Boatman Cryptics's Avatar

Boatman Cryptics

@boatmancryptics.co.uk

Guardian crossword setter & teacher of aspiring word-fiends. Two books of puzzles & the stories behind them: see website for signed copies or to sign up for masterclasses or to commission bespoke puzzles: boatmancryptics.co.uk

429
Followers
185
Following
481
Posts
06.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Boatman Cryptics @boatmancryptics.co.uk

QP with a GIF that pops up when you type your name

12.03.2026 22:40 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Ah yes, fax machines! When did I last see one of those? I wonder why they don't at least give you an email address - must be easier for them than maintaining a fax machine, and less fuss for the reader than using something like hellofax.

09.03.2026 13:22 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Happy anniversary! Good to have you in the cruciverbial universe …

09.03.2026 09:02 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Excellent! Good luck with the prize if you submit it …

08.03.2026 22:31 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Good to hear … the night is young!

07.03.2026 21:52 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Heh heh … Knew you’d get there!

Thank you - and you’re welcome!

07.03.2026 18:54 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

You’ll be fine with 29. As for 22 …

07.03.2026 17:39 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Interesting ... I suppose other three-letter words are available, but I don't think any of them would fit the clue! All will become clear when discussed next Saturday, I'm sure ...

And you're welcome!

07.03.2026 15:21 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Heh heh ...

06.03.2026 13:34 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Well, you say that *now* …

06.03.2026 12:19 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

In @theguardian.com crossword tomorrow - no hints, as prizes are at stake - enjoy!

06.03.2026 08:57 πŸ‘ 15 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 1

I can’t help trying to turn β€œGregor Samsa found himself transformed into a gigantic insect” into an anagram clue, but it only seems to lead to MAGA GROSSER, which, evocative though it may be, is not something I’m planning on using.

06.03.2026 07:59 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

It appears to be World Book Day, so here are two books to celebrate. Crosswords! And the stories behind them!
Both available from all booksellers, or signed copies online from
boatmancryptics.co.uk/crossword-bo...

05.03.2026 14:40 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

"would otherwise receive immediate access to welfare and social housing" is BS.

Correct: "after 5 years working in a care home, would be eligible to apply for welfare and social housing on the same basis as the rest of us."

www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

Deliberately misleading/disingenous.

05.03.2026 08:11 πŸ‘ 425 πŸ” 178 πŸ’¬ 32 πŸ“Œ 20

FOLLOW-UP FACT: something something blind Old Testament prophet born BCC

05.03.2026 08:08 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Brava! What will they make of it ?!?

03.03.2026 22:25 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Peter Mandelson - anagrams

… etc etc … There are years’ worth of untapped material here … m.anagramgenius.com/archive/pete...

03.03.2026 22:22 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Very nice! Both excellent ’grams with great use of monster vocabulary, but you get the bonus point for the embedded clue.

01.03.2026 22:29 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Ah, them! Yes, there is a sort of indirect Swiftyness about this - a meta-Swifty, if you like?

01.03.2026 07:36 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

… and a pretty good underlying principle is that if you can’t use normal grammar (however whimsically applied!) to read the wordplay as an instruction that will lead you to the solution then there’s a problem.

28.02.2026 19:57 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

… they’re going to be verbs, ok? My puzzle, my rules” and it’s ok to break rules, up to a point - plenty of people would say that I break rules that they believe shouldn’t be broken - but you have to have some shared understanding with the solver, otherwise anything you write could mean anything …

28.02.2026 19:57 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

… it’s still an adverb and it still means something about first instances; β€œfirst”, on the other hand, is always an adjective and it doesn’t mean anything like β€œfirst of”, so (although it’s very, very beguiling) to make β€œfirst class” work, you have to say β€œlook, if I want adjectives to be verbs …

28.02.2026 19:57 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

That’s the thing, though: you have to make it do something that’s not just a whimsical extension of its everyday meaning but is actually at odds with it. It’s true that β€œprimarily” doesn’t normally mean β€œconsidering the primary parts of”, but in its whimsical crossword usage …

28.02.2026 19:57 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

... On the other hand, we don't like constructions like "first class" as an attempt to indicate the letter C, because, however whimsically you try, any meaningful interpretation still comes out as "class that is first" and not "first of class".

28.02.2026 18:55 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

... it's much less whimsical than, say, interpreting "shellfish" as meaning "rather like a shelf". The same thing applies to "primarily", which doesn't normally mean "considering only the first part of" but which can mean "relating to the first instance of", and that's pretty close. ...

28.02.2026 18:55 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

... whimsy, and it does say what it means once you understand that a cryptic clue is likely to be playing with letter order and position - you don't have to justify it by saying "look, it's just a weird thing that crosswords do and which you have to learn". ...

28.02.2026 18:55 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I'm not sure that I could give you a name for it, exactly, other than that it's a whimsical usage: "oddly" doesn't mean "selecting the odd instances of" in real life, but it does mean "having odd characteristics", which is what the odd numbered houses in a street have, so it's not an outrageous ...

28.02.2026 18:55 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Yours is more publishable than mine and less likely to get you barred from entry to the States for a few years.

28.02.2026 16:14 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Someone in the "war" dept likes anagrams. PRICEY F.U.

28.02.2026 16:13 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Badly contrived, pricey f.u. (4,4)

28.02.2026 16:11 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0