But, the main findings of this are quite interesting and important. Thanks to the authors and Cristo Rey (and funders) for making it happen.
08.03.2026 21:04
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
But, the main findings of this are quite interesting and important. Thanks to the authors and Cristo Rey (and funders) for making it happen.
We'll share similar results from a different measure and setting at #AERA26. Our focus is on measurement and the evidence is poor. My hunch: we are not seeing employers treat WBL students as capable adults and peers so they don't take the ratings all that seriously. 3/3 A conversation to continue
while not the central aims of their study, the employer measure of student professional skills is an important, open question for WBL. The authors report highly skewed reports (mean 4.11 on a 5-point scale) along with high inter-item correlations for the subskills. 2/3
Are Work-Based Professional Skills Associated with Postsecondary Entrance and Persistence? Novel Evidence from the Cristo Rey Network edworkingpapers.com/ai26-1419
I need some wisdom from the Education Research crowd: What is the status of getting disclosure for restricted-use NCES projects? Is there any movement on projects approved or submitted in the last year or so? Trying to prioritize my next steps on a project
Lots of districts cut ties over the past ~10 years. Some of the bipartisan "reform" coalition went all in on vouchers who might have been helpful. Not sure where the coalition is
Thanks for bringing this up. Story to watch. She plays the role of policy entrepreneur well. Focus on "workforce." Play on some fears/uncertainty in the labor market for new graduates. Feels in when I graduated (2007) all over again. Last problem: where are the TFA contracts going?
Seems like they went away from this as a recruitment strategy and now bringing it back around? Or maybe I haven't been paying attention
It must be very hard to publish null results Publication practices in the social sciences act as a filter that favors statistically significant results over null findings. While the problem of selection on significance (SoS) is well-known in theory, it has been difficult to measure its scope empirically, and it has been challenging to determine how selection varies across contexts. In this article, we use large language models to extract granular and validated data on about 100,000 articles published in over 150 political science journals from 2010 to 2024. We show that fewer than 2% of articles that rely on statistical methods report null-only findings in their abstracts, while over 90% of papers highlight significant results. To put these findings in perspective, we develop and calibrate a simple model of publication bias. Across a range of plausible assumptions, we find that statistically significant results are estimated to be one to two orders of magnitude more likely to enter the published record than null results. Leveraging metadata extracted from individual articles, we show that the pattern of strong SoS holds across subfields, journals, methods, and time periods. However, a few factors such as pre-registration and randomized experiments correlate with greater acceptance of null results. We conclude by discussing implications for the field and the potential of our new dataset for investigating other questions about political science.
I have a new paper. We look at ~all stats articles in political science post-2010 & show that 94% have abstracts that claim to reject a null. Only 2% present only null results. This is hard to explain unless the research process has a filter that only lets rejections through.
🎯 New open access paper: What do school websites signal about computing and who it is for? Using document data (n = 960), we examine how schools frame computer science in public-facing materials, and what that might mean for gendered participation.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Better yet, don’t collect any data: let ChatGPT make it up!
The latest from Anthropic: using Anthropic's products makes you worse at your job
AI literacy is quickly becoming a core education issue.
www.newamerica.org/education-po...
#AIinEducation
As US secondary schools ramp up WBL, we need to understand the critical role of school-based personnel to prepare students for and make sense of their WBL experiences. Nice paper.
Each Tuesday, we will signpost you to new texts available in the JVET journal.
This week we share ‘Preparing students in need of support for work-based learning: vocational teachers’ experiences and pedagogical approaches’ by My Olofsson (2025).
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
This is pretty surprising given the positive evidence. Do they think the work is done? Backbone infrastructure like hubs should be state-funded. Others are happy to fund specific project and programs.
But is the person there? Over the past year I've had several people's bots show up without them which is awkward.
New to me that OpenSciEd is thinking this way. I've got to say, working in a CS-is-required K-12 state, anyone wishing to make something like this happen has a massive infrastructure challenge.
OPINION: We cannot wait until high school or college to integrate computer science lessons
The future of work will demand fluency in both science and technology. From addressing climate change to designing ethical AI systems, tomorrow’s challenges will require interdisciplinary thinkers who can…
Buenrostro, P. M., & Morales-Doyle, D. (2024). Ditching chemistry and calculus: An axiological shift towards alternative futures in high school STEM. The High School Journal. muse.jhu.edu/article/966227
Wouldn't be the first Springer to run into issues retractionwatch.com/2025/06/30/s...
We can do a better job, I think, of supporting teachers own knowledge mobilization to local contexts. Ed leadership is further along than teacher prep in that regard. 2/2
That is fair. And I am even sympathetic to the "teacher-researcher gap" in Ed Schools, but these authors know better. If I wanted to know about teacher ed research in a discipline, I'd go to where those folks write. Tons of peer-reviewed, practitioner journals and conferences across K-12. 1/2
🧵 Postdoc opportunity at McGill
I am recruiting a top postdoctoral researcher to join my lab at McGill through the Canada Impact+ Research Training Awards Initiative. This is a rare, well-funded opportunity to build an ambitious, multimodal EdTech research program in Canada.
Anything you (or others) recommend for pre-service teachers to engage with?
Yup. This is a conversation I've been trying to kickstart. Glad All4Ed is moving things forward onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
" It may be that scaling work-based learning has been so difficult because we aren’t focused on the right things. With more information, we can better codify what works and build the infrastructure—including intermediaries—needed to support scale. " all4ed.org/blog/the-mis...
For more federally-aware folks: If ED operations are moving to other agencies, what is the role for other political appointees? For example, our soon-to-be former State Supt. is headed to run K-12 having been confirmed last month. What does that work look like?
