Birchtree's Avatar

Birchtree

@matt.birchtree.me.ap.brid.gy

By Matt Birchler [bridged from https://birchtree.me/ on the fediverse by https://fed.brid.gy/ ]

11
Followers
0
Following
367
Posts
28.04.2025
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Birchtree @matt.birchtree.me.ap.brid.gy

Encrypted RSC is coming in iOS 26.4 Juli Clover: iOS 26.4 Beta Adds End-to-End Encryption for iPhone-to-Android RCS Texts > iPhone‌ users will need to install the second beta of iOS 26.4 to exchange encrypted messages with Android users, while Google users need to have the latest version of Google Messages. You love to see it. Next up, I’d love to see them make it work with Samsung’s messaging app, which would cover most of the US market.

Juli Clover: iOS 26.4 Beta Adds End-to-End Encryption for iPhone-to-Android RCS Texts

iPhone‌ users will need to install the second beta of iOS 26.4 to exchange encrypted messages with Android users, while Google users need to have the latest version of Google Messages.

You love to see it […]

12.03.2026 00:00 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
I waited on this rumor so long we already know it's wrong Joe Rossignol: Apple's Upcoming Studio Display 2 Rumored to Have an Unusual Feature > The tipster believes that a 90Hz refresh rate would make sense due to bandwidth considerations. Thunderbolt 5 can support 5K resolution at 120Hz without any compression, but they think Apple likely wants to ensure there will be plenty of remaining bandwidth for connecting other devices and peripherals to the new Studio Display. I drafted this a fe weeks ago, but because I'm so behind on posting, I never got this out. Now I just get to say, "nope, this one was wrong, and on the $1,699 monitor front, it's still just 60Hz."

Joe Rossignol: Apple's Upcoming Studio Display 2 Rumored to Have an Unusual Feature

The tipster believes that a 90Hz refresh rate would make sense due to bandwidth considerations. Thunderbolt 5 can support 5K resolution at 120Hz without any compression, but they think Apple likely wants to […]

11.03.2026 23:17 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
I'd like the less capable, more expensive computer, please Steve Troughton-Smith on Mastodon: > A $499 MacBook Neo with the brains of a couple-year-old iPhone can run Xcode, Photoshop, Blender, Terminal, and pretty much everything else you can think of, yet your $3,200 iPad Pro, with a desktop-class chip, cannot 😑 > > What are we doing here? I've been wrestling with similar thoughts over the past week since the MacBook Neo's announcement, and I'm sure later today when mine arrives, the feeling will hit even harder. **How is it possible that this new laptop, which costs half as much as my iPad Pro, is more capable for me in basically every way?** Let me put this another way. Without even having the laptop in hand, I can already tell you that I will absolutely be able to do my day job, all of my side projects, including web development, app development, video editing, and podcasting, all from this new device. Meanwhile, I have a more powerful iPad Pro sitting next to me that literally cannot do most of those things, or if it can, it does many of them in a hacky workaround way that would be inconvenient at best. I won't re-litigate this whole debate here, but I'm a product manager by day, and there is absolutely no way even a maxed-out iPad Pro would be as functional for me as even the cheapest, slowest Mac money can buy. Not video editing, not development, just a normal job that happens at a computer. ## Not exactly new for Apple fans Of course, this isn't necessarily a new phenomenon for Apple fans. In the early days of my time with the Mac, which was the mid-90s, I think it's pretty fair to say that Macs could do fewer things than Windows computers, and that's certainly something that I felt as a young person who wanted to play games and use music-sharing apps. But people liked the Mac because of the experience and some of the specific software that they got to run on it. They were happy to spend a bit more to get something that didn't necessarily win the feature checklist battle. From that perspective, I certainly don't have any ill will towards people who choose to use the iPad and who prefer it over the Mac. I have been you! Further, I was literally you from about 2017-2021, my iPad-only era, if you will. ## The price squeeze I wrote about this in a members post over the weekend, but I really wanted to reiterate it here: choosing to buy an iPad as your main computer is hella expensive, and with the MacBook Neo, choosing to buy an iPad as a computer is now also choosing to spend way more money. Let's play this out… I'm a parent looking to buy a computer for my teenage child. I want them to be able to use this for schoolwork, I want them to be able to use it for entertainment, and I want them to be curious about computers and experiment with what they find interesting. When I was a kid, using a computer lit up my brain in a way few other things did, and it got me going down the path that I'm on now. I'd want to allow my child to have that sort of opportunity as well. I don't need to get them a powerhouse of a device, but I'd like it to last a little while and be flexible. Looking at Apple's current offerings, the devices that stand out to me would be the MacBook Neo and the iPad Air. Technically, the base iPad could be in the conversation as well, but that's really low-end and doesn't really work as well as a laptop sort of device. ### Pricing out a MacBook Neo I will get the education discount here, so the MacBook Neo could cost me $499, but I'm going to spring for the upgraded model with 512 GB storage and Touch ID because they'll like that. This is a clamshell notebook, so obviously the screen, keyboard, and trackpad are all bundled together. All in, I'm spending $599. ### Pricing out an iPad Air Again, browsing the education store. The iPad Air starts at $549, but I'm making some real sacrifices compared to the Neo: 1/4 as much storage, a smaller display, no keyboard or trackpad. In terms of advantages, I do get a faster processor and a nicer screen that supports touch, but yeah, some of those things aren't going to fly. Let's spec up to the 13" screen, 512GB storage, and I'll add a Magic Keyboard so they can write on it. Lord have mercy, I'm spending $1,348, so more than 2.5x as much as the Neo. ## Surprise! Pricing out a MacBook Air Suddenly, a MacBook Air enters the conversation. 13" screen and 512GB storage, all for $999. ### Second surprise! Pricing out a base iPad At this point, I'm flailing. My most expensive option is the iPad Air, which is $350 more expensive than an even faster and more capable MacBook Air. Let's explore the low end of the iPad. We'll have to make several sacrifices here. This device is fundamentally slower with a several generations older chip. It also has nothing beyond a 10-inch display, and we're only going to upgrade to 256 gigabytes of storage this time. Also, the compatible keyboard isn't as good, but what are you going to do? We're skimping on this thing to save money, so what's the damage? $658 to get a much worse, smaller screen, worse performance, half the storage, a worse keyboard and trackpad, and a less powerful OS. And all that's still more expensive than the MacBook Neo. ## iPads are still a deal as a "middle device" When Steve Jobs originally presented the iPad, he showed it off explicitly as a device that could live in between someone's desktop computer and their smartphone. As people have enjoyed the product, and as Apple has explicitly changed their marketing over the years to encourage more people to at least attempt to use iPads as their primary computers as well. And what we're seeing now is that, yeah, an iPad spec'd out as a primary computer is a pretty expensive investment, often more expensive now than even the equivalent MacBook in the lineup. But if you do treat the iPad as a third device, then I think the pricing is much more compelling. You could get a base iPad Air for watching videos and doing web browsing, and you could more easily get by without a Magic Keyboard or the extra storage. And because it has an M4, which likely has way more power than you need today, you'll be able to go many years without even thinking about upgrading it. That's awesome. But yeah, if you're looking for a primary computer in 2026, as odd as it sounds, you need to really want the iPad because you're going to pay extra for it.

