Trending
Matt El's Avatar

Matt El

@mrmrleonard

You know I know that I think that you know

106
Followers
201
Following
149
Posts
13.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Matt El @mrmrleonard

"please rate your purchase experience"

absolutely not, I paid in currency for goods or services which you then delivered, I do not need to validate your weird need for validation afterward

11.03.2026 22:36 πŸ‘ 223 πŸ” 24 πŸ’¬ 11 πŸ“Œ 3

Maybe don’t take off a defender for Garnacho when your team’s on the ropes, Liam…

11.03.2026 21:56 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Ha! It’s the night for it πŸ’™

11.03.2026 20:30 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Barcola can never finish but of course he hits a thraker against us

11.03.2026 20:14 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
accuracy of advice provided to the Cabinet under their names. Those
were and are requirements of the principle of Cabinet solidarity. But
that does not mean that the presenting and portfolio ministers were
(or presumably are) expected to examine or interrogate each
proposal they brought to Cabinet with the time, skill and insight of
the departmental experts whose role it was to ensure that the NPP
complied in all respects with Cabinet requirements. If the
department failed to ensure that an NPP was compliant, the
presenting minister and to a greater or lesser extent the portfolio
minister were ultimately responsible; but not necessarily, if at all,
because of any personal failing on the part of those ministers to do
what was to be expected of a competent minister in the presenting
or portfolio minister’s position. Neither presenting ministers nor
portfolio ministers had or presumably have the time, or in most
cases ability, to reinterpret or re-examine matters covered in the
checklist; especially the question of whether legislation is required.
Ministers were, and presumably still are, expected to and did rely on
the warranty of the secretaries of the departments who had signed
off on their Cabinet submissions.

accuracy of advice provided to the Cabinet under their names. Those were and are requirements of the principle of Cabinet solidarity. But that does not mean that the presenting and portfolio ministers were (or presumably are) expected to examine or interrogate each proposal they brought to Cabinet with the time, skill and insight of the departmental experts whose role it was to ensure that the NPP complied in all respects with Cabinet requirements. If the department failed to ensure that an NPP was compliant, the presenting minister and to a greater or lesser extent the portfolio minister were ultimately responsible; but not necessarily, if at all, because of any personal failing on the part of those ministers to do what was to be expected of a competent minister in the presenting or portfolio minister’s position. Neither presenting ministers nor portfolio ministers had or presumably have the time, or in most cases ability, to reinterpret or re-examine matters covered in the checklist; especially the question of whether legislation is required. Ministers were, and presumably still are, expected to and did rely on the warranty of the secretaries of the departments who had signed off on their Cabinet submissions.

NACC lets Morrison off the hook, believing Ministers shouldn't be expected to "examine or interrogate" new proposals like Robodebt. They say Ministers also don't have the time or ability (??) to ensure programs are compliant with the law.

What...do they think we're paying these people to do?

11.03.2026 02:10 πŸ‘ 169 πŸ” 46 πŸ’¬ 6 πŸ“Œ 9
Preview
two people are dancing in a crowd and one of them is saying we 're not worthy ! we 're not worthy ! ALT: two people are dancing in a crowd and one of them is saying we 're not worthy ! we 're not worthy !
10.03.2026 23:34 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Seeing that handling on display, will Kinsky be able to catch the plane home?

10.03.2026 21:52 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Kinsky having a Karius. Actually no worse than that

10.03.2026 20:23 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

The existence of a "Shield of the Americas" suggests the ascendance of a "Hydra of the Americas"

05.03.2026 23:56 πŸ‘ 94 πŸ” 14 πŸ’¬ 9 πŸ“Œ 3

Garnacho is so shockingly ordinary is it quite incredible

04.03.2026 21:21 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

YES

04.03.2026 20:54 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
GribblesGoBag @GribblesGoBag
Follow
.β€’β€’
Smascbyjeffchastair
Remember who we are fighting for!
10:42 AM β€’ Feb 28, 2026 β€’ 2,893 Views

GribblesGoBag @GribblesGoBag Follow .β€’β€’ Smascbyjeffchastair Remember who we are fighting for! 10:42 AM β€’ Feb 28, 2026 β€’ 2,893 Views

it’s probably fine that this meme is one of the top posts on every military Reddit sub right now

01.03.2026 01:48 πŸ‘ 5338 πŸ” 1421 πŸ’¬ 36 πŸ“Œ 42

Yellow for Palmer for holding Saka on a break but absolutely zero consequences for Saliba rugby tackling Joao Pedro in the box?!?! The use of the commentator phrase β€œNot enough in it for me” is now the second most maddening phrase in #football after β€œVAR is going to have a look at that”…

01.03.2026 23:17 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Yellow for Palmer for holding Saka on a break but absolutely zero consequences for Saliba rugby tackling Joao Pedro in the box?!?! The use of the commentator phrase β€œNot enough in it for me” is now the second most maddening phrase in football after β€œVAR is going to have a look at that”…

01.03.2026 23:16 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Anthropic: We lost a contract because we refuse to build Skynet.

