“thinking model”
10.03.2026 01:46
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
“thinking model”
A massive congratulations to @kevinpowell.co who’s celebrating 1M subs live, a CSS CHANNEL GOT 1M SUBS. 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
www.youtube.com/live/e5JY5Kz...
very. seems like an easy proposal for the browser gods haha
this is without a doubt the truest tech thing anyone has ever said.
but why though?
congratulations are inevitable so
i’ll go ahead and wish them!! well deserved!
this a great article. you should read this great article because it is great.
enchant.games?slug=news&ar...
Absolutely nuts. I fired up Google Gemini and asked it a bunch of questions about my own field — areas I know really well, that I write and publish in.
Literally the first paper that it told me about had a hallucinated author name
And it's live!
A new CSS generator for fancy frames (Squiggly, Ragged, Wavy, Torn, etc.). Powered by shape() and ready for border-shape as well!
css-generators.com/fancy-frame/
It's responsive and works with any elements, including images.
Play with the settings and show me your best frame 👇
i don’t think i would mind being “cookies as a society” :)
oh yeah we’re already cooked. but if ais get a pass for responsibility we’re burnt to a crisp ha
not for for industries like credit lending and insurance. we are regulated so not only do we have to test, but we also have to be able to articulate and prove how those decisions are made and what logic lead to them etc. if we can’t do that, we get sued heh. our audit trails are loooonnnggg
codebases will have to stay human intelligible (one hopes) because “i dunno, it was AI” will not/should not be a valid defense against bad things that happen to people. if we ever get to the place of “whoops AI” being ok, we’re so cooked as a society ha
humans have to approve the code because agents can’t get sued when the code does a bad. someone has to take the blame for the failures that are caused by AI. would you approve code you didnt understand but could get sued/imprisoned for? i wouldn’t lol. anyone that does is going to regret it imo
this a great article. you should read this great article because it is great.
enchant.games?slug=news&ar...
does it have web components? haha
linkedin stop trying to make games happen. it’s not going to happen.
if i used AI tools for the first time today wouldn’t i also have to write all those markdown files tomorrow to be proficient by friday? i was just commenting that i think the idea of being proficient at a tool and the tool being useful at its supposed function are different haha
but what about the 50 markdown files you have to have in order for these tools to work at all?
we all do haha. at least those of us that are Netscape Navigator years old..
i wonder how much of the apology language of LLMs is based on celebrity fake apologies when they get “canceled”? lol. i wonder what it would be if the bot companies excluded tmz/insta apology posts from training data?
it would be an understatement to say that tomorrow will be a very big day
www.kickstarter.com/projects/fon...
team i'm FIRED UP about these gnarly gotchas with Anchor Positioning in CSS.
new blog post time! I hate myself for it, but this one is about AI.
michaelwarren.dev/blog/model-c...
new blog post time! I hate myself for it, but this one is about AI.
michaelwarren.dev/blog/model-c...
if you want the comp author to have control over what the comp looks like, then SD and slots/css properties/parts are the way. if you want app devs to maintain control no matter what the intent of the comp author is/was then light dom custom elements is the way. both can exist and both are good.
third party components from the internet is always where shadow dom shines. shadow dom lets the components and the app mix and match style systems. app can use tailwind and the comp doesnt have to. how good SD and slots are depends on who you want to have the most control over the component.
This is amazing.
www.getyourfuckingmoneyback.com
i hate it here