Steve Troughton-Smith on Mastodon:

A $499 MacBook Neo with the brains of a couple-year-old iPhone can run Xcode, Photoshop, Blender, Terminal, and pretty much everything else you can think of, yet your $3,200 iPad Pro, with a desktop-class chip, cannot 😑

What are we doing here?

I've been […]

11.03.2026 22:36 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Of course it can use pro apps. It’s a computer When I started doing YouTube in 2020, I was in the middle of my iPad era, and the only Mac in my life was a 2012 Mac mini. I don't remember its exact specs, but suffice to say it positively sucks by 2026 standards. And while it was very slow, it did technically handle everything I could throw at it, including photo and 4K video editing. _Also of note, this was a year before my switch away from the iPad-only lifestyle, and in retrospect, it was quite telling that I wasn't able to use my faster, much more modern iPad Pro to do this work. Anyway…_ I bring this up because, **of course, the MacBook Neo is able to run all of your professional apps** , and I'm glad Tyler Stallman showed this off in his video. Consider how much faster the MacBook Neo must be than a 2012 Mac mini, and tell me that you can't do awesome, creative work on this thing. Maybe there's something about the modern computing world of iPads and smartphones where we're used to professional features being gated by specific hardware classes, but that's fundamentally not how it traditionally works in computers. You can certainly spend more on a Mac, and tasks will complete more quickly. You'll have a nicer screen, and there will be other general quality-of-life things you might enjoy. But the work that a $600 MacBook and a $6,000 MacBook do is basically the same. Running large local LLMs is the only thing off the top of my head that's literally impossible on the MacBook Nano, but even then, you can run local models; they'll just be slower and less performant. So if you're someone who wants to do creative work, even relatively high-end creative work on a computer, and your budget doesn't allow you to go past the Neo, don't worry. I promise you, you can do whatever you want to do. It'll just take a bit longer than doing the same tasks on a much more expensive Mac.

When I started doing YouTube in 2020, I was in the middle of my iPad era, and the only Mac in my life was a 2012 Mac mini. I don't remember its exact specs, but suffice to say it positively sucks by 2026 standards. And while it was very slow, it did technically handle everything I could throw at […]

11.03.2026 01:04 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
New wallpaper generator just dropped ColorFlow is a really cool new wallpaper and animation generator from the folks over at ls.graphics, and it's pretty rad (and it's totally free).

ColorFlow is a really cool new wallpaper and animation generator from the folks over at ls.graphics, and it's pretty rad (and it's totally free).

11.03.2026 00:48 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Micro app 12: Benchmark Studio This micro app is pretty simple; it's just a nice, single-page website for uploading benchmark scores and getting nice-looking charts for them, like the one above. The UI for adding tests and devices is simple, allowing you to create tests and add devices with categories, so that things like laptops and phones can be separated. You can also drag to reorder them or toggle their visibility. There's a simple table for entering the scores for each device, and you can import or export the current page's values as JSON. All data is stored in your browser's localstorage and never leaves your device. Good for privacy, and good for my back end costs 😉 Benchmark Studio is available here, and you can see the full project on GitHub.

This micro app is pretty simple; it's just a nice, single-page website for uploading benchmark scores and getting nice-looking charts for them, like the one above.

The UI for adding tests and devices is simple, allowing you to create tests and add devices with categories, so that things like […]

10.03.2026 12:00 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Terraink makes rad maps on demand Terraink is a cool new website that lets you create cool maps of whatever location you want to. That's it, and that's pretty rad.

Terraink is a cool new website that lets you create cool maps of whatever location you want to. That's it, and that's pretty rad.

08.03.2026 21:57 👍 0 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0
Tom Scott on AI in February 2023 From the video: > I've been complaining for years that it feels like nothing has really changed since smartphones came along. And I think that maybe, maybe I should have been careful what I wished for. It's been 2 years since Tom Scott stopped posting weekly videos on YouTube, but he was still doing it when ChatGPT came out, and this video from February 2023, just 2 months after ChatGPT launched, came up in my feed again today. Given how fresh LLMs were to the public at that time, I think it's actually really impressive how well this video essay holds up 3 years later. Scott comes at the topic with the right amount of humility, clearly expressing the fact no one knew how far along the curve we were in terms of capability. He also spends a good amount of time discussing how he lived through the last couple technical revolutions, he navigated them well, and he'd become comfortable in the current state of the world. What I find really notable about his feelings are that he did a little coding project in the ChatGPT chat interface, and that is what pushed him over the edge into going "wow, this is already massively disruptive." For some context, he would have been using GPT-3.5 when this video came out. In retrospect, that's an absolute shit model that no one in 2026 would trust to find typos in their writing, let along being their coding agent. But even then, Tom was like, "uh oh, that's already as good as me." The pull quote I chose for the video expresses something I can't stop thinking about either, which is this seeming desire for tech to get better, to change, and to be interesting, but also for that to happen without changing anything at all. Anything that makes people more productive or could lead to the slightest bit of disruption is seen as bad. It's impossible not to think about this quote from Douglas Adams: > 1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works. > > 2. Anything that's invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it. > > 3. Anything invented after you're thirty-five is against the natural order of things. And yes, they did say "this time it's different" every single time.

From the video:

I've been complaining for years that it feels like nothing has really changed since smartphones came along. And I think that maybe, maybe I should have been careful what I wished for.

It's been 2 years since Tom Scott stopped posting weekly videos on YouTube, but he was still […]

