Pawel Swidlicki's Avatar

Pawel Swidlicki

@pswidlicki

Currently clean on OPSEC

3,391
Followers
1,669
Following
2,443
Posts
19.09.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Pawel Swidlicki @pswidlicki

The Trump/Rubio shoe humiliation thing actually appears to be real? Thought it was a JD Vance sofa type gag when I first saw it.

11.03.2026 18:05 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

it really is unfortunately this simple - we elected the stupidest narcissists absolutely convinced that they could just go and "assert warfighter dominance" or whatever, those pussy liberals didn't wanna FIGHT!!!, and are just now shocked that the enemy gets a vote too

11.03.2026 16:29 πŸ‘ 727 πŸ” 105 πŸ’¬ 8 πŸ“Œ 3

Jet fuel melts approval ratings

11.03.2026 16:34 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Speaking as a consumer as opposed to producer of newsletter content, there's just so much going on ATM (and so much excellent anysis) that one just tends to get a bit overloaded, not least since things are mostly pretty grim

11.03.2026 16:32 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I think the baseline is somewhat different, but there are definitely parallels

11.03.2026 14:51 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Have to say I do not find Mandelson's complete imperviousness to shame or lack of any grace beyond the superficial variety in any way astonishing, these were seen as assets as regards being able to operate effectively within Trump's orbit.

11.03.2026 14:47 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

"There you have it, in black and white. The PM, Keir Starmer, warned in the clearest possible terms that Peter Mandelson maintained his relationship [with Epstein] after the conviction.. there is no escape from this"

11.03.2026 14:11 πŸ‘ 309 πŸ” 152 πŸ’¬ 15 πŸ“Œ 24

Not a celebrity as such but got blocked by a completely random backbench Labour MP for absolutely no obvious reason (don't think I'd ever interacted with her) which became a problem when she technically won a twitter competition I was running on behalf of a client, but I hadn't seen her tweet

11.03.2026 14:04 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Wouldn't also surprise me if it also was partially a twitter effect, I skimmed it the other day early on in the conflict and there were lots of 'so much epic winning' type posts

11.03.2026 13:47 πŸ‘ 9 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Doubt much of the electorate have noticed but the mess Badenoch and Farage have got into over Iran shows just how beatable they are.

11.03.2026 13:32 πŸ‘ 484 πŸ” 106 πŸ’¬ 19 πŸ“Œ 3

Jim Cramer suggests on CNBC that Trump could β€œbomb Tehran into the Stone Age” until Iran reopens the strait, citing U.S. bombings of North Vietnam in the 1970s. Carl Quintanilla points out to him that Hanoi won that war.

11.03.2026 13:09 πŸ‘ 6598 πŸ” 1340 πŸ’¬ 246 πŸ“Œ 309

If you thought China was selling a lot of batteries and solar panels before, you’re going to love what happens next.

11.03.2026 03:02 πŸ‘ 981 πŸ” 163 πŸ’¬ 21 πŸ“Œ 13

Its like when Sunak and Hunt cut NI, something the whole Conservative media-political ecosystem had been calling for but given the wider economic backdrop it just didn't really register. That said, I'd expect lifting the 2CBC would be noticed by the people it affects.

11.03.2026 09:45 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, that bit did come through. I still let them win the war though, felt like least worst outcome.

10.03.2026 20:04 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Thing about Nigel is that like him or not at least he gives it you straight unlike all those professional LibLabCon politicians

10.03.2026 20:03 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I haven't read the books, but in the game Nilfgaard felt quite Germanic-coded

10.03.2026 20:01 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

This isn't funny with the sole exception of Yvette Cooper now being on the opposite side of this kind of HO performative vindictive pettiness

10.03.2026 19:56 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

The Blue Labour justification is that people on here won't like it

10.03.2026 19:55 πŸ‘ 59 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, there’s absolutely no way Vladimir Putin would be sending satellite reconnaissance photos to the Iranians, he certainly doesn’t benefit from elevated oil prices and US economic problems

10.03.2026 15:58 πŸ‘ 477 πŸ” 74 πŸ’¬ 8 πŸ“Œ 1

Incredible. A prime example of what happens when someone has to leave the confines of their political ecosystem (you could even call it their safe space) and have to reconstruct their worldview from first principles.

10.03.2026 15:04 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

β€œ.. Nearly seven months ago, Ukrainian officials tried to sell the U.S. their battle-proven technology for downing Iranian-made attack drones .. The Trump administration dismissed the Ukrainians ..”

@axios.com
www.axios.com/2026/03/10/u...

10.03.2026 12:25 πŸ‘ 1357 πŸ” 546 πŸ’¬ 44 πŸ“Œ 34

Corbyn, Brexit, Trump, Covid, Israel, Ukraine, trans... chose your own derangement vector

10.03.2026 12:21 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I do think its true that anti-Semitism was 'instrumentalised' by Corbyn's internal opponents within Labour, but the fact remains it had to meaningfully exist for that to even be possible

10.03.2026 12:19 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Boris Johnson's version of the Tory party but led by Farage and Jeremy Corbyn's Labour party led by Zach Polanski

10.03.2026 12:17 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I'll admit to liking her a bit back in the day even when I didn't always agree her, thought she was frequently insightful etc but yeah, her recent trajectory hasn't been good

10.03.2026 12:15 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

"President Donald Trump’s decision to wage war abroad threatens to wipe out some of his key economic accomplishments at home" >> which ones?

10.03.2026 00:44 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It's genuinely incredible how "listens to what Trump says and interprets it as a policy goal" puts you in the top 5% of Trump understanders

09.03.2026 14:56 πŸ‘ 803 πŸ” 111 πŸ’¬ 13 πŸ“Œ 5

I guess if you're a populist opposition party then you'd welcome the fact that incumbent governments are likely going to get the bulk of the blame for any economic repercussions

09.03.2026 22:28 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

One for the sovereignty fetishists

09.03.2026 22:26 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Don't really know enough about what the Departments for Wales and Scotland are doing to be able to agree 100%

07.03.2026 15:49 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0