Trump DOJ’s voter rolls grab has unearthed a tiny number of illegitimate votes
Dozens of illegitimate votes may seem significant. But 50 illegitimate votes would amount to just 0.000007 percent of the roughly 680 million votes cast in the last five national elections.
NEW: After accessing nearly half of the states’ full voter rolls, the DOJ's Harmeet Dhillon said it's only found “dozens” of instances of noncitizen voting.
Though seemingly significant, 50 illegitimate votes would amount to ~0.000007% of roughly 680 million votes cast in the last five elections.
11.03.2026 16:00
👍 236
🔁 100
💬 19
📌 2
U.S. at Fault in Strike on School in Iran, Preliminary Inquiry Says
"Striking a school full of children is sure to be recorded as one of the most devastating single military errors in recent decades. Iranian officials have said the death toll was at least 175 people, most of them children."
11.03.2026 15:04
👍 158
🔁 57
💬 10
📌 5
Errors on your credit report can raise your interest rates, block you from renting, or cost you a job.
The CFPB once forced credit bureaus to fix those mistakes. Now, under this administration, oversight is collapsing and the agency is handling fewer disputes even as complaints keep piling up.
11.03.2026 15:03
👍 249
🔁 102
💬 4
📌 5
tariffs happening for no reason and theyre making your life worse, secret police kidnapping people for no reason and making your life worse, firing thousands of government employees for no reason and making your life worse, going to war with iran for no reason and making your life worse
11.03.2026 12:38
👍 3343
🔁 853
💬 89
📌 40
“Doesn’t the fact that he is bombing the hell out of a country for no particular reason, endangering the region, and destabilizing the world make it incumbent upon you to be blunt about the problem, rather than dancing around it? Isn’t it time for clarity instead of euphemism?”
11.03.2026 15:25
👍 6
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
sleight
10.03.2026 15:51
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Great work by NYT showing Trump's war is the most unpopular ever. Supports my argument (see below) that in some ways the public rejection of Trump across the board is a very heartening development:
10.03.2026 11:05
👍 2874
🔁 827
💬 146
📌 83
important
👇👇👇
06.03.2026 01:49
👍 10
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 1
Social media created this nonsense idea that not exposing yourself to hatred is isolationist. Choosing to not spend your free time with bigots isn’t living in a bubble. I don’t need to know what’s going on at X. I won’t be smarter or more knowledgeable or empathic by being there. Neither will you.
01.03.2026 03:58
👍 18259
🔁 3471
💬 380
📌 171
Trump’s Epstein Scandal Takes Damning Turn as Dem Drops New Bombshell
As new revelations in the Jeffrey Epstein saga threaten the president, a legal expert decodes what we just learned—and lays out a roadmap to what will happen now.
"We are dealing now with an allegation that the president of the US raped and sexually assaulted a child and is now using his DOJ to try to cover that up."
If you want to understand latest Epstein revelations, @leahlitman.bsky.social explains them clearly on our pod:
newrepublic.com/article/2070...
25.02.2026 18:00
👍 5322
🔁 2367
💬 158
📌 130
21.02.2026 12:07
👍 156
🔁 78
💬 6
📌 6
👇👇👇
21.02.2026 01:16
👍 18
🔁 5
💬 0
📌 0
i really do despise this mothefucker on a genetic bone marrow level, he's like a golem cobbled together by assholes, made of all the very worst american attributes
20.02.2026 18:41
👍 477
🔁 49
💬 21
📌 5
yup 😉
20.02.2026 21:29
👍 7
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
NJ lawmakers introduce the FUCK ICE Act.
The bill "permits civil action for violations of US Constitution related to immigration enforcement."
20.02.2026 14:04
👍 5703
🔁 1754
💬 88
📌 396
It remains astounding how unfaithfully the media covers Trump’s ramblings day to day. We’re a decade into this — and his rambling gets worse — and yet the coverage continues to portray his public appearances as if they’re coherent.
20.02.2026 19:19
👍 3057
🔁 927
💬 109
📌 43
20.02.2026 21:21
👍 10
🔁 4
💬 1
📌 1
yeah, fuck this to the moon
20.02.2026 21:13
👍 79
🔁 16
💬 4
📌 0
A key point here is that Trump has no idea what he’s talking about. He’s just bloviating. That should be reflected in the news coverage, but it won’t be.
20.02.2026 19:01
👍 1761
🔁 329
💬 83
📌 25
We should try electing some kind of deliberative body that makes decisions about levying taxes.
20.02.2026 18:39
👍 3577
🔁 484
💬 59
📌 24
I appreciate all of these detailed analysis of what’s wrong with the policy, but the crucial thing to keep in mind here is that Donald Trump sincerely, literally does not understand what a tariff is and when that is your starting point, nothing beyond it really matters.
03.04.2025 13:29
👍 4143
🔁 925
💬 53
📌 36
Sorry to get radical but I don’t think it’s my job or yours to embrace, accept, understand - and certainly not to use - the thing being sold to us as AI. I don’t like any part of it, so I won’t. I’m missing out? Good, that’s what I want. You’re worried about me missing out? That’s fuckin weird, man.
18.02.2026 05:13
👍 12485
🔁 3366
💬 69
📌 147
Article: The political effects of X’s feed algorithm
Abstract: Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects1. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Musk’s platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7 weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects. Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed users’ feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to X’s algorithm has persistent effects on users’ current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.
Figure 2. ITT estimates of feed-setting changes on engagement and political attitudes. ITT effect estimates of switching the algorithm on and off (in s.d.). Left, effect of moving from the chronological to the algorithmic feed for users initially on the chronological feed. Right, effect of moving in the opposite direction for users initially on the algorithmic feed. For each outcome, the results of two specifications are reported. Blue, unconditional estimates with robust s.e., controlling only for the initial feed setting and, where applicable, pre-treatment outcome levels. Orange: conditional estimates, controlling for pre-treatment covariates using GRFs; 90% and 95% CIs are reported. Numerical effect sizes and P values correspond to the conditional estimates (all tests are two-sided). The unit of observation is respondent. From top to bottom, sample sizes are n = 4,965, n = 3,337, n = 4,965, n = 4,965, n = 4,596, n = 4,596 and n = 4,850. Tests are described in Methods. Supplementary Information Table 2.16 reports the exact numerical point estimates, s.e., CIs and sample sizes for every specification. All outcomes are standardized. Additional results are presented in Supplementary Information section 2. PCA, first principal component from principal component analysis.
X's algorithm is in fact doing what you think it's doing. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
18.02.2026 17:24
👍 1881
🔁 729
💬 30
📌 87
Typo: that’s *Talarico (one ‘L’)
18.02.2026 05:48
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Just curious: would you say the same thing about Martin Luther King?
18.02.2026 05:42
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
I don’t agree, Brandon. I don’t think his faith is his entire “schtick”; his main message is about how the focus needs to be on the billionaires who are working to divide the country.
I’m a 25+ year resident of Austin Texas, and I have watched Tallarico for a long time, and I endorse this message.
18.02.2026 05:29
👍 8
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
I don’t know who needs to hear Jesse Jackson leading the kids on Sesame Street in this beautiful call-and-response reminding them that every child is somebody, but here it is
17.02.2026 11:41
👍 21768
🔁 7743
💬 299
📌 637