07.03.2026 13:37 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Apple releases the MacBook Mini Apple's MacBook Mini is such an awesome computer. No, it's not the most powerful machine Apple makes, but it is very affordable, which makes it appeal to at least two separate groups. The first group is people who would like a desktop Mac, but would not like to spend typical Mac prices. Because it's so inexpensive, at least in the starting configurations, it also is very compelling as a secondary computer for a lot of people who already have a higher-end Mac or a Mac laptop. Today, Apple announced the MacBook Neo, although I would suggest the MacBook Mini would be an even better name because I feel like this computer is doing the same exact thing as the Mac Mini. At the same $599 starting price, this laptop achieves both appeals that the Mac Mini has as well. For those who are price conscious, it gives you a brand new, high-quality MacBook at basically half the price of the MacBook Air. I really think it's worth sitting on that for a second. Apple didn't just make this a little less expensive than the MacBook Air, they made it in a completely different price category and a price category that Apple hasn't been in for decades. But I think it will also appeal to people who own higher-end Macs already. I'm including myself in that camp. I have a 14-inch M4 Pro MacBook Pro, and this thing is a beast. It tears through 4K video editing and literally any task I can give it. It's an awesome machine, but it is a little chunky, especially when I travel. I'm often traveling for work, which means I need to bring my work laptop and my personal laptop. And let me tell you, carrying two 14-inch MacBook Pros in your backpack is weight you definitely notice. I haven't pulled the trigger yet, but I think I am going to pick up one of these to use as my travel computer and maybe some other things that I want to do with it around the house. And they did this in a computer that is a far cry from the lazy M1 MacBook Air component swap that some people were expecting from them. And let me reiterate, this thing is half the cost of the MacBook Air…there are compromises for sure, but it's **half the price**. * * * Before we get into the weeds, here's the highlights Apple calls out on their marketing page (aka, what they think will appeal to a wide audience): 1. They come in fun colors 2. Long battery life 3. Great screen 4. Apple Intelligence 5. Pairs with your iPhone 6. Works with all your apps 7. Privacy built in I'll start by saying I think the colors are a brilliant move, and I'm glad they decided to do it instead of making these boring colors only. I also think it's critical that this does not look like an old Mac. It looks very much exactly like the other current Macs, so it doesn't feel like you're buying an old computer. Moving on to the specs. I do think people need to set their expectations appropriately. The A18 Pro chip is no slouch, but in the testing I've done, it performs worse than an M1 in some tasks. I'm sure there'll be some things where it's quicker, but I do think that people might be surprised how it performs under load. We'll see how it performs once people have these in hand, but I do worry that some folks expect this to perform like an M4 or an M3, when in fact it could very well be the slowest Apple silicon Mac ever released. Getting a Mac down to half the price of an Air means making a lot of cuts that are painful, but the removal of Touch ID from the baseline model is the thing that surprised me the most. It's not the end of the world, and honestly, my wife has an M3 MacBook Air, and she literally never uses the Touch ID sensor. She always enters her password anyway. So there certainly are people who will not miss this, but I certainly would. 8 gigabytes RAM is going to be tight. This is definitely a device for light uses, and you're going to start to feel the pain if you try to do too much. 256 starting storage with a single upgrade to 512 gigabytes seems about right to me. I'll be interested to see the screen in person. The resolution and brightness seem fine and are effectively the same as the Air, but they don't advertise P3 color, it's just RGB. I assume it will be fine, but the absolutely atrocious display in the baseline iPad makes me recognize how terrible a screen Apple is willing to ship in its budget devices, and I hope this is a large margin better than that. I assume it will be. Despite the smaller footprint, it is exactly as heavy as the MacBook Air, so it's not the mythical return of the ultra-thin MacBook, unfortunately. The keyboard is not backlit, which I guess is a bummer, but honestly, I don't think I ever use my keyboard's backlight. Honestly, I'm not totally sure why other people use it either. Does your screen not light up the keys already? I understand that it would cost more, but I do wish that they could have put one USB-C cable on either side of the device. Going back to my wife, her biggest complaint with the MacBook Air is that it only charges from the left side when it would be so much more convenient for every single place she uses her computer to be able to charge from the right. * * * I'm writing this very quickly on my break at work, and when I go home, I'm going to find my Apple Watch Ultra, see what Apple will give me for a trade-in, and if it gets me close to half the cost, I'll be ordering one when I get home. At a minimum, this will be my travel computer, and at best, it will be my putzing around the house device.

Apple's MacBook Mini is such an awesome computer. No, it's not the most powerful machine Apple makes, but it is very affordable, which makes it appeal to at least two separate groups. The first group is people who would like a desktop Mac, but would not like to spend typical Mac prices. Because […]

04.03.2026 16:33 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
How to make Midnight City M83’s Midnight City is one of my favorite songs of all time, and this video recreating it is brilliant.

M83’s Midnight City is one of my favorite songs of all time, and this video recreating it is brilliant.

04.03.2026 01:48 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
My super quick process for adding chapters to podcasts Chapters in podcasts are super important, in my opinion, and I make sure to add them to everything that I create. Here's the process I use to get them into my shows faster than ever before. ## 0- Have your chapters ready to go The best thing you can do to speed up this process is to write down what chapter breaks you want as you record. I do this in Obsidian, which is the app I use to write the show notes, and I just have a little section at the bottom as we go where I write down the chapters. We edit the podcast, so I don't know exactly what the timestamps will be when I'm recording them, but just having them in order is helpful. You _can_ ask AI to generate the chapter titles for you as well, but I find it god-awful at that. Put in a little human work, it's worth it. ## 1. Generate subtitles Step one is taking the final audio file and generating subtitles for it. I obviously use my own app, Quick Subtitles, which works great. I personally use the Whisper model as it is much slower, but it is more accurate to the point that it's worth it to me. Paired with the cleanup feature in Quick Subtitles, my transcripts are usually very good with little effort. ## 2. Ask AI to help You certainly don't have to do this if you're not comfortable with it, but this is what I tend to do. I take those chapters I wrote out and use a short prompt to tell Claude what to do with it. Obviously, LLMs are pretty interchangeable, so use whichever one you prefer, including a local model if that's your preference. This will get you a response something like this. Copy that to your clipboard and you're ready to move on. ## 3- Import it all into Chapter Pod Now you can drag your audio and .srt files in ChapterPod, and hit `Command + i` to import chapters from text. That will give you all your chapters ready to go. However, the AI will not be perfect and you will want to go into the transcript view to see exactly where it placed these chapter markers so you can fine-tune it down to the second. In my experience, language models tend to put the chapter marker 5 to 10 seconds later than I would. So it's just a matter of dragging the chapter marker from the transcript view up a little bit. And that's it, you're done! Export the file and you'll have your fully-processed podcast file with chapter markers in less time than ever.

Chapters in podcasts are super important, in my opinion, and I make sure to add them to everything that I create. Here's the process I use to get them into my shows faster than ever before.


0- Have your chapters ready to go

The best thing you can do to speed up this process is to write down […]

03.03.2026 23:34 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
When the words on the page don’t match what you’re trying to say (follow up on the Ben Thompson post) Ben Thompson: Technological Scale and Government Control, Paramount Outbids Netflix for Warner Bros. > This is a lot more complicated than the nuclear question, where government control and ownership was a given; the sort of actions taken by the government over the last week fly in the face of the concept of private decision making and property rights. Unfortunately, those rights are not set in stone: they are ultimately enforced by someone, and the someone who is doing the enforcement is the one doing the violating. That’s not great, but it’s happening and/or will happen, and it’s important to come to grips with that reality — and I don’t think trying to describe that is at all equivalent to endorsing it. Ben Thompson posted a clarification today regarding his post from yesterday, which I described as "no good, very bad." Unfortunately, the clarification is for members only, so most people will only see the original post without the added context. He is surprised that people interpreted his original post as endorsing government seizure of private property, the idea that might makes right, and…well…fascism. I've reread the original post, and I honestly don't know how else you could interpret it. To me, it felt like him sharing his opinions on current events, in the style he always does. I have two main thoughts left. First, building on what I said yesterday about him vocally disagreeing with one administration far more often than the other, I'm positive that if this had happened under the Biden administration, there would be no ambiguity about whether he supported it or not. Second, the people who liked his post yesterday weren't really people who thought the government was doing something wrong and that Thompson was just accurately describing it. They supported the government's actions, and they thought Thompson was supporting that argument. Hell, after listening to Dithering this morning, I got the feeling he was doubling down on his support. This means that people who liked the post, and people who didn't like the post, both interpreted it differently than he intended. That's a pretty clear sign that your writing was not as clear as it could have been. That's always something important, but it’s doubly so when your lack of clarity makes wide swaths of people think you're endorsing fascism (and some of them like that!). Listen, I write for an audience of strangers. They certainly don't live in my head and don’t always understand the intent of my posts. When that happens, you just take it on the chin, clarify what you meant, and move on (see my recent post about iPadOS going away). Ben gave a bit of a classic "I'm sorry if you were offended" sort of clarification, but whatever, I'll get over it.

