount of low-level dread that, given the speed of the lineup, I will likely be called over by a teller whom I’ve often dealt with in the past. Let’s call him Gary.</p><p>Gary is an overweight middle-aged man with sausage-like fingers that work the keyboard very, very, VERY slowly. He has been employed as a teller for years. Never transferred, never promoted, and this is unusual as most tellers seem to be entry level clerks, usually moving on within the banking operation. Gary always occupies the only spot where the teller can be seated in a low chair (all the others are seated in higher chairs, putting them at face level with the customer). Gary is seated, and his customers are placed in a lower armchair in front of him. From his higher vantage point, he then engages in his own peculiar brand of small talk with the clients.</p><p>While waiting in line, I’ve listened to Gary’s particular brand of chit-chat. What I’ve noticed is a distinct difference in tone and content when engaging with men, as opposed to women. There are other more subtle subsets of differences when he interacts with older versus younger women, but he seems to be consistent with male clients. With the men, aside from the mandatory ‘how are you today’ or ‘is there anything else I can do for you’, he sticks strictly to business.</p><p>His demeanour is different with women. He seems to have a compulsion to make himself seem more important and more competent than he actually is. Additionally, he is condescending and dismissive.</p><p>The first time I had the misfortune to be placed in front of him with a US dollar transaction, I asked (as politely as I know how) whether he knew how to process this type of transaction. I asked because many of the tellers do not. Blankly offended, he answered “of course I do”, and then proceeded to muddle about, doing it wrong, calling over a more senior associate to rectify the problem. What should have been a two-minute transaction ended up taking twenty minutes — all because Gary would not admit to his lack of knowledge. He lied.</p><p>Is that harsh? No, it’s not. I asked a straightforward question and his answer was untruthful.</p><p>The universe has sent me to Gary many times. It seems my place in line always ends up at his wicket. And everything always takes twice as long. So I gird myself, admonishing myself to be kind and patient. Feminine virtue, perhaps.</p><h3 id="complaining">Complaining</h3><p>Today was a simple transaction. Take a US dollar cheque, convert it to Canadian dollars and deposit into my account. Nothing he — nor I — haven’t done many times since that initial episode.</p><p>Yet he quizzed me several times (something I notice he does to women and never to men): Was I sure? Did I really want to convert it to Canadian? Was I certain which account I wanted to use? (I showed him for the third time the number of my account written on the back of the cheque to avoid any misunderstanding) He then pecked laboriously at the keyboard, and out of nowhere announced:</p><blockquote>I am giving you the best rate possible.</blockquote><p>Now I’m irked.</p><p>Gary has no authority to change the rates the banks provide on the exchange of foreign currency. They have a rate for anything under $5,000, then another rate for $10,000 and then one for $20,000 and so on. These are not negotiable at the teller level. To get a better rate for sums north of $10,000 you have to have a bank representative contact a foreign exchange broker within the banking system. That broker will then quote a one-time exchange rate which the client can either accept or decline.</p><p>My cheque was not in that financial range. Gary had no authority to offer anything other than the standard rate at the teller level. And he didn’t — which is fine.