Slurms MacKenzie's Avatar

Slurms MacKenzie

@slurmsmackenzie

Slurm for the Slurm God. Party on, contest winners Bluesky's official cheeky handsome guy Premier Sex Bomb poster

4,706
Followers
919
Following
2,508
Posts
09.12.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Slurms MacKenzie @slurmsmackenzie

Someone calling themselves a YIMBY is one of the biggest red flags that you're about to deal with an absolute bellend

10.03.2026 14:14 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I've already had some shitstain turn up in my mentions going "NATO! NIMBYS! WAH WAH WAH!" lol

10.03.2026 14:07 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Go take your bollocks somewhere else you utter fucking dork lol

10.03.2026 14:04 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

And certainly not actually studied, just dismissed based on vibes

10.03.2026 13:32 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I would be very keen to know what sums they mean and what areas they are ignoring in their policy portfolio

10.03.2026 13:32 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It's wild in particular how they are ignoring that on environment and conservation that they're basically the only party with a policy positions, and given the financial, security, and *existential* threat of climate change it's fascinating how that's seen as frivolous

10.03.2026 13:27 ๐Ÿ‘ 5 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm not even a Green member and this is pissing me off, why on earth are people even contemplating this discussion based on the bullshit of think thank weirdos, journalists, and right wing creeps? Have some self-respect and stand by the fact that the policies are proven

10.03.2026 13:15 ๐Ÿ‘ 21 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

You can level it far more strongly at every other party! The centrist and right wing parties are not providing an evidence led approach to policy or governance. This is very, *very* clear through climate, inclusion, foreign policy, and more

10.03.2026 12:55 ๐Ÿ‘ 48 ๐Ÿ” 4 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 8 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Hi Mark, quick question, why are the only people who like your posts massive fucking transphobes? A follow up, are you happy with the only people who agree with you being massive fucking transphobes?

10.03.2026 12:40 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

My thoughts about NIMBYism is that a lot of the pushback against it turned out to be deregulation of the building industry in a trenchcoat

10.03.2026 11:25 ๐Ÿ‘ 73 ๐Ÿ” 12 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

We know what fucking works and we have known for ages. It just gets entirely ignored by the sentient briefcases and their chums in the media. Instead, they keep going *against* best practice for governance and policy, because it doesn't suit their interests as power holders.

10.03.2026 10:46 ๐Ÿ‘ 47 ๐Ÿ” 5 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Lots of people pointing out that the Centrist Dad approach of the last 20 years has utterly failed, but it's worth noting that the idea that the Greens aren't big or clever enough itself is a total fucking lie.

Their policies are evidence-based, *instead* of the vibes-based approach of Labour/Cons

10.03.2026 10:44 ๐Ÿ‘ 99 ๐Ÿ” 16 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 12 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I can think of three off the top of my head but yeah it is slim pickings

10.03.2026 09:52 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yeah they're two of the very few who I think it might be worth having a conversation with. Still concerned that they've stuck with it this long but at least we know they've publicly rebelled and backed it up with their votes against the whip in parliament

10.03.2026 09:50 ๐Ÿ‘ 7 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Bingo. The labour mps who did stand up against the party since 2024 exist, but there are fuck all of them

10.03.2026 09:43 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yeah you can't be a party of change and hope when you're accepting the party of stagnation and bigotry into the fold

10.03.2026 09:43 ๐Ÿ‘ 8 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Oh and exclude any of the 2024 influx by default, those cunts ran on the Starmer ticket, they knew exactly what they were in for and exactly what Labour stood for at that point

10.03.2026 09:42 ๐Ÿ‘ 81 ๐Ÿ” 8 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yup exactly so

10.03.2026 09:41 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Exactly

10.03.2026 09:39 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

So few have actually had the backbone to stand by what's right, anyone else is an opportunist looking to save their job imo

10.03.2026 09:37 ๐Ÿ‘ 4 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Like what value do they bring to the Greens? Is it enough to bring down Labour as a governing party? Unlikely. They can go independent if they want though

10.03.2026 09:36 ๐Ÿ‘ 8 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yeah, who has actually stood up to their values and the former values of their party? It's single digits

10.03.2026 09:34 ๐Ÿ‘ 13 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

That's a really good point as well, it's undemocratic and if Greens actually want to build trust in their values they need to act accordingly tbh

10.03.2026 09:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 8 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

So few Labour MPs have stood up to the party on any of its failings in office. So many have simply toed the line and, at most, made performative actions about it

They are cowards and/or villains, are undoubtedly corrupt, and should be held at arm's length appropriately imo

10.03.2026 09:30 ๐Ÿ‘ 109 ๐Ÿ” 11 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Maybe this might be unpopular but there aren't many that should be welcomed in. Instead find good local candidates to take their fucking seats and get these freeloading gravy train fucks out of there

10.03.2026 09:26 ๐Ÿ‘ 427 ๐Ÿ” 74 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 30 ๐Ÿ“Œ 9

Sarah Sackofshit

10.03.2026 08:35 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ed Sheeran for flight, Mumford and Sons for fight

10.03.2026 08:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Absolutely cannot beat Holy Diver for me, iconic

10.03.2026 08:08 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Dio - Holy Diver
Dio - Holy Diver YouTube video by Dio: The King of Rock 'n' Roll

Good Morning, gang

10.03.2026 07:28 ๐Ÿ‘ 12 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image
09.03.2026 10:01 ๐Ÿ‘ 3122 ๐Ÿ” 645 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 21 ๐Ÿ“Œ 75