now we're talking
now we're talking
"Jesus was majority culture in his region"
rt if u hate nazis and love boobs
It's looking increasingly like these guys thought that if they could wreak more death and destruction than the other side then they would be respected as strong powerful men and they would "win" and that would make them big important heroes. Very possibly they had no rationale deeper than that.
You're going to have to do much better than pointing out environmental harm to debunk capitalist "myths" about human welfare, because they're not myths.
You're on a website arguing with random people because you've been freed of the personal labor that was required to live thousands of years ago.
gonna need to break out the meme for this one
blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2026/03/tony...
it was going to happen, death comes for us all. but man. what a legend
OSS software updates are amazing. What do you mean it got better for free?
Like async is completely transforming the function and essentially lying about the return value and much of the control flow, whereas borrows are just a verification step
Are they? What am I missing that it wouldnβt just be the common denominator, not-shared and not-mutable? Basically exactly the same as mut except that it can only call ~m and immutable stuff.
Could an empire in decline do THIS? *launches deeply unpopular invasion cementing status as lunatic-led pariah state, its not clear what kind of move i was trying to do*
Foxtrot creator Bill Amend, I was not familiar with your game
Really want to know what the keyword generics / βjust make it generic over sync / asyncβ crowd will make of this.
Async is an entirely different execution mode! It isnβt just annoying sugar for sequential procedures!
I agree with @lucretiel.me that async functions are *fundamentally* different from sync functions in a way that you should not attempt to abstract over (as Yosh and others' "keyword generics" proposal once pitched).
Would love to instead have seen something like
fn sleep(time: Duration) -> impl Future<()>, async move {
β¦
}
Iβve entirely come to believe that `async fn` is probably a misfeature for this specific reason, the way it occludes understanding that `Future` is the fundamental async primitive.
And listen your Granny lied for your Granddaddy's ego, but US census data doesn't give a damn about his feelings. Women have always worked because that's the norm.
Itβs frustrating because thereβs plenty of keyword generics I do want. Iβve been agitating for βgeneric mutabilityβ
fn get<~m>(& ~m self, idx: size) -> &~m Item
for ages.
I just donβt think async is a good place for it.
framing this as an "error" is doing everyone responsible a huge favour they don't deserve. the entire administration should be up on war crimes charges and the data centres should be permanently shut down
Stationfall is the greatest board game ever made for the simple reason that, in a game about trying to survive a crashing space station, it's both mechanically possible and strategically justifiable to steal a billionaire's dog at gunpoint and then eject him out into space through an airlock
This looks awesome and also I love how thereβs roughly one kind of game that springs from the mind of a rust developer
I am endlessly fascinated by the things it's bad at. Like apparently it's actually very difficult to get an LLM to play chess *poorly*, because BAD chess moves are so wildly underrepresented in the training corpus.
Absolutely the most underexplored area for these things imo is in enabling them to create custom 1-off UIs to interact with the user in the course of a planning phase
The meme with a guy and two girls. The guy is labeled 1:59 AM. His girlfriend islabeled 2 AM. The cute girl coming the other way is labeled 3AM.
The US and Canada go to Daylight Savings Time tomorrow morning.
The push from writing to video is literally a Facebook invention.
There's something deeply obscene and broken about the fact that Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth are bombing elementary schools in an illegal war of aggression, and there's still a sense among the opposition that it has to be explained in terms of gas prices in order to get American voters to care.
This thing has a far more plausible case for being _arguably_ sentient than any token predictor