Lindsay K Pino's Avatar

Lindsay K Pino

@lindsaykpino.com

#massspectrometry, #proteomics, and #bioinformatics | hiking and coffee | co-founder & CTO @talusbio | opinions my own

1,768
Followers
1,730
Following
582
Posts
19.09.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Lindsay K Pino @lindsaykpino.com

You wouldn't download a HPLC, would you?

(I would.)

10.03.2026 00:40 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Blood collection tube and RNA purification method recommendations for extracellular RNA transcriptome profiling - Nature Communications Here the authors provide a comprehensive evaluation of important pre-analytical variables affecting extracellular RNA quantification and analysis in the exRNAQC study, examining eight R...

Well, in case you missed all the work over the years from @jochwenk.bsky.social et al. about blood proteomics technical concerns, turns out our extracellular RNA compatriots basically have written the same papers. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

09.03.2026 13:24 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Native PGC-LC–MS profiling reveals distinct O-acetylation patterns of Sialylated N-glycans across mammalian sera Abstract. O-acetylation of sialic acids represents an additional layer of structural diversity and biological complexity, occurring at various hydroxyl pos

Pleased to share our native glycomics workflow preserving O-acetylation, detecting this labile modification in rat (53%) and mouse (9%) serum N-glycans.

Integrally, O-acetyls are invisible under standard reductive conditions.
Now published at Molecular Omics.

Link: academic.oup.com/molecular-om...

09.03.2026 07:22 πŸ‘ 29 πŸ” 9 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Review from Fia B. Larsen in @rhp-lab.bsky.social with everything you always wanted to know about proteasomal control of transcription factors (but were afraid to ask about)

Proteasomal control of transcription factors: mechanisms, regulation and dysregulation.
doi.org/10.1007/s000...

08.03.2026 10:34 πŸ‘ 30 πŸ” 11 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Graph of award probability of R35 and R01 from NIH factbook as a function of review rank percentile. As is apparent, 2025 is a significant departure, with lower award probabilities at all scores <40 and significant departures from norm, where even being in the top 10% is no longer a nearly certain indicator of success.

Data source: https://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/report/302

Graph of award probability of R35 and R01 from NIH factbook as a function of review rank percentile. As is apparent, 2025 is a significant departure, with lower award probabilities at all scores <40 and significant departures from norm, where even being in the top 10% is no longer a nearly certain indicator of success. Data source: https://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/report/302

The data is in: the NIH goalposts have shifted.

What were once almost certain fundable scores have become coin flips and what used to be likely grants have become aspirational, leading to fewer awards.

Another manifestation of how HHS policies have led to fewer awards and less science.

07.03.2026 01:59 πŸ‘ 682 πŸ” 417 πŸ’¬ 19 πŸ“Œ 60

But you're in Australia so everything is reversed anyway

07.03.2026 00:02 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

why are people who do proteomics always happy?
they're always working in positive mode

06.03.2026 02:11 πŸ‘ 41 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
a man in a blue sweater is reading a book called sensible chuckle ALT: a man in a blue sweater is reading a book called sensible chuckle
07.03.2026 00:01 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
The Bitter Lesson

Sometimes I lean towards the assumption that we humans are required to make sense of the data and provide valuable structure, but that might not be true. Chucking raw data at an algorithm and letting it churn for a while as worked out for other tasks

www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/Bit...

04.03.2026 15:43 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
In Defense of Vibe Biology The current discourse in AI x Bio is stuck in a rather exhausting barbell distribution.Thanks for reading!

Agree that LLMs are probably not going to make huge leaps in biology. The cycle times for biology are just too slow. That doesn't mean AI won't help make huge leaps in biology. Just that LLMs are probably not gonna do it.

joehorsman.substack.com/p/in-defense...