</p><p>But because I was irked, I decided to ask what criteria he used to confer a better exchange and what would it have been without his intercession. He replied that he just decided to give me a better rate. Not content to let this go, I asked if all the tellers have latitude to decide which exchange rates customers are given. Sticking to his story, Gary said that he just went ahead and gave me a better rate, and then ducking his head down, he went back to sluggishly typing numbers into his computer terminal. The conversation was over.</p><p>Liar, liar, pants on fire.</p><h3 id="capitulation-and-compliance">Capitulation and Compliance</h3><p>A wise person (either John Kozol or David Allen — alas, no one seems to know for certain) once famously said:</p><blockquote>Pick battles big enough to matter, small enough to win.</blockquote><p>Sun Tzu, in the Art of War, said:</p><blockquote>Every battle is won before it is fought.</blockquote><p>In my case, I was enacting the reverse of Sun Tzu, being doomed to lose the battle. My opponent didn’t engage, was either indifferent or intentionally obtuse and had the superior power of having something I needed, while I had nothing of meaning for him.</p><p>Anyway, clearly this was a small battle, more of a skirmish, really. Was it important? To me, being a somewhat testy pedant, perhaps.</p><p>To wrap up the bank transaction, my cheque was deposited with no further uncomfortable queries from me and, like Elvis, I left the building.</p><p>On a side note, I wonder if Gary feels the same dread when he sees me standing in line. Maybe; but somehow, I don’t think so. Perhaps Gary will go home later and lament to his spouse “you wouldn’t believe what this old woman said today!” Or, more likely, he didn’t even notice, especially since I am part of an invisible demographic (crone-age white woman).</p><h3 id="seeking-an-answer-to-a-question-i-didn%E2%80%99t-realize-i-was-asking">Seeking An Answer to a Question I Didn’t Realize I was Asking</h3><p>Did I really need to know the inner workings of the bank? Of course not. Certainly not in this tiny circumstance.</p><p>But what was actually happening here? Why is it acceptable for Gary to tell me this <em>stupid</em> falsehood? What purpose did it serve? Did it make him feel important or superior in some way? Or are little lies and falsehoods so ingrained in his persona that he cannot resist telling them? Was his performance practice for even bigger lies? Why does he preen for women, but not for men? (Remember, I’ve listened to him over the last few years).</p><p>The question that I believe has been lurking at the back of my mind is how frequently people make up little lies that apparently serve no purpose other than self-aggrandizement? Why? How often does this happen and we, collectively, merely assume that the person is telling us the truth? Or do we simply become exhausted or lazy about the process of questioning what is presented as real?</p><p>The process seems to be:</p><ul><li>We complain</li><li>We capitulate</li><li>We comply</li></ul><p>Then we gingerly goosestep towards our future.</p><hr /><p>Would you like to read other posts? If so, please click the Home Page link below:</p><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://loucheleaves.com/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Louche Leaves</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">An Irregular Journal of Thoughts, Stories, Ideas and Recollections</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://loucheleaves.com/favicon.ico" alt="" /><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Louche Leaves</span></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://loucheleaves.com/content/images/2024/04/Luminoth-rapie_-_Monch-1.jpg" alt="" /></div></a></figure>

