a hangry mouse's Avatar

a hangry mouse

@oscillatory.net

flexoelectric

154
Followers
677
Following
185
Posts
15.11.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by a hangry mouse @oscillatory.net

Preview
Pattern Index, by Max Cooper from the album Feeling Is Structure

maxcooper.bandcamp.com/track/patter...

11.03.2026 02:23 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Wow. Foraminifera!

ROV pilots paused and carefully zoomed in to collect footage of these single-celled microorganisms, or protists, at 843 m during the #OBVI #LivingBioreactors expedition w/ @schmidtsciences.bsky.social offshore of Argentina. Read the full caption: youtube.com/shorts/Yv_ud...

10.03.2026 18:00 πŸ‘ 194 πŸ” 65 πŸ’¬ 6 πŸ“Œ 16
Video thumbnail

had to add the lumped capacitor

09.03.2026 03:14 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

For Kai Dao, we decided the track would be compromised if we took it away from its original form. It’s a little burst of positivity, written & performed entirely on synthesisers: gogopenguin.lnk.to/calltothevoid

#synths #synthesizer #modularsynth #electronica #electronicmusic

06.03.2026 10:30 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Prediction: AI will make formal verification go mainstream β€” Martin Kleppmann’s blog

do you have thoughts on the examples i provided or are your contributions limited to uninformed sneering? one thing i didnt even mention is how big formal verification is probably about to get martin.kleppmann.com/2025/12/08/a...

07.03.2026 15:11 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

a fun thing to do for papers with good source code available is to git clone the paper repo, drop the paper pdf in, and then tell claude to, for example, write an interactive opengl visualization of Figure 4 (adding the plot from Figure 2 on top) with sliders for playing with the parameters

06.03.2026 17:53 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Magnetic Fields:
Find a central metaphor that's so good that everything aligns to it. Design meetings are no longer necessary, it designs itself. The metaphor should be crisp and fun.

Smalltalk is object-oriented, but it should have been message oriented.

Snobbery:
Turn up your nose at good ideas. You must work on great ideas, not good ones.

Appreciate mundanity: after all, a pencil is high technology

One goal: the computer disappears into the environment

The computer shouldn't act like it knows everything.

The whole notion of 'programming language' is wrong.

Magnetic Fields: Find a central metaphor that's so good that everything aligns to it. Design meetings are no longer necessary, it designs itself. The metaphor should be crisp and fun. Smalltalk is object-oriented, but it should have been message oriented. Snobbery: Turn up your nose at good ideas. You must work on great ideas, not good ones. Appreciate mundanity: after all, a pencil is high technology One goal: the computer disappears into the environment The computer shouldn't act like it knows everything. The whole notion of 'programming language' is wrong.

Combobulating...

05.03.2026 19:02 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

vibecoded signal generator, now without the sine peaks cut off

04.03.2026 20:22 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image

it's not just programming any more. Claude Opus 4.6 is a pocket mathematician. an unreliable one, but experts can get real results from these things, it seems.

04.03.2026 16:02 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

That's a lot of proofs:

> In two weeks, Gauss then autoformalized the 24-dimensional case using only the original paper as input, performing autonomous literature searches when needed. This brought the total sphere packing formalization from 70k to ~200k lines.

03.03.2026 16:09 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Using Gauss, we have helped formally verify the sphere packing problem in dimensions 8 and 24 β€” certifying that the E8 lattice and the Leech lattice achieve the densest possible arrangements of non-overlapping spheres in their respective dimensions.

> In just 5 days, Gauss automatically proved all remaining results needed to verify the result in 8 dimensions. The Sphere Packing team estimated that the 8-dimensional case alone would have taken six more months of work with existing tools.

www.math.inc/sphere-packing

03.03.2026 16:09 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

but then you have the problem of making some backend system that categorizes all the possible topics that people are posting about. this is at minimum LLM-complete, and doing this at bluesky scale seems to require a lot of infrastructure!

03.03.2026 15:09 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Your feed was then often things about the topics you followed, but somethings adjacent topics that the recommendation algorithm thinks you may also like. in this model, I suppose the idea would be to extract topics from a user's bluesky interactions and blog posts.

03.03.2026 15:09 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Screenshot from Maven's page for the "RLHF" tag, showing other users following that topic and what other topics they follow

Screenshot from Maven's page for the "RLHF" tag, showing other users following that topic and what other topics they follow

yeah I think "how do you register interest in topics in this system" is not fully worked out in my mind. On maven (I discovered it's still up, app.heymaven.com) every post has topics extracted automatically, and then each user had to follow individual topics, and you could see what everyone followed

03.03.2026 15:09 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image

Kenneth Stanley talks about this in www.youtube.com/watch?v=73sv..., the phrase "what is transformative to you cannot be decided through consensus" has been rattling around in my brain ever since (esp. as I browse For You, unfortunately). I wish atproto was more mature when he'd tried making this

01.03.2026 23:02 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 1
Video thumbnail

added a voltage vs time plot and Gaussian signals

01.03.2026 21:56 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Transmission Line reflections

a custom visualization, mostly vibecoded. still needs work, but source here: tangled.org/oscillatory...., and i deployed a version here: dev.oscillatory.net/tline-viz/

