Thank you! checkout.square.site/merchant/MLM...
@retractionwatch.com
A project of The Center For Scientific Integrity https://centerforscientificintegrity.org/ Daily newsletter http://eepurl.com/bNRlUn Database http://retractiondatabase.org Tips team@retractionwatch.com (better than @ replies)
We're thrilled to announce the Ctrl-Z Award, a US$2,500 prize for researchers “who discover substantial errors in their published work and take meaningful steps to correct the scientific record."
Covered by @nature.com today; read more here: centerforscientificintegrity.org/2026/03/10/a...
A researcher told us at the time that a post he found on Telegram offered authorship slots on S’s study for less than $200 apiece.
Weekend reads: The LLMs ‘willing to commit academic fraud’; ‘peer replication’ instead of review; a ‘spam filter’ for predatory journals
“I was really shocked that an article published in a Springer journal and which presumably had gone through a peer or editorial review could have such a high number of references to hallucinated articles. I can see how one or two may slip through the net, but this was a preposterous number.”
Sure, we'll retract that paper we published that someone else faked your name on.
Just pay us $500.
“The chronic ongoing problem, for nearly two decades, is that the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis proponents withhold the evidence they claim to have. When independent scientists ask to see it — in the form of materials, for example — we are attacked for ‘suggesting fraud.’”: @boslough.bsky.social
A Canadian journal has issued corrections on 138 case reports it published over the last 25 years to add a disclaimer:
The cases described are fictional.
Our Ivan Oransky sat down with @outofthelabpod.bsky.social to talk about retractions -- and why they don't have to cause career damage. He also managed to complain about the lack of air conditioning in Switzerland.
A preprint server has withdrawn a Children's Health Defense study that suggested children vaccinated in the second month of life are more likely to die soon after when compared to those who did not receive the vaccinations.
Weekend reads: Institute to stop paying fees for some OA journals; sleuths’ tips for spotting fraud; Bayer sues J&J over ‘false and misleading claims’
While reviewing her Google Scholar profile to prepare a list of her publications, psychologist Maryam Farhang came across a paper she didn’t recognize.
The article included her name and affiliation, but shevhadn’t written or contributed to the paper in any way.
We and @theopennotebook.bsky.social are thrilled to announce The Retraction Watch Research Accountability Reporting Fellowship!
-- $7,500 in funding to support reporting
-- One-to-one mentoring support
-- Four virtual trainings
Find out more here:
“Maybe, I would have been treated better if I had cited some of the editor in chief’s papers,” Bimonte, of the University of Siena, wrote in boldface in the email, which we have seen. Two days later, an unhappy editor at the journal quit, Retraction Watch has learned.
In a move one research ethics expert called “odd,” a university asked one of its professors to attend a remedial integrity course — despite their “significant concerns” the training would have any impact following findings of misconduct.
Racking up 35 retractions in just 24 months, chemist Hitler Louis has scored a place on our leaderboard.
Tune in: Our Iva Oransky will be on with Arnie Arnesen on WNHN during this hour.
Live: www.wnhnfm.org/live/
Archive: www.wnhnfm.org/programs-2/a...
Fixed -- thanks!
After reading a recent study about GLP-1 treatment in the International Journal of Obesity, David B. Allison immediately became skeptical about the paper’s analysis.
Weekend reads: Did a prof invent his own ‘Nobel Prize’?; former dean omits pharma ties; AI generated quotes found in now-retracted article on AI
A Retraction Watch story left one reader intrigued. “I’ve never seen anything like that before,” said John Loadsman of the University of Sydney, an anesthesiologist and journal editor. “I thought, I’ve got to have a look.”
A porn addiction recovery group has accused publisher Taylor & Francis of intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy and racketeering, along with eight other claims.
Our Ivan Oransky is honored to be testifying Monday at the Canadian Parliament House of Commons' Standing Committee on Science and Research on "Governance and Accountability of Federal Science Policy and Institutions." Tune in.
Sage issued a correction to its retraction in January, stating the original notice “incorrectly cited the origin of tortured phrases to the use of a large language model.”
In 2024, Di Renzo threatened legal action over a critic’s allegations about data duplications among several papers he coauthored — many of which have since been retracted.
A Nature journal has retracted a decades-old immunology paper that has been cited more than 1,000 times and, the author claims, spurred the development of new drugs.
Our list of retracted COVID-19 papers is up to just shy of 650, representing about 1% of all retracted papers in the Retraction Watch Database.
Weekend reads: CDC’s ‘unethical’ vaccine trial; The Lancet ‘refuses to retract’ letter; on the methods used to correct science