Ben Thompson: Technological Scale and Government Control, Paramount Outbids Netflix for Warner Bros.

This is a lot more complicated than the nuclear question, where government control and ownership was a given; the sort of actions taken by the government over the last week fly in the face of […]

03.03.2026 22:55 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Apple's new MacBooks: The pinnacle of the generation Apple announced new MacBook Airs and Pros today, and they’re both boring and mostly excellent. ## MacBook Air This looks like a very basic spec bump, which I’m not mad about. I would like to see this display get an upgrade one day, and I'd love for them to split the USB-C ports to the left and right to add some charging flexibility, but I don't think this design is long enough in the tooth to draw my ire (2027 and 2028 Matt will start to get a little antsy, though). We were wondering what the storage and RAM crunch would mean for the Mac lineup, and thankfully, it seems Apple is handling this well. The starting RAM has remained at 16GB and the starting storage has bumped up to 512GB from 256GB in the M4 model, but that also does come with a $100 starting price increase, up to $1,099. That's technically $100 less than upgrading to 512GB storage version in the previous generation, but yeah, a $100 higher starting price is still a bit of a bummer. ## MacBook Pro The new M5 Pro and Max chips look like killers. As an avowed defender of the Pro line of chips, Apple's suggestions of multiple times faster LLM performance and 40-60% performance jumps over the M4 Pro is really exciting for a single generation upgrade from what was already the best mobile computer chips in the game (the Max chips have similar jumps). What's most impressive to me about this update is that the prices seem to have stayed completely level from last year. I have a 14" M4 Pro model that I bought a year ago. It had the better Pro chip and 1TB of storage, and cost me $2,399 before trade in. Getting that same model (upgraded Pro chip, 1TB storage, 24GB RAM) in the M5 generation would run me the same $2,399. I'm not at all tempted to upgrade myself, as I'm more than happy with the M4 Pro and even with a trade-in I'd be about $1,200 out of pocket, but in a world where everything is getting more expensive and we're in the middle of a supply chain mess, it's good to see Pro Macs holding the line on price. As for the design, I'm still fine with it, but it seems like this will be the last generation of MacBook Pros with this design. Strong rumors swirl of a decent change coming in the M6 generation with a dynamic island and touch input, so we'll see how that turns out. For now, this is just an incredibly fucking fast version of the great product redesign Apple gave the MacBook Pro back in 2021.

Apple announced new MacBook Airs and Pros today, and they’re both boring and mostly excellent.


MacBook Air

This looks like a very basic spec bump, which I’m not mad about. I would like to see this display get an upgrade one day, and I'd love for them to split the USB-C ports to the left and […]

03.03.2026 15:53 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Apple's new Studio Displays Apple updated both of their monitors today, replacing the Studio Display with a new model that's very similar to the old one, and they've discontinued the Pro Display XDR in favor of the new Studio Display XDR. ## Studio Display Starting with the updated Studio Display, honestly, I'm incredibly disappointed. I continue to think the Studio Display is for people who care about everything in a computer monitor besides the display itself. In the newsroom post and the new marketing page, Apple boasts about the new camera, better mics, better speakers, and Thunderbolt 5 ports. When comparing the new and old spec pages, there seems to be literally no difference, which leads me to believe we are once again stuck with the same panel Apple has been shipping for over a decade. There are people who really value physical design, and that's fine, but if you want a great monitor that looks better than this (yes, even at 5K), there are other options, all of which cost a good deal less. ## Studio Display XDR Compared to the $6,000 Pro Display XDR Apple was selling before, this is a steal at $3,300. And truthfully, it looks like a great monitor. 5K 120Hz mini-LED with 2,304 local dimming zones is undeniably a compelling combo. One interesting thing from the press release is that while it's a 120Hz display with variable refresh rates, they don't call it ProMotion like they do on their MacBook Pros and iPhones: > Studio Display XDR features a 120Hz refresh rate, enabling smooth, ultra-responsive motion. Adaptive Sync supports a continuously variable refresh rate between 47Hz to 120Hz, making gaming more fluid with faster frame delivery and lower display latency. Anyway, this monitor looks really great, but the price is still astronomical. I paid 1/3 of that last year for a 32" OLED with 1,300 nits of peak brightness, although admittedly only at 4K resolution. Admittedly, Apple's monitor is going to be more reliable than the cheaper 5K models out there, and the brightness in particular seems properly high end here, so I get why some people would go for this. And hey, it's nearly half the price of the old XDR and it comes with a stand! * * * I think what bums me out about Apple's display lineup is that they are only serving the absolute highest end of the market, they have no truly "consumer" displays. I'm sure they think about the normal Studio Display as that, but it's really in another league compared to what any normal person spends on a monitor. I'll say it again to be super clear, my monitor is way higher end than what most people would buy…I'm considered someone who went overkill on their display…and mine cost $600 less than Apple's "consumer" model.

Apple updated both of their monitors today, replacing the Studio Display with a new model that's very similar to the old one, and they've discontinued the Pro Display XDR in favor of the new Studio Display XDR.


Studio Display

Starting with the updated Studio Display, honestly, I'm incredibly […]