OpenAI: We'll do it

28.02.2026 03:14 πŸ‘ 1585 πŸ” 514 πŸ’¬ 70 πŸ“Œ 28
Post image

Anthropic responds to Hegseth. www.anthropic.com/news/stateme...

28.02.2026 02:15 πŸ‘ 8508 πŸ” 2586 πŸ’¬ 311 πŸ“Œ 237
Post image

you do eventually plan to have soccer analysis on this soccer analysis show, right?

25.02.2026 23:39 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
conversation between Meta's Head of AI Safety and Alignment and their OpenClaw bot

conversation between Meta's Head of AI Safety and Alignment and their OpenClaw bot

>be Head of AI Safety and Alignment at Meta
>set up OpenClaw
>grant it full access to your personal inbox
>it starts mass-deleting emails
>β€œDon’t do that.”
>wipes out the remaining old emails too
>β€œI told you not to do that.”
>β€œDo you remember me saying that?”
>β€œYes. I remember. And I ignored it.”

23.02.2026 23:20 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 5 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 1
Post image Post image

Was expecting a great gig last night but it was exceptional! Thanks Ben 🎹🀘

22.02.2026 00:08 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
The Andrew formerly known as Prince in a car

The Andrew formerly known as Prince in a car

The Prince formerly known as Philip in a car in the same pose

The Prince formerly known as Philip in a car in the same pose

19.02.2026 19:35 πŸ‘ 274 πŸ” 66 πŸ’¬ 11 πŸ“Œ 10

Pauline Hanson has spent decades demonising Muslims in the Senate with zero consequences, but put an anti-fascist poster on your bar wall and the AFP comes knocking. Labor's first scalp under their hate speech laws isn't a hate group and that says everything.

19.02.2026 06:14 πŸ‘ 461 πŸ” 176 πŸ’¬ 7 πŸ“Œ 7

when the creators of Idiocracy set out to imagine the dumbest possible future, even they didn’t anticipate that there would be this much Kid Rock

19.02.2026 04:08 πŸ‘ 612 πŸ” 68 πŸ’¬ 13 πŸ“Œ 2

@tonymartin.bsky.social made the mistake of actually watching The Stath’s show The Beekeeper. Utter tosh apart from a msg warning us all about the rise of scammers and fraudsters. Hope he is back on #SIZZLETOWN soon

18.02.2026 01:27 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
two people are dancing in a crowd and one of them is saying we 're not worthy ! we 're not worthy ! ALT: two people are dancing in a crowd and one of them is saying we 're not worthy ! we 're not worthy !
17.02.2026 23:36 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Now I'm finding truth is a ruin
Nauseous end that nobody is pursuing
Staring into glassy eyes
Mesmerized
There's a vintage thirst returning
But I'm sheltered by my channel-surfing
Every famine virtual
Retrovertigo

16.02.2026 21:53 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Garnacho absolutely stealing a living as a professional footballer

Scandalous

13.02.2026 21:51 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Two frames. 1. Lib Party Room, members huddled around table, one says β€œWe have no policies, no principles, no vision, no credibility, no gravitas, no consistency, no popular appeal…” 2. Same scene, another says, β€œYou’re right - Angus Taylor is the leader who best represents us.”

Two frames. 1. Lib Party Room, members huddled around table, one says β€œWe have no policies, no principles, no vision, no credibility, no gravitas, no consistency, no popular appeal…” 2. Same scene, another says, β€œYou’re right - Angus Taylor is the leader who best represents us.”

If the cap fits.
My @smh @theage cartoon.

12.02.2026 21:09 πŸ‘ 742 πŸ” 290 πŸ’¬ 46 πŸ“Œ 19

The Liberal's death spiral began in 2007 when Howard lost govt & his own seat & Costello piked out. Between 2013 & 2019 they were on life support, with News Corp operating the defibrillator. Morrison & esp Dutton proved they had lost all relevance. With Ley and Taylor we've entered the zombie era.

12.02.2026 23:15 πŸ‘ 106 πŸ” 26 πŸ’¬ 12 πŸ“Œ 0

Child’s Play (1988)
Erik the Viking (1989)
The Freshman (1990)

12.02.2026 03:25 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Can’t trust us to walk my dog etc & so on

10.02.2026 21:29 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0