Shorter quote:
Shorter quote:
Those are called tartsicles
So first of all, the DOJ's standards are....extremely fallen, I cannot imagine this happening much earlier in time.
Second, the word "intentionally" has very specific meaning and this lawyer thirty years into practice knows what it means, and the judge is being very clear about that.
I can just imagine being read for filth like this on the public record and I think I would just fill my pockets with the heaviest available objects in the courtroom and walk into the nearest river
American guy drinking a wing flavored protein espresso martini while he posts about off flavors in shou on a tea forum
Feels like something I would not want a judge to say to me, a US Attorney in their court
Which is unfortunately starting to look like the only likely resolution
Well, one way would be to reach an agreement with a different guy
It is not lost on me that Witkoff is the US envoy in both cases
Iran faces the same situation re: resumption of hostilities that Ukraine does, though I donβt suppose the folks who keep urging Ukraine to acquiesce to a ceasefire will acknowledge it
No, no, that just encourages him
A casual reminder that our current commander-in-chief wanted to nuke a hurricane
Wonβt do much, but I donβt think thatβll stop this lot from trying it
I mean, they can
Also, how many mines does it take for insurers to refuse to insure boats through there or make the rates unprofitable? How much evidence of clearance do they need before they go back to something approaching normal?
But, uh, well more than two
God, same
its donald trump forbidding iran from mining the strait of hormuz forthwith
I do not give the IRGC or any entities associated with Iran permission to mine the Strait of Hormuz. With this statement I give notice to the IRGC it is strictly forbidden to mine the Strait. The violation of ukase can be punished by law (UCC 1308 11 308103 and the Rome Statute).
Even reasonably credible *rumors* of mining are enough to get the actuaries to clench hard enough to make a diamond
Long and uncertain, and the timeline for insurance companies believing itβs done enough to satisfy them is even longer
so:
a. the Strait of Hormuz is def actually mined
b. they did ZERO planning for this
c. they're freaking out now that it's leaked to the press and trying to ensure us that 'no it's not'
They also never had a problem silkscreening on the Thunderbolt logo where it applied, so π€·ββοΈ
Hell, Apple refused to put USB3 in at all for entirely too long, but the color thing was mind-bogglingly bad and yet another thing I wonβt forgive Jony Ive for.
I was very glad that the moment Jony Ive bounced, they brought back the MagSafe and HDMI ports and the SD slot, but Iβm still a little annoyed they didnβt put in a USB-A-3 because I still very much prefer those for flash drives, yubikeys, etc.
It does seem silly not to label them for what amounts to a pretty big difference, but Iβm unfortunately used to Apple doing extremely dumb things with ports.
At least in this case the machine notifies you about whatβs wrong.
Right, in this case I donβt think charging is a differentiator, I was only using the Chromebook as an example of where it surprised me (coming from Apple world where in general every USB-C port behaves the same) and where the label actually didnβt make a difference until Iβd already figured it out.
The rise of memory-safe languages had some of us in the infosec field wondering if weβd need to find other jobs, but this has if nothing else indicated that we should remain gainfully employed for a while longer.
They get mad when people on SNAP want to buy soda