03.03.2026 14:45 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
"What are you going to do, stop me? I've got the guns," is a wild government argument for tech pundits to support Over the last couple weeks, Anthropic and the Department of War have been engaged in a war of words over something very exciting: terms of use. Anthropic, as a private company, has created a product and reasonably established terms of use for it. However, the Department of War doesn't want to adhere to all of them. They went so far as to threaten labeling Anthropic as a "supply chain risk", a classification rarely used and historically reserved for foreign companies suspected of being coerced by their governments to harm Americans. Ironically, one of the fears has been that unlike the US, other countries will have governments that make demands on these companies they couldn’t afford to reject. Well, we’ve got a new administration in town, and it does things a little differently. With a Congress that won’t act and no other branch willing to push back, the executive can do whatever it wants. So when the federal government wants to use a private company’s property for its own purposes, it does what those other countries do: compels that company with every bit of force it can muster.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ That's how we got to last Friday, which was the deadline the Department of War set for Anthropic to cede control of their product in the way the federal government demanded. And Anthropic, to their credit, said no. This, of course, sent the federal government into a tizzy. They had a hissy fit, and now they're mad at Anthropic. Who knows what's going to happen, because you can't take anything they say seriously, but it's not great right now. One thing I almost posted to social media on Friday night after I heard the Anthropic news was a snarky comment about how I was sure Ben Thompson would have an article up on Monday about how the federal government is totally right. I thought that was a little mean, criticizing someone for something they hadn't done yet, even though I suspected they might. So I didn't post it. But Monday morning, I wake up, there's a new issue of Stratechery in my inbox, and yep, it is an entire post about how it's actually good that the US Department of War is mandating that a private company do whatever the United States government says, and if they don't, they will make them. There are 3 things that are notable about this to me. First, it's an on-its-face absurd turnaround for someone who has spent the last decade aggressively defending the rights of US companies against the federal government. When Biden administration staffers sent links to tweets to Twitter, suggesting they broke Twitter's terms of use, Thompson was outraged that the government would dare even suggest that a company follow the rules they had set for themselves. Now, the literal head of the Department of War and the President of the United States are telling a private company that they must change their product to work a certain way, and must update their terms of use to allow the US government to do anything legal, which, because there are no laws around AI, is basically everything (as Thompson points out near the end of his post). His position is that this is actually reckless from Anthropic, that they should update their terms to allow anything the government wants, and that the government is being consistent with American values. In short, if the government tells you how to build your product in a way that kills or surveils people, companies must comply. If the government tells you to moderate content a certain way, companies must resist. It's worth pausing on that "anything legal" framing, because it's doing a lot of heavy lifting. Thompson (and freaking Palmer Luckey) appeals to democratic accountability as the reason Anthropic should defer to the government. But where is the democratic process here? Congress has passed zero laws governing the use of AI in military applications. There are no statutes defining what "fully autonomous weapons" means, no legislation setting boundaries on AI-driven surveillance. The Department of War is not invoking a law passed by elected representatives. They are issuing demands backed by executive power, full stop. Thompson frames this as the democratically elected government asserting its rightful authority, but that framing only works if you skip over the part where the elected legislature has done literally nothing on this topic. What we actually have is an executive branch acting unilaterally, which is precisely the kind of unchecked government power Thompson has historically warned against. For what it's worth, it's hard to pin Thompson down on these things sometimes. He's railed against the "paternal" federal government making any choices for adults, and then commented on a recent Dithering episode that he thinks the government should be more "paternal" (his words) when it comes to gambling. The second part of this is that, while the inconsistency is striking, it's not entirely surprising. Like I said, I already had the post ready to go on Friday predicting that this would be his take. Over the years, for all of the great business analysis Thompson does for tech, I've seen a pretty clear pattern in how he covers different administrations. During the Biden years, he took every opportunity to criticize that administration, naming Joe Biden by name and pushing back on basically every tech-related policy. Since the start of 2025 and the second Trump administration, the tone has shifted noticeably. As someone who listens to the Stratechery podcast every day, I have not heard him direct anything close to equivalent criticism at this administration. He has a tendency to steel man anything it does. It's not just this case, either. When Trump issued seemingly random tariffs that weren't based on any sort of economic theory and were more random gestures to different countries who he had beef with. When those happened, he was one of the few voices out there saying these are actually not as bad as people think, it's actually 4D chess, it's actually really clever what he's doing. The second one I can think of is last year when the FCC was very clearly telling CBS that they would lose their license if they didn't take care of the Jimmy Kimmel situation, if they didn't limit Jimmy Kimmel's speech. And do you know what Ben Thompson's article was that week? It was something critical of the Biden Administration, of course. Like with all other speech squashing over the past year, Thompson has nothing to say about current events, he only has interest in relitigating the past. I'm not trying to read Thompson's mind, and I could be wrong about what drives these editorial choices. We all have our biases, myself very much included, and I view this situation through mine. But Thompson presents himself and his platform as someone who gives you the analysis straight without a political thumb on the scale. The pattern I think is so clear to see makes that hard to take at face value. Which brings us to the third thing I find notable. Thompson frames his entire argument around a concept he states plainly: > International law is ultimately a function of power; might makes right And he closes the piece with: > I don't want that, and, more pertinently, the ones with guns aren't going to tolerate it. Anthropic needs to align itself with that reality. "The ones with guns" here refers to the US federal government, by the way. Thompson would argue he's being descriptive, not prescriptive, just laying out how power actually works. But you can't spend an entire piece arguing that Anthropic _should_ submit, present only two options (submit or be destroyed), and then claim you're merely observing. That's an argument dressed up as analysis. And the argument itself has a name. "Might makes right" is the language of authoritarians, or as Edgar Temam wrote: > The first principle is the common meaning, namely, that the dominance of the mightier over the weaker is right. This principle is generally considered to be not a definition of justice but an expression of injustice. It's also, plainly, the language of the schoolyard bully. "What are you gonna do, stop me?" Thompson presents 2 options going forward for this situation: > Option 1 is that Anthropic accepts a subservient position relative to the U.S. government, and does not seek to retain ultimate decision-making power about how its models are used, instead leaving that to Congress and the President. Or: > Option 2 is that the U.S. government either destroys Anthropic or removes Amodei. So either the federal government mandates how Anthropic builds and sells its products, or the federal government destroys the company or removes their leadership and (presumably) inserts their own supporters in his place. The classic small government process… What I think is really telling, and is what Thompson has critiqued others for in the past, is how his entire argument rests on an unproven prediction of the future. > Current AI models are obviously not yet so powerful that they rival the U.S. military; if that is the trajectory, however… His entire premise is that AI is an even bigger national security risk than nuclear weapons, and therefore the U.S. government must have absolute control over them. It seems almost comical I need to say this, but this has not been established by reality yet. Large language models are undeniably an impactful piece of technology that will have some impact on the world going forward. But to suggest that they are more critical to national security than nuclear weapons is quite a stretch, and is regulating today based on what possibly maybe could be true in the future. This is exactly the sort of argument that Thompson routinely criticizes anti-monopoly people for expressing, but here he goes with it when it's convenient for him. And this brings us full circle to the democratic accountability question. Thompson argues that Amodei is "unelected and not accountable to the public," and that decisions about military capabilities should be left to Congress and the President. Fine. But if that's the standard, then where is Congress? If AI really is as consequential as Thompson and Amodei both claim, then the absence of any legislation is the actual scandal here, not a company maintaining its terms of use. You can't simultaneously argue that democratic institutions should govern these decisions and then cheer when the executive branch bypasses those institutions entirely. If the answer is "Congress should pass laws," then the correct response to Anthropic's terms of use is to pass laws, not to threaten a private company with destruction. * * * As I said above, I think Ben Thompson provides valuable business insights. However, I think he's drank the Kool-Aid on LLMs, he presents his writing as immune from political bias even though the pattern suggests otherwise, and I think all of his worst tendencies came together for this one no good, very bad post.