Gingerly Goosestepping Through Life

02.02.2026 14:00 👍 1 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0

Mal J Brown 🌐

My friend Denise does genealogical research and writes about historical figures. If you have someone in your family tree that you wish to memorialize with a brief biography, give her a shout!

31.01.2026 01:43 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Tomato Tariff Taxonomy <p>Tariffs in the United States are nothing new. Nor is the ease in which the Supreme Court panders to whomever is in power.</p><p>Take the bizarre case of Nix v Heddon, which involved the legal status of the tomato.</p><p>In 1883, the government of the United States passed the Tariff Act which tripled the tax on imported vegetables but not on fruits. Fruits were completely exempt.</p><p>At that time, John Nix &amp; Co. was the largest seller of produce in New York City and was a major importer of both fruits and vegetables. He had paid a substantial amount of tariff fees to the government, even though the tomato is, botanically, a fruit.</p><p>Eats, Shoots, and Leaves — or Eats Shoots and Leaves?</p><p>Even my nine-year-old granddaughter knows that a tomato is a fruit. The science is and has been clear on the matter for more than 100 years. A fruit is defined as the seed-bearing structure of a plant which develops from the ovary of a flower. A vegetable is any part of a plant that we eat, which can include flowers, stems, leaves, roots, seeds, and fruits themselves. “<em>Fruit</em>” is a botanical term, whereas “<em>vegetable</em>” is a culinary term.</p><p>Based on science and botany, green beans, pumpkins, cucumbers, eggplant and several other edibles we commonly term vegetables, are actually fruits.</p><p>As the humorist writer Miles Kingston remarked:</p><blockquote>Knowledge consists of knowing that tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad.</blockquote><p>But what if you ask a lawyer?</p><p>If a lawyer becomes involved, it becomes a trick (<em>and billable</em>) question. Which brings to mind the 1937 Gershwin song “<em>Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off</em>” (later performed by Ella Fitzgerald, among others), where the lyrics say “<em>You like to-may-to, and I like to-mah-to</em>”… but I digress.</p><p>The “trickiness” of the question from a lawyer’s point of view brings us back to John Nix who filed suit against Edward L. Hedden, Collector of the Port of New York. His argument challenged the tariff status of the tomato.</p><p>Eventually the case worked its way up to the Supreme Court. Nix’s attorneys cited three dictionaries and called in witnesses who had been selling fruits and vegetables for over thirty years.</p><p>But their testimony didn’t matter.</p><p>Despite scientific definitions, Justice Horace Gray opined that the words have no special meaning in trade or commerce, and so the court must use common parlance — therefore the tomato is a vegetable.</p><p>Here are Gray’s words:</p><blockquote>Botanically speaking, tomatoes are the fruit of a vine, just as are cucumbers, squashes, beans, and peas. But in the common language of the people, whether sellers or consumers of provisions, all these are vegetables which are grown in kitchen gardens, and which, whether eaten cooked or raw, are, like potatoes, carrots, parsnips, turnips, beets, cauliflower, cabbage, celery, and lettuce, usually served at dinner in, with, or after the soup, fish, or meats which constitute the principal part of the repast, and not, like fruits generally, as dessert.<br /><br />[The dictionary] does not classify all things there, but they are correct as far as they go. It does not take all kinds of fruit or vegetables; it takes a portion of them. I think the words 'fruit' and 'vegetable' have the same meaning in trade today that they had on March 1, 1883. I understand that the term 'fruit' is applied in trade only to such plants or parts of plants as contain the seeds. There are more vegetables than those in the enumeration given in Webster’s Dictionary under the term 'vegetable,' as 'cabbage, cauliflower, turnips, potatoes, peas, beans, and the like,' probably covered by the words ‘and the like.’</blockquote><p>So, boys and girls, the moral of the story is that the august Supreme Court, as appointees of the government, has a long history of leaning with gratitude towards whatever entity gave them their comfy chairs.</p><p>Furthermore, the highest court in the land, way back in 1893, confirmed that science didn’t matter, but what did matter was what the majority of people believed. In other words, any fiction will do, especially when it supports raking in money.</p><p>And while we are discussing "The Truth”, here is a great clip from the Simpsons where Marge is given an explanation on the subject. Enjoy!</p><figure class="kg-card kg-embed-card kg-card-hascaption"><iframe width="200" height="150" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-Nc88_ZEfxg?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen title="Lionel Hutz explains &quot;The Truth&quot;"></iframe><figcaption><p><span style="white-space:pre-wrap">Lionel Hutz explains "The Truth" to Marge — Jim Reardon and Swinton O. Scott III, dirs. "Reality Bites". The Simpsons, Season 9, Episode 9, Dec 7, 1997.</span></p></figcaption></figure><hr /><p>Would you like to read other posts? If so, please click the Home Page link below:</p><figure class="kg-card kg-bookmark-card"><a class="kg-bookmark-container" href="https://loucheleaves.com/"><div class="kg-bookmark-content"><div class="kg-bookmark-title">Louche Leaves</div><div class="kg-bookmark-description">An Irregular Journal of Thoughts, Stories, Ideas and Recollections</div><div class="kg-bookmark-metadata"><img class="kg-bookmark-icon" src="https://loucheleaves.com/favicon.ico" alt="" /><span class="kg-bookmark-author">Louche Leaves</span></div></div><div class="kg-bookmark-thumbnail"><img src="https://loucheleaves.com/content/images/2024/04/Luminoth-rapie_-_Monch-1.jpg" alt="" /></div></a></figure>

The Supreme Court in 1893: Science vs. Common Parlance

29.01.2026 14:00 👍 1 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0