The only way that is happening is with lots of guns and deaths.
We don't want that.
31.01.2026 15:28
👍 0
🔁 7
💬 1
📌 0
The only way that is happening is with lots of guns and deaths.
We don't want that.
I don't need convincing, all I want from the books is what we do now. Who is running for office that is going to do something about it?
Clinton, though, just wants to be the puppeteer herself.
If anyone needs a nice uncrowded space for a couple of hours, there's a great opportunity for the week or so this will be "in theaters"
I agree they try to take over the language. "Fake news" "Woke" Makes it difficult to determine authenticity.
I'm particularly offended with the Dems running Kamala after pretending to hold a primary, where nobody would dare try to run against Biden, and then pretending Kamala won instead
Agreed. Pointing out we're being given shitty and controlled options for leaders isn't necessarily abandoning democracy, it's asking for a reference to a good candidate who is running for office to change things.
It's not that voters are to blame, it's that they're trapped, to a large extent.
The party establishments either need to be taken over or destroyed.
No, but the point is there is no "Democrats" there is just red or blue, take your pick. You will not have a say in their decisions either way.
One year after Trump was brought to Moscow for assessment as an asset in 1987.
Trump *currently* supports Russia's attempt to "reclaim" Ukraine and is quite literally causing NATO to collapse before our very eyes.
I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter.
What political organizing are you involved in? You could get, I think, a substantial percentage of people to vote single issue on this stuff. Even a few percentage points could be enough to play spoiler and dramatically influence policy.
Is it insensitive to "dead name" Prince Andrew to remind people of the horrifying extent of the societal rot which has been allowed to exist among the rich and powerful, or is it better to call him "Mountbatten-Windsor" to remind people that he's just a pathetic pedophile?
Easier said than done when there won't be any viable opponent of note, and even if there was, "funding" a political campaign appears to be an *almost* unavoidable path to corruption.
Politicians become celebrities to some extent. "Influencers" except ones that can make valuable appointments.
Seems fine to me but I think they were unfortunately effective at blocking the only chances he had while he was still at an even remotely sensible age to take on the role.
I like the line of thought. Who do we vote for?
Don't forget that Bill Barr's father, Donald Barr, hired Epstein out of nowhere for a job that gave him his foot in the door, and then Bill Barr personally handled the "suicide"
Maxwell was (is?) personal friends with Prince Andrew. Trump was a democrat when she met Trump through her Father, who died under mobland style circumstances on a boat, and she was personal friends with Clinton.
Dem/repub doesn't matter.
We need to unravel the entire network.
I'd do it for $1000, I think. Need a $100 food/drink budget and the ability to record sections of the movie with my phone.
Unless this means something like "we removed a section of 20 blank pages" then I agree.
www.primetimer.com/news/did-ice...
Quickest thing I could find, but not necessarily a reliable source in itself. I can't track down the original.
I didn't meet many lawyers who were confused about what would happen if a bunch of Trump appointed judges got power. Simply being a Trump appointee doesn't mean anything bad by itself, but he has a demonstrated tendency to favor lunatics.
The issue involved SC justices not retiring.
My district is D+30 from 2024. Trump 22,141 Harris 9,231.
I will be *really* interested to see what happens the next time there's an election. Probably I'll be disappointed.
Not that voting in D's would do much, but just in terms of visible support for terror.
How about no government funding until the Epstein files are released?
The way the center did not plan against the right wing takeover of the federal courts and supreme court in particular is a blunder that only the center could make.
11 days ago, BEFORE the church thing happened, Don Lemon was the only journalist to say "Sascha Riley" on his platform.
He has been arrested on as yet unidentified charges related to the church thing, which anyone can see is bogus.
Sascha Riley.
Looking back, some things were obvious.
Sascha Riley describes a commanding officer discovering a video of CSAM with a child who looked a lot like him:
"He said have you ever made a movie with a black girl?"
Michael Balis ("retired US army") in this video confirms that conversation occurred
#saschariley
www.threads.com/@bustertoks/...
... Now Don Lemon is under criminal investigation.
Okay, the *only* journalist of renown to talk about the Sascha Riley story is now the subject of a trumped up criminal investigation?
Hey! I appreciate it!
I'm hopeful that if push comes to shove, most Americans are good people and we are watching the most extreme of us acting out.
Be it monkey paw, evil genie, or deity telling his clay doll not to eat from a tree, most problems seem to stem from a magical entity fucking with humanity for no good reason.