Over the last couple weeks, Anthropic and the Department of War have been engaged in a war of words over something very exciting: terms of use. Anthropic, as a private company, has created a product and reasonably established terms of use for it. However, the Department of War doesn't want to […]

02.03.2026 22:19 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Continuity Camera is so freaking cool, I wish it fit better into my work About a week ago, I switched on my Canon R6 and went to record something on video. I have the camera hooked up to an Elgato 4K capture card, which my Mac sees as a webcam. However, in this instance, the Elgato was convinced there was no video coming from the camera. The setup has been going for several years now and has worked perfectly, so something has gone wrong. My suspicion is my mini-HDMI to HDMI cable is misbehaving, and I need to order a new one. In the meantime, because even Amazon can't deliver in seconds, I started using Continuity Camera. This is the feature that lets you connect to your iPhone and use it as a webcam. It works wired and wirelessly, and I know people swear by it, but I just haven't given it a shot myself because I already had an overkill setup of my own. But when that setup hits a snag, it's nice to have a fallback that should be easy to do. The great news is that this has worked swimmingly for me, and I've actually used it to record this week's upcoming Comfort Zone episode as well as some other video stuff I needed to do. I used my iPhone 17 Pro and it connected magically and the video itself was very high quality and low latency, even when connected wirelessly. For peace of mind, I have run a long USB-C cable from my Thunderbolt dock to the phone just to make sure I am never surprised by a low battery or dropped wireless connection, but it's been rock solid. Even going for hours at a time, my phone didn't warm up at all, which was a bit of a surprise to me. The other thing I wasn't expecting at all, but works shockingly great, is that the video is always perfectly level. It's actually kind of crazy. No matter how you're holding the phone, even if it's completely vertical, the video will be perfectly level 16x9 widescreen. This is low key the coolest thing here. The big downside for me, and anyone who works from home, is that this feature only works between devices signed into the same Apple account. I can use this for YouTube and for Comfort Zone, but I can't use it for work meetings throughout the week because my work Mac is obviously signed into my work Apple account. Every other webcam solution out there works fine in this hybrid setup I have, but not this, and that on its own makes Continuity Camera unfortunately a dud for me. For what it's worth, I don't think there's an easy solution here, as I don't think any random phone around you should be able to be turned into a webcam in an instant. But I also think it's a great example of why I think "dumb" technology is still super valuable in the modern era. We should have tech that doesn't have a flippin' clue what it's plugged into, it just does a job. Personally, I want this for as many peripherals as possible in my desk setup, and I'm honestly in a pretty good place here. My keyboard, mouse, display, audio interface, speakers, and camera setup all don't care what they're plugged into, they just work. They all have some level of software running on them, but they're so universal that I can almost guarantee that whatever computer I'm using 10 years from now will still work fine with all of these peripherals. Anyway, if you have a work setup that is aligned with how Continuity Camera works, then I think it's really an awesome solution. Doubly so if you have an old or alternate iPhone laying around that you can use.

About a week ago, I switched on my Canon R6 and went to record something on video. I have the camera hooked up to an Elgato 4K capture card, which my Mac sees as a webcam. However, in this instance, the Elgato was convinced there was no video coming from the camera. The setup has been going for […]

02.03.2026 22:00 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
The M4 iPad Air: an update so small, the Bluetooth version gets a shout out In addition to the new iPhone 17E, Apple also announced a new iPad Air, now powered by the M4 processor. I could almost end the post there because we've basically reached the end of the list of differences. As far as I can tell, the literal only other changes are that we now get Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6, and you know the updates are sparse when I'm telling you about the Bluetooth version bump. What's notable about this time is that this is actually the second year in a row where I've basically been able to say the same thing. Last year's M3 iPad Air was also just a processor swap over the M2 version. I'm not super annoyed by this, as the iPad Air is already quite good. But there are two things I think really could have used a change. 1. The 128GB base storage is not great for a premium tablet like this. We saw Apple bump their budget iPhone up to 256GB base storage today, so why not their second-highest end iPad? 2. The 60Hz display is getting pretty damn long in the tooth. It's _fiiiiine_ , but at some point it's time to get an upgrade. The Air has had the literal exact screen for 7 years now. For some context, when we got this display in the Air, the latest iPhone on the market was the XS, you were probably still working in an office 5 days a week, and a global pandemic was a whole year away. Anyway, it seems all right enough. But in my opinion, if you can get an M2 or M3 Air for a significant discount, I would highly look into that. * * * As I did with the iPhone 17e, I'm also comparing my takeaways from what Apple thinks are the highlights on their marketing page: 1. M4 (it's faster) 2. iPadOS (it's the same as before) 3. Apple Intelligence (it's the same as before) 4. Works with the Magic Keyboard (it's the same as before) 5. Available in 11 and 13-inch models (it's the same as before) Not to put too fine a point on it, but you know it's a minor release when 4 of the 5 highlights have nothing to do with this specific hardware, and one of them is that it comes in 2 sizes.

In addition to the new iPhone 17E, Apple also announced a new iPad Air, now powered by the M4 processor. I could almost end the post there because we've basically reached the end of the list of differences. As far as I can tell, the literal only other changes are that we now get Wi-Fi 7 and […]

02.03.2026 14:58 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
The iPhone 17e Last year I was among the more positive people about the iPhone 16e. I spent a couple weeks using it as my primary device, and honestly, it was a pretty fine experience. No, it wasn't as good as my 16 Pro at the time, but it was also half the cost of that phone. I didn't think it was a cutting-edge device, but again, it was not sold at a cutting-edge price. The single camera was kind of annoying, although it must be said that people love the iPhone Air, which has a single camera setup, so it doesn't seem like that's a deal breaker. The 60Hz display was a bummer as well, although at the time, a $1,000 iPhone 16 Plus didn't have that either, so no one was really expecting it on this model. The one thing that really did bum me out was the lack of MagSafe, which felt like a core iPhone feature that we'd gotten used to on five generations of iPhones. Just one year later, Apple's back with a new model, the iPhone 17e. It's a very conservative update, but here's what I think is notable. 1. MagSafe has been added, although it does have slower charging speeds than the other iPhones in the lineup (but it does equal the iPhone 15 and 15 Pro lineup, so not too far behind). 2. Base storage is 256GB (from 128GB in the 16e), which is fantastic. 128GB works, but 256GB is a great starting point. 3. The new "Fusion camera system" looks like it adopts the features high end iPhones have gotten recently to adjust focus in portrait photos after the fact, although photographic styles are still baked in. Based on Apple's compare page, it looks like this might be the exact camera that's in the iPhone Air. 4. The A19 is here, and just like last year, this is the same as the chip in the standard iPhone, but with one fewer GPU core. With the exception of Ceramic Shield 2 on the front glass, everything else is exactly the same. It's the same dimensions, the same wireless modems, the same display tech, and the same advertised battery life. I have no interest in getting one of these this year, but I do think that the upgrades, particularly to the camera, the base storage, and the addition of MagSafe make this an easier pill to swallow at the $599 price point. * * * In my Apple Report Card for last year, I made a prediction about the 17e: > And I would expect the iPhone 17e to be the first iPhone we get in the year, coming in the spring and sporting the A19 processor, MagSafe, and the same design as the current model. Criticisms will remain, the base storage will stay at 128GB, the colors will stay the same, and the $599 price point will be a bit too much for people. Considering a lot of pundits didn't think we were going to get an update every year to this phone, I'll take the point for predicting that we would get this and that it would be the first new iPhone of the year. Everything else was spot on, with the exception of the base storage, which I didn't expect to increase. But hey, if I'm going to get a prediction wrong, I'm happy to have it be in the consumer's favor. * * * One thing that I think is interesting to do is to compare what I think is notable about the new phone to what Apple thinks is notable about the new device. I wrote the above section after pretty much just browsing the iPhone compare page on Apple's site. But if we look at Apple's marketing, what are they bragging about knowing about this phone? I'm using the "Get the highlights" section, which is something they've added to most of their device pages in recent years. 1. Ceramic Shield 2 (it's more durable) 2. MagSafe (it's more convenient) 3. New Fusion Camera (it's a great camera) 4. A19 (it's faster) 5. Apple Intelligence (it's smart(?)) When I read this, I see Apple stressing the reliability and convenience of this phone. It will stand up to more abuse, MagSafe makes it more convenient to use with mounts and other accessories, and it has more performance in the processor and the camera, so you won't feel the need to update for a long time.

