If you currently do not have a reproducible workflow where you can share data and code where possible, I expect you will soon not be able to publish in good journals.
Beyond being best practice, journals will use this to identify papers written by AI.
Plan a new project accordingly.
Thank you, very helpful! Should have remembered it was @mbialek82.bsky.social
@lakens.bsky.social I recall you were in the mix, no?
Has this ever been written up somewhere? I too recall seeing it, but can't find anything
Strictly speaking, a postdoc is just a doc who posts
Mister P is back (new name??)
Wow, this should be super interesting.
Wait, no, that's his book from 2022. Sorry!
MrP is a special case of Regularised Prediction and Poststratification (RPP)
When tests are used for decision-making, differences of this magnitude can lead to errors with potentially life-altering consequences (e.g., about intellectual disability)
Now published in Collabra!
online.ucpress.edu/collabra/art...
Using test data from TwinLife (N=9,980, Culture Fair Test CFT 20-R), we show that Regularised Prediction and Poststratification yields IQ scores that differ by up to 19 IQ points (mean 4.19 pts) from those reported in the CFT 20-R manual
🧪 🇨🇭 #IgNobel awards come to Switzerland as US unsafe for scientists
#HoppSchwiiz
www.theguardian.com/science/2026...
Most accurate portrait of modern culture currently available
Finally this long-last meta-research is done!
We examine the demographics of subject from 1000 Chinese psych journal articles & 27 big-teams science.
Findings: these participant are not representative of the 🇨🇳population, in terms of sex, age, & edu.
@btscon.bsky.social @sakshighai.bsky.social
Tired: difference scores suck!
Wired: distance scores suck!
I remember learning about what we called "algebraic confounding" in BA research methods, and how uninteresting results like these are... And yeah, they're everywhere.
A graphic promoting a book review. On the left is the cover of the book Inside an Academic Scandal: A Story of Fraud and Betrayal by Max H. Bazerman. The cover has large orange and black text and an abstract horizontal paint‑stroke graphic beneath the word “Scandal.” On the right, black text reads: “Jennifer Byrne reviews Inside an Academic Scandal: A Story of Fraud and Betrayal.” At the bottom right is small text that reads “Vol. 46 No. 1 (2026): February,” alongside a small circular logo with the letters “PIR.”
Jennifer Byrne (@jabyrnesci.bsky.social) reviews Max H. Bazerman’s 'Inside an Academic Scandal', a narrative of research misconduct, institutional response, and the ethical challenges surrounding fraud in academia.
journals.uvic.ca/index.php/pi...
Excuse me, that should be “Ted Carter resigns over The inappropriate relationship”
Just read the abstract 🫠 via Alexander Magazinov. I don't believe he is on Bluesky.
New post from me on The 100% CI. Think inside the box, part 1: The guy Euclidean distance told you not to worry about
www.the100.ci/2026/03/09/t...
this is how I access bluesky
If you want to take your mind off awful politics and look at awful science stuff instead, this is a good read: www.sciencedetective.org/scientific-d...
I have got the data
and I figured out exactly how to do my cluster analysis
all I need is a relevant question that my cluster analysis is going to answer
The Very Khornate Catepillar
Find someone who believes in you like researchers believe in pre-post differences as valid treatment effect estimates.
First PPDI Lab paper of the year, led by our amazing lab manager Sara Schwind (🚨she's on the PhD market next year🚨)! we reviewed the transparency practicesat BBI. #OpenScience 1/6
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
To catch a raccoon you must first think like a raccoon <opens a vertically merged real estate and construction agency>
A digital CAPTCHA verification window titled "Select all squares with PIPES" against a plain white background. The window contains a 3×3 grid of numbered squares, mixing literal hardware, smoking pipes, and programming syntax.
These captchas just keep getting harder #rstats
Pooh meme: bored, I don't know anything about this... smug: this is beyond the scope of the paper
editing some writing atm...
What I thought was a joke is real: you can now bet on German train delays. bahn.bet
Never, ever, write chapters in edited volumes. No one can read them, they are trees that fall in a forest when there is no one around to see it. Do yourself a favor, and post a preprint, or start a blog. It will likely have 1000 time more impact.
