Contractual issues for CCS are complex, poorly understood, and expanding rapidly. I gave this paper www.pure.ed.ac.uk/admin/files/... at www.oxfordenergy.org annual Carbon Management Day 2025 on 227 March. Great discussions and much more work to be done in the field. #CCS #CDR #carboncontracts
01.04.2025 10:30
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Portuguese editorial cartoonist Zez Vaz reaches back to Tiananmen Square to call on American defiance.
15.02.2025 13:43
👍 50497
🔁 16402
💬 515
📌 1149
Beautifully done by Private Eye...
15.02.2025 10:46
👍 274
🔁 90
💬 9
📌 5
Apols, some misspelling in the above. But the sense is hopefully course. In truth, I think there’s little between us.
15.02.2025 13:53
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
The first is a restatement of the above. The second is an argument about the role of RE. Sure. If cdr draws so much RE that it undermines decarbonisation, then we’re agreed (like most people). But it’s simplistic to assume that that’s the case. And most daccs researchers with on those alternatives
15.02.2025 13:51
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
It wasn’t name calling. It was a slight surprise at your poor argumentation. Not since you have now started your points properly…1) agreed that decarbonisation has to be prioritised (never known any scholar in the field to disagree) and 2) well, your serving point is a conflation of two arguments.
15.02.2025 13:48
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
That’s hilarious. So instead of engaging with my argument, you shift the debate to your own ground. A fine Trumpian move. He’d be proud.
15.02.2025 13:35
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Yes. I literally read it. My argument doesn’t rely on any temporal distinction.
15.02.2025 13:26
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
You are being disingenuous. Both things need to happen, with the priority being on decarbonisation. Doesn’t help to be manichaean. (I’m assuming you were a literate 10y.o.)
15.02.2025 11:33
👍 1
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
Check out my running activity on Garmin Connect. #beatyesterday
14.02.2025 19:54
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Connections: Sports Edition
Puzzle #144
🟣🟣🟣🟣
🟢🟡🟡🟡
🟡🟡🟡🟡
🔵🔵🔵🔵
🟢🟢🟢🟢
14.02.2025 19:54
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Authoritarian vandalism doesn’t begin to cover this.
06.02.2025 18:47
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
A line graph showing atmospheric CO2 levels at Mauna Loa Observatory from 1955 to 2025. The y-axis represents CO2 mole fraction in parts per million (ppm), ranging from 320 to 420 ppm, while the x-axis is years.
The most iconic figure in the environmental sciences is the Keeling Curve, the CO₂ record from Mauna Loa, Hawaii.
@noaa.gov had a wonderful site where you could visualize and download these data, and now it's just gone. These data belong to us and we should not let this happen!
05.02.2025 11:38
👍 3469
🔁 1318
💬 105
📌 140
Today, we pause for remembrance on the anniversary of the Munich air disaster.
#FlowersOfManchester
06.02.2025 07:23
👍 378
🔁 34
💬 4
📌 1
Markets and Mandates — Carbon Balance Initiative
A report on the role of markets and mandates in UK policy scenarios for future deployment of CCS and GGR.
Carbon Take Back Obligations curious?: www.carbon-balance.earth/briefs-repor.... Superb work by Carbon Balance (Mirte B + @ingriduddsundvor.bsky.social ), leading academics (Stuart Jenkins + Myles Allen), and industry partners. Deserves and will get lots of attention. @oxfordnetzero.bsky.social
24.01.2025 12:49
👍 3
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Agree with everything you say George. But let’s not pretend that the PA made any meaningful contribution to decarbonisation, or ever would. It was a poor treaty, agreed in advance between China and the US. It would never disrupt BAU. Sadly.
21.01.2025 21:57
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
You can withdraw from political compacts, which is what they are.
21.01.2025 18:48
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Given the fatuity of those accords, pacts etc at the time of assent, I suspect the State Dept will not think it necessary to waste the key strokes in withdrawing from them.
21.01.2025 18:37
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
That's a more subtle point so I can give them a pass on that. wrt reporting obligations under FCCC - yep.
21.01.2025 18:31
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
@bbcnewsnight.bsky.social. On Trump/Paris Agreement. BBC Radio 4 just (at 1813) said the US is the world largest CO2 emitter. It isnt. China is, has been for about 15 years, and is roughly twice the US. Got to get the basics right.
21.01.2025 18:16
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Scientists developed the first climate models in the late 1960s (for which the Nobel Prize in physics was recently awarded!).
How have these models held up against what happened in the real world after they were published? Surprisingly well, it turns out:
12.01.2025 19:30
👍 564
🔁 237
💬 14
📌 21
Every teacher will be using this next semester. Brilliant.
20.12.2024 19:23
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Since the start of last season, Dominic Solanke has scored more goals in Manchester United matches than Antony has (5-4).
19.12.2024 21:17
👍 42
🔁 11
💬 0
📌 0
Terrifically useful/grim figure.
13.12.2024 21:52
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
The coldest of cold takes. Anyone who's thought about DAC for five seconds agrees it is nowhere near ready to deploy, too expensive, and faces huge engineering challenges. Like any nascent technology.
13.12.2024 21:37
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
COP29 - now what? | Law Society of Scotland
Pleased to say that my article on #COP29 has just been published by the Law Society of Scotland: tinyurl.com/dpd4jbws. I take a pretty dim view of the proceedings. Do tell me where I got it wrong!
13.12.2024 21:23
👍 3
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
Is this the soon-to-be-unemployed Finance Minister? Right, ok..
10.12.2024 18:58
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I wonder if Simon S also wastes words praying to his God? Although She might welcome climate change’s hastening of the rapture.
09.12.2024 20:24
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
In the Olympiad of fine intentions, does this make the podium?
09.12.2024 20:14
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0