Last year I was among the more positive people about the iPhone 16e. I spent a couple weeks using it as my primary device, and honestly, it was a pretty fine experience. No, it wasn't as good as my 16 Pro at the time, but it was also half the cost of that phone. I didn't think it was a […]

02.03.2026 14:42 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Announcing Weave, a native iOS app for Typefully I'm happy to announce the release of my new app, Weave. As is often the case with my apps, I built this one for myself and then decided it was worth sharing with the world. Weave is a native iPhone and iPad app for Typefully users. For those who don't know, Typefully is a web service that lets you cross-post to different social media accounts, and I think it's really great. However, they only have a web interface, they don't have a native iPhone or iPad app. Typefully does have an API, though, and it's pretty simple to use, so I put together a native app that lets you link to your Typefully account and publish however you like. Just go to your Typefully settings, create an API key, put it in Weave, and you're good to go. I've tried to replicate pretty much all of the Typefully web experience, including a nice post editor that makes creating threads really easy. Weave supports media attachments with alt text, scheduling, queuing, posting to specific subsets of accounts, multiple profiles, and editing your scheduled posts. I'm also really proud of the natural language input, which is what I typically use for scheduling. And, hey, if you don't like the green accent color, I also have a Typefully blue theme you can switch to. Again, the app is called Weave, and it's completely free on the App Store. If you're a Typefully user who uses an iPhone, I highly recommend checking it out.

I'm happy to announce the release of my new app, Weave. As is often the case with my apps, I built this one for myself and then decided it was worth sharing with the world. Weave is a native iPhone and iPad app for Typefully users.

For those who don't know, Typefully is a web service that lets […]

02.03.2026 13:55 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Why killing iPadOS isn't what you think it is In the second episode of the A Better Computer podcast, I talk more about how I think "killing iPadOS" is actually making everything more like an iPad. We look at why, from a developer's perspective, there's already literally no difference between iPadOS and iOS software. And then I give a quick update on my ROG Xbox Ally X, which is now running Linux and is so much better than it was when it was running Windows. Watch on YouTube, or listen in your favorite app.

In the second episode of the A Better Computer podcast, I talk more about how I think "killing iPadOS" is actually making everything more like an iPad. We look at why, from a developer's perspective, there's already literally no difference between iPadOS and iOS software. And then I give a quick […]

02.03.2026 13:48 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
Micro app 11: JXR to JPG converter Resident Evil Requiem came out this past week, and I was very excited to start playing it. It genuinely might be my most anticipated game of the year, and I truly relish my first time playing through any Resident Evil game, so I'm trying to really enjoy myself this first playthrough. I'm playing on PC and in HDR, and the game looks absolutely outstanding. Anyway, because I'm playing in HDR, whenever I take a screenshot, we immediately run into a bit of a tricky situation with file formats. When I take a screenshot while playing in SDR, the image format is a simple PNG, which I can easily get onto my Mac and either share directly or convert it to a JPEG. However, when playing in HDR, to capture the high dynamic range of the image, a JXR is captured, which is not a format you may have even come across. In fact, it seems almost no one has, because most apps, and as far as I can tell, nothing really on macOS can even open them in the first place. Truly, I've googled around and searched the App Store for options, and there doesn't seem to be anything really good. This app has got to be the most lazily created app I've made so far, but I don't need it to be complicated at all. All it does is let me drag in my JXR files. I select a destination, I hit convert, it then goes ahead and processes every file, it normalizes the color to SDR color space, and it saves the resulting image as a JPEG. That's really it, there's no other UI, there's no settings, but it does mean that I can post stuff like this to social media, showing off the game. > Post by @matt_birchler@mastodon.social View on Mastodon Without getting too in the weeds, I'm doing this by dropping in the jxrlib library to the project to use its `jxr_decode_to_rgb()` function to convert the image into RGB data, which is then used by some pretty pedestrian Swift code to wrap that in a `CGImage` and export to disk as the file format of my choice. In theory, I could maintain the HDR data by saving the file as HEIC, so I'll probably do that next. _I don't currently have plans to make this available publicly._

Resident Evil Requiem came out this past week, and I was very excited to start playing it. It genuinely might be my most anticipated game of the year, and I truly relish my first time playing through any Resident Evil game, so I'm trying to really enjoy myself this first playthrough. I'm playing […]

02.03.2026 13:00 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Daft Punk & Stevie Wonder & Pharrell & Nile Rogers get lucky I don't have anything to say other than you're welcome for finding the best 5 minutes of YouTube you'll see today.

I don't have anything to say other than you're welcome for finding the best 5 minutes of YouTube you'll see today.

28.02.2026 12:55 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0
Anthropic does the bare minimum, but these days that's impressive Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War > The Department of War has stated they will only contract with AI companies who accede to “any lawful use” and remove safeguards in the cases mentioned above. They have threatened to remove us from their systems if we maintain these safeguards; they have also threatened to designate us a “supply chain risk”—a label reserved for US adversaries, never before applied to an American company—and to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards’ removal. These latter two threats are inherently contradictory: one labels us a security risk; the other labels Claude as essential to national security. It's amazing to see how in every arena, as soon as you resist the All Powerful Trump Administration, you're labeled an enemy of America.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War

The Department of War has stated they will only contract with AI companies who accede to “any lawful use” and remove safeguards in the cases mentioned above. They have threatened to remove us […]

27.02.2026 23:00 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Blender for the iPad is on hold (it was also keyboard+mouse first, not touch first) In a GitHub comment back in January, Blender's Dalai Felinto gave this update on the Blender for iPad project: > FYI I just updated the task description to mention that this project is on hold. > > […] we are putting this project on hold for now. The team will instead focus on the Android tablets first instead. Then just minutes ago, he replied to those asking what caused the change: > Hi, the simple answer is lack of funding that we could comfortably dedicate to this project. It is definitively a strategic target and something we want to pursuit. But we could not secure the funding required last year to work on this in 2026. > > On the flip-side android support development will start this year. And some of the work will also benefit the future iPad implementation. I have no visibility into the company, but my guess is that this is a case where they thought it would be cool, thought there was a market for it, and once they got down to prioritizing everything they wanted to do in 2026, it simply fell below the line. Looking at the GitHub page a bit more, this from the MVP section stood out to me as well: > Bare-minimum requirements to get initial feedback from Apple on technical feasibility of the app. Assume mouse and keyboard, don't bother with touch. As did this similar phrasing from a bit further down: > Target the iPad Pro, treat it as a laptop. Assumes a keyboard and trackpad, no touch is considered. Finally, right at the end, they had plans to implement non-Pro iPads: > Find an efficient way of working with the most constraints (iPad Mini on portrait mode without keyboard/mouse). This is a project on its own. It will have its own dedicated task once we get closer to it. I think it's very interesting that this example of pro software on the iPad was first and foremost going to be assuming the user had a keyboard and mouse, with touch input as a much later step in the development process. I'm not saying there's anything horribly wrong with this strategy, but as someone deep in the "iPadOS and macOS apps aren't that different" camp, it's notable to see an app like this explicitly state that the primary use case for their iPad app is a mouse and keyboard.

