You ever not want to go to bed bc youโre having a really good hair day?
You ever not want to go to bed bc youโre having a really good hair day?
I moved 1.5 years ago, and had ten filing boxes full of paper doom piles, which I've been carting from place to place--and adding to--for DECADES. I also have a lot of organized files that are wildly out of date. I'm FINALLY going through them and shredding, and it is sooooooo satisfying!
Why are people talking about Op Ed? What did I miss?
Iโm just gonna keep saying it hoping people hear it: โenormityโ =\= โenormousnessโ. โEnormityโ means โextreme wickedness.โ itโs appropriate applied to Jeffrey Epstein, not the Grand Canyon.
Young writers: โtown homeโ is a marketing term. The real word for that type of building is โtown house.โ A โhomeโ is any place a person lives. A โhouseโ is a building intended as a residence. This is why โhomelessnessโ is giving way to โunhoused.โ And itโs time the neologism โtownhomeโ did likewise.
The only people who are out here trying to trivialize what Epstein survivors experienced are people who are personally invested in doing so. If that doesnโt describe you, STOP IT. Let things be what they are; and CALL things what they are.
Acknowledging that difference helps people understand what really happened, rather than whipping up a frenzy of rage through faulty rhetoric. Understanding matters. Itโs time we stopped talking downโdumbing downโand started expecting nuance and critical understanding from people.
โฆ & Co. were committing, but weโre only going to talk about โpedophilia.โ Stop it. All rape and sexual abuse is bad. Thereโs no hierarchy, and no reason to get crazy about one type and not another. Words matter. Definitions matter. DISTINCTIONS matter. Ephebophilia and Pedophilia are different.
By angrily insisting on there being no difference between the 2, ironically YOU are the one creating, by implication, a hierarchy of sexual abuse, in which ephebophilia isnโt as bad as pedophilia, ergo, rape of a full adult must be even less bad than that, since adult rape is mostly what Epstein โฆ
By insisting on calling Epsteinโs ephebophilia โpedophilia,โ youโre saying that pedophilia is WORSE than ephebophilia, and we can only get angry about Epsteinโs depredations if we pretend he went after prepubescent childrenโor worse, itโs an attempt to whip people into an unthinking frenzy.
Opening my news app just now, I unconsciously muttered โOkay, whatโs the bad news?โ Sigh. Thereโs โinteresting timesโ and then thereโs THIS.
The past tense of โto gritโ is โgritTEDโ! It is NOT irregular!!!!!
Except poor Scott Hunter, who has nobody.
Millennials and Z-ers: do you know who Betty Crocker is, and what she looks like?
After how many decades? of gay best friends in romantic comedies who make their girl best friendsโ lives the center of their own concerns, Heated Rivalry giving each of the lovers a het girl best friend who is entirely focused on them is super refreshing.
What we canโt offload to a small fraction is anything that has to be done for each individual: education, healthcare, services, etc.; and creating consumable culture, bc, unlike food or medicine, each consumable unit has to be different from the previous.
After all, with all the specialization and mechanization, only a tiny fraction of us is needed for most essential functions, as well as for political representation and reform pressure.
I was just wondering if even WANTING to spend all my work time/energy telling stories was acceptable. And this consideration made me think maybe it was.
Itโs weird to think that our society is so highly specialized and mechanized that we only need a tiny fraction of the population to produce food, when 300 years ago we needed most of us to do that.
Anyway, the question is: how many characters can a writer introduce at the beginning, and then subsequently refer to only by name, while still allowing you to remember and track them?
For me itโs about five. I think six is too many, not sure, but seven is DEFINITELY too many.
Another question for writers:
Iโm reading a book thatโs forcefully reminding me how easy it is for a writer to pile on characters without making sure their reader can distinguish between them. (Iโve even lost track of how MANY characters there are, much less who they are.) (No, I wont say who.)
I ask bc Iโm one of those who doesnโt hear a voice speaking, and I also canโt have music when Iโm writing, especially when Iโm revising, bc I need the quiet to hear the music and rhythm of the language.
Question for writers: those of you who listen to music when you write, do you also hear a voice in your head, speaking your thoughts?
And, those of you who DONโT hear voices speaking your thoughts, can you listen to music when you write?
Today's quote: "If you don't wanna be smooch-attacked, don't be so cute."
I donโt get how Game Changer couldโve been adapted into a Stucky fic. Itโs a completely different story โฆ?
Had to reboot everything to get my TV to play Paramount+. But now Iโm watching Starfleet Academy. They have a Klingon named Jayden? And whatโs with the design of the bridge? Itโs weird and ugly.
Iโm DNFing the movie version of people we meet on vacation. Itโs my least favorite Emily Henry anyway, and Iโm hating the movie version.
I think I get it: Trump and his people are so corrupt, thereโs a kind of purity in it. Where extremes meet.
*insanely frustrated sounds*
PEOPLE. "Moreso" is not a word. It's two words. And where you're using the non-word "moreso," you should simply be using the word "more." Try it. English speakers have been using "more" in this way for centuries. It's a thing.
This is regarding what?