04.03.2026 15:40 πŸ‘ 9 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0
introdctory slide of the talk

introdctory slide of the talk

an AI generated image, showing a close system lab, and a more open science, accessible one

an AI generated image, showing a close system lab, and a more open science, accessible one

Today I was in Zandvoor to give a seminar on why we need to democratize Self Driving Labs. So i wrote a little blog post on it :)
vsaggiomo.com/blog/2026/SDL/

03.03.2026 20:52 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 1

"Benaj" sounds like a fancy wine variety or something

03.03.2026 21:01 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

πŸ“’ 2027 US HUPO Association Awards β€” Nominations Now Open! πŸ†

Celebrate excellence in proteomics β€” nominate a colleague or deserving leader today! πŸ™Œ

πŸ’‘ Who can nominate: Current US HUPO members
πŸ“… Deadline: October 2, 2026
πŸ”— Learn more & submit your nomination: us-hupo.org/awards

#USHUPO #Proteomics

01.03.2026 16:00 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
a headshot of David Botstein

a headshot of David Botstein

We are deeply saddened to share the news of the passing of David Botstein, a towering figure in modern #genetics and a foundational force behind SGD.
www.yeastgenome.org/blog/in-memo... #yeast #modelOrganism

02.03.2026 15:39 πŸ‘ 52 πŸ” 29 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 3
Post image

#GirlLunch

27.02.2026 19:43 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Truly the year of Seattle proteomics!! University of Washington Genome Sciences department almost had a clean sweep!! πŸ’ͺπŸ†

26.02.2026 17:04 πŸ‘ 18 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a woman is making a funny face and looking at the camera . ALT: a woman is making a funny face and looking at the camera .

*Gil Omenn , that is

25.02.2026 23:10 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Dario for Hil Omenn Award 2027

25.02.2026 23:08 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

oh I lol'd. Probably the only person in that TSA line that was smiling though ha

22.02.2026 18:00 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

This out of office from Wout is killing me (is he not on bluesky?!)

22.02.2026 17:59 πŸ‘ 8 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Waiting in the TSA line at SEATAC with this episode to pass the time

22.02.2026 15:17 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Quick proteomics question: we want to use an exogenous biotin blocking scavenger for a TurboID experiment. We tried Biolock but is very inconsistent in our hands. Does anyone have another suggestion?

21.02.2026 17:19 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 5 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

@lindsaykpino.com shares how chromatogram‑based #chemoproteomics using the #ZenoTOF8600 and #Skyline enables residue‑level detection of covalent binding events with depth, robustness, and throughput.

πŸ—“οΈ Feb 23 | ⏰ 12:30–13:30
πŸ“ Grand Ballroom AB, Hyatt Regency St. Louis
sciex.li/xoemx7
#USHUPO2026

21.02.2026 16:17 πŸ‘ 8 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 1

Hey Chromatin Friends!
Long time no chromatin question...
For many of you, CUT&x (RUN/Tag) works really well but some of you have had their frustrations with CUT and "gone back" to ChIP-Seq. Can you share your experiences in the comments!?
Would love to hear from you!
Sharing is appreciated : )

19.02.2026 16:26 πŸ‘ 14 πŸ” 10 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

New preprint! We did a systematic comparison of proteases, digestion conditions, and labeling methods for histone PTM analysis by MS-based proteomics in the Yates lab at @scripps.edu.

TL;DR: you can get great results in ~3 h of sample prep. 🧡

16.02.2026 22:34 πŸ‘ 9 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Some years ago, another grad student in the @maccoss.bsky.social lab (Han-Yin "Momo" Yang) was working on a project showing that peptide amount and TIC correlated, so could be used for normalization. digital.lib.washington.edu/researchwork...

17.02.2026 17:12 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I haven't done protein quant in years, it's not included in our workflows anymore. Admittedly, maybe we're not quite the right comparison because we have a pretty standardized sample prep process that starts with cells.

17.02.2026 17:06 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Mass spectrometry: not even once.

17.02.2026 02:08 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Looks like proteomics has hit the big time!

17.02.2026 02:06 πŸ‘ 12 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 7 πŸ“Œ 0

Well that's why you link up your InsightsBot to a ValidateBot, obviously.

15.02.2026 22:47 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0