Manifesting.
Manifesting.
Can't believe Iran was keeping poisonous chemicals in their oil storage facilities.
Who can reply: anyone, nobody, people who can be normal about it.
trying out a new feature, lmk if it works
And I'm sure the Washington Times Editorial Board has never expressed contempt for any president.
If I was Robert Jenrick I would not attack my political opponents on the basis of their association with people who associate with people with abhorrent views.
If he was a real journalist, Tim would be asking what the US thinks "success" looks like, and whether it aligns with anything normal people would want.
There'll be widespread suffering and death whether or not the US succeeds, because avoiding that isn't the success they're seeking.
I hope for a stunning success against a terrorist state, but it looks like the US is winning so far.
So the BBC promised Davidson and StudioCanal (who made I Swear) that any swearing tics would be edited out from broadcast, and instead they left them in despite a two hour delay, and even put a fucking microphone right in front of him to ensure they picked it up - he was sat at the back of room.
You too, huh. And I was feeling special.
They mean something. While I think it's useful to suggest that Labour supporters consider whether their vote is better used tactically, that surely can't be your entire campaign message. We have reasons to vote _against_ Labour and Reform, now we need reasons to vote _for_ Greens.
I have wonderful news.
Wouldn't be the first time Labour apparatchiks have tried to lose elections on purpose to force out a leader they don't want any more.
Hmm. I wonder if there are any other "shadow networks" that maybe could merit more attention from the Fox News section of the news media.
Controls are the thing I personally find more difficult so, selfishly, I suggest controls.
Don't worry, it's cold in space.
Oh please, do tell me about fairly unpleasant people, Peter.
This is why, despite some of the most serious of these allegations actually been having made public months ago, a lot of people are finding out about them for the first time just now. It will be the same story again a few months from now.
I wonder if the DRC shares a planet with any other nations. Perhaps ones which do have billionaires.
My house isn't on fire, so why should I pay for the fire brigade?
Recalled party glow sticks.
CPSC Warns Consumers to Immediately Stop Using Maryhonkui Glow Sticks Party Pack Toy Sets Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Battery Ingestion; Violates Mandatory Standard for Toys www.cpsc.gov/Warnings/202...
Perfect candidates don't exist, but candidates who refuse to be complicit in genocide do.
You'll never have a candidate who meets every voter's demands, but Democrats have won in the past, so clearly that isn't actually a requirement.
The belief that Democrats are The Good Guysβ’ is unfortunately a persistent belief among liberals.
I think many are fooled by the fact that many decent politicians (by the standards of politicians) are Democrats, and have confused this as representing the views of the Democratic establishment.
But mainly I don't believe that Wil thought the Democrats were (and, we would discover if they had any power in Congress, still are) genocide supporters, so he's angry at people who wouldn't vote for Kamala because of something he thinks isn't true.
I have some sympathy for the belief that since both sides supported genocide, it's better to ignore that when choosing who to vote for.
But I also have a lot of sympathy for the principle that one shouldn't vote for genocide supporters.
Well, recent history has shown that demanding a president without dementia is an unreasonable ask.
It's very hard to find out what the right-wing think about significant matters of the day, after all. You really have to actively seek that kind of thing out.
Threatening "actions & consequences" - which in the current climate means summary public execution - for calling his goons the Gestapo sure makes them sound like the Gestapo.
When a journalist starts telling the truth only long after it has been readily available to all, then I can only conclude that they either didn't know or didn't care about what was true. Either should be disqualifying.
Which people are you talking about? Journalists, or lay people? I hold them to different standards.