28.02.2026 15:40 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

impedance discontinuities

28.02.2026 03:01 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

still bouncing around

26.02.2026 21:48 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Because of the scaling work, I became completely absorbed
with how the exponential increase in complexity of integrated
circuits would change the way that we think about computing.
The viewpoint of the computer industry at the time was an out-
growth of the industrial revolution; it was based on what was
then called β€œthe economy of scale.” The thinking went this way:
A 1000-horsepower engine costs only four times as much as a 100-
horsepower engine. Therefore, the cost per horsepower becomes
less as the engine is made larger. It is more cost effective to make
a few large power plants than to make many small ones. Effi-
ciency considerations favor the concentration of technology in a
few large installations. The same must be true of computing. One
company, IBM, was particularly successful following this strat-
egy. The β€œComputing Center” was the order of the dayβ€”a central
concentration of huge machines, with some bureaucrat β€œin charge”
and plenty of people around to protect the machines from anyone
who might want to use them. This model went well with the bu-
reaucratic mindset of the timeβ€”a mindset that has not totally
died out even today.
But as I looked at the physics of the emerging technology, it
didn’t work that way at all. The time required to move data is set
by the velocity of light and related electromagnetic considerations,
so it is far more effective to put whatever computing is required
where the data are located. **Efficiency considerations thus favor the
distribution of technology, rather than the concentration of tech-
nology.** The economics of information technology are the reverse
of those of mechanical technology.

Because of the scaling work, I became completely absorbed with how the exponential increase in complexity of integrated circuits would change the way that we think about computing. The viewpoint of the computer industry at the time was an out- growth of the industrial revolution; it was based on what was then called β€œthe economy of scale.” The thinking went this way: A 1000-horsepower engine costs only four times as much as a 100- horsepower engine. Therefore, the cost per horsepower becomes less as the engine is made larger. It is more cost effective to make a few large power plants than to make many small ones. Effi- ciency considerations favor the concentration of technology in a few large installations. The same must be true of computing. One company, IBM, was particularly successful following this strat- egy. The β€œComputing Center” was the order of the dayβ€”a central concentration of huge machines, with some bureaucrat β€œin charge” and plenty of people around to protect the machines from anyone who might want to use them. This model went well with the bu- reaucratic mindset of the timeβ€”a mindset that has not totally died out even today. But as I looked at the physics of the emerging technology, it didn’t work that way at all. The time required to move data is set by the velocity of light and related electromagnetic considerations, so it is far more effective to put whatever computing is required where the data are located. **Efficiency considerations thus favor the distribution of technology, rather than the concentration of tech- nology.** The economics of information technology are the reverse of those of mechanical technology.

the dream of the 90s

22.02.2026 23:44 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Spin 1/2 Simulation in Elastic Solid (Simplified Version, Chantal Roth) - JSFiddle - Code Playground JSFiddle - Test your JavaScript, CSS, HTML or CoffeeScript online with JSFiddle.

jsfiddle.net/Chenopdodium...

22.02.2026 19:16 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Mathematics in the Library of Babel β€” Daniel Litt Mathematics isn't only about saying true things. It's about asking the right questions, being confused, stumbling about, getting distracted, being wrong, recognizing when you're wrong, being stuck. Mo...

Some thoughts on AI and math, inspired by β€œFirst Proof”: www.daniellitt.com/blog/2026/2/...

21.02.2026 22:42 πŸ‘ 87 πŸ” 26 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 13

Phasor Agents: Oscillatory Graphs with Three-Factor Plasticity and Sleep-Staged Learning
https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04362

09.01.2026 18:14 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
"Be the Signal"

I ~ v x C_L

where:
I = current out of our foot
v = speed with which we move down the line, charging up regions
C_L = capacitance per length of the line

"Be the Signal" I ~ v x C_L where: I = current out of our foot v = speed with which we move down the line, charging up regions C_L = capacitance per length of the line

Be the Signal

15.02.2026 18:58 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
moving repos between knots #267 hellooo, this might have been explained somewhere before, but it doesn't seem possible to move repos between knots and have them show up on the appview. i've tried editing the record to point to a d...

just set up a tangled.org knot for fun. you can't yet migrate an existing repo to a new knot (tangled.org/tangled.org/...), but it's easy enough for me to re-create my repos since they currently don't have state outside of git

13.02.2026 22:47 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

impedance mismatch

13.02.2026 01:32 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

so the kanye seeddance video didn't give me me too much motion sickness, but this one does. it's the rapid camera pull back that does it. it's been years, seems like the labs are never going to fix this problem. looking forward to a glorious future of AI-generated ads that literally make me nauseous

12.02.2026 04:12 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

new end of winter metric just dropped: the day that Veronika starts removing her winter coat

11.02.2026 20:51 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

β™«β™ͺ the best part of waking up is rainbows in your cup β™ͺβ™«

09.02.2026 18:49 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

yeah, the flip side of my post above is "i am not a computer scientist, so I will not be learning git, and AI will handle all of my version control tasks". there's two LLM modes: running straight through complexity walls that I don't care about, and delving into the gaping maw of complexity i do

09.02.2026 18:14 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0