In a GitHub comment back in January, Blender's Dalai Felinto gave this update on the Blender for iPad project:

FYI I just updated the task description to mention that this project is on hold.

[…] we are putting this project on hold for now. The team will instead focus on the Android tablets […]

27.02.2026 14:16 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Soon, everything will be an iPad Over the weekend, my Apple will kill iPadOS article caused some feelings, to say the least. The post title was meant to catch eyes, and it did, but I also think that it brought people into the article with the wrong energy. They were ready to fight, and read my (admittedly hastily written) post ready to disagree with it. I'll talk more about this on episode 2 of the new pod, but I wanted to say that "Soon, everything will be an iPad" would have been an equally valid title for the exact same thing I wrote. Not only would the iPad UI be available to people using iPads already, but it would also be coming to the iPhone Fold, and Mac users would get the iPad Pro-style tablet hardware they've been jealous of for years, just running their OS of choice. _I did sour this part of the message by suggesting the iPad Pro hardware would only continue with macOS as an option and that the new windowing features from last year would maybe be removed…my bad on that one._ The difference between iOS and iPadOS is basically a bunch of feature flags in the software, after all, so it's more of a matter of marketing than anything else. Did you know that in Apple's developer apps, it's all referred to as "iOS" already? Or did you know that you distribute an "iOS" and a "macOS" build of your app, but there is no option to distribute an "iPadOS" app? Apps can run only on the iPad if the dev wants, but it's still an "iOS" app. And honestly, the flagship iPhone run the same OS as iPads could be the best thing to every happen to the iPad software experience. No more off years or wondering if Apple still cares about you…nope, when their most important product runs your OS, suddenly the OS on your iPad is Apple's most important OS. What a gift! Anyway, I didn't mean to suggest Apple was merging iPadOS and macOS, nor was I trying to say that Apple was giving up on iPads in any way shape or form.

Over the weekend, my Apple will kill iPadOS article caused some feelings, to say the least. The post title was meant to catch eyes, and it did, but I also think that it brought people into the article with the wrong energy. They were ready to fight, and read my (admittedly hastily written) post […]

27.02.2026 00:11 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Block is making more profit than ever, so they're firing 40% of their employees Jack Dorsey on Twitter: we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. > we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. Apparently also laid off today was his shift key. Hearing you're getting axed by your CEO on social media typing _wike a widdle liddle babi_ is a very 2026 feeling. Of course, I quoted the part about how they're doing better than ever, and that's why they need to let people go. Classic. Of course, I had to look at the replies, and of course there was a gem near the top: > This is the elon firing 80% of Twitter moment. The whole world saw, in real time, that it had literally 0 negative impact on the product and the user experience. Hear that, "literally 0 negative impact on the product and the user experience" apparently! Let's all go back, everyone, it's a great experience like it always was! Of course, this from some dipshit who creates AI summaries over AI videos of classic books as their social media "content". Ah, the pride in being a human powered slop machine. Anyway, the severance deal seems good, so that's something. I'm just really tired of execs, who's every monetary need is satisfied, go in front of their employees and saying, "things have never been better, and that's why we need to let a bunch of you go."

Jack Dorsey on Twitter: we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company.

we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving.

Apparently […]

26.02.2026 23:00 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Drive to Survive is coming to Apple TV tonight Chance Miller: New ‘F1: Drive to Survive’ season is coming to Apple TV > Ahead of the first F1 Grand Prix next week, Apple has announced a new partnership with Netflix in the US. Through this deal, Apple will make the entire new season (season eight) of Formula 1: Drive to Survive available on Apple TV. Well that's a nice surprise!

Chance Miller: New ‘F1: Drive to Survive’ season is coming to Apple TV

Ahead of the first F1 Grand Prix next week, Apple has announced a new partnership with Netflix in the US. Through this deal, Apple will make the entire new season (season eight) of Formula 1: Drive to Survive available on […]

26.02.2026 22:18 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
The whole draw of the Mac is that it can do whatever you want it to do Wesley Hilliard has a new post out which is a bit of a retort to my opinion on touch Macs and iPads: Apple could enter its toaster-fridge era with touchscreen MacBooks > It's not that I think it's a bad idea, it's just an odd one. macOS was not originally designed for touch, and MacBooks have notably thin lids that could be compromised by touch technology. > > If Apple can deliver a touch panel without negative effects to the MacBook design, then sure, go for it. And: > That said, this isn't iPadOS either. These MacBook displays are not touch-first and never will be. They also won't have Apple Pencil support and likely never will. As I feel like I've said over and over again on this blog, we continually hear about what features one platform or another is or isn't supposed to have. Then Apple adds that feature, everybody likes it, and we pretend like we didn't argue against that existing before. I've had literally these exact same debates with people who thought that the iPad should not get a mouse cursor because that was a Mac thing. I also think it's worth noting that while people love to bust out the "NO" slide or the "toaster and a refrigerator" Tim Cook quote or the ergonomics concern, I will point out this still from the iPad introduction: 16 years later, that exact use case is literally given full screen marketing on Apple's website. Not only are people using their iPad in a laptop form factor, Apple has several accessories that turn your iPad into a laptop and they had to move the camera to work in landscape because so many people were doing it. I genuinely believe that if Apple pundits think that combining direct and indirect input methods on the Mac is such a bad idea, they should direct an equal amount of disdain towards Apple for doing this in the iPad. The iPad is already the nightmare combination they fear, and they're not mad about it because actually it's a really great experience. Hilliard also mentions that adding a capacitive layer to the MacBook Pro screen could compromise its thinness. I'm not sure that's a big issue, but even if it is, I should say again that a clamshell Mac with a touch screen is not the dream Mac I've been waiting for all these years. What I want is the iPad Pro hardware running macOS, complete with the freedom to attach a keyboard when I need it. Also, if I can be pedantic, the Mac is fundamentally a toaster, a refrigerator, a coffee maker, a mixer, and salad spinner…it's flexible…it's everything you want it to be. It's literally the reason people like me are so in love with it. > And no, Matt Birchler, Apple is not going to kill iPadOS. I'm glad to know we read each other ❤️. I'll have a follow up post on this topic soon enough, don't worry! * * * Anyway, I can't wait for Apple to release Macs with touch, for it to make some people happy and no one unhappy, and for us all to pretend that we didn't dogmatically believe that touch on the Mac would be terrible. Just like we pretend we didn't say the same thing about "the iPad wasn’t supposed to have a file manager until it got one, the iPad wasn’t supposed to be used with a mouse and keyboard until it did, the iPad wasn’t supposed to have overlapping windows until it did."

Wesley Hilliard has a new post out which is a bit of a retort to my opinion on touch Macs and iPads: Apple could enter its toaster-fridge era with touchscreen MacBooks

It's not that I think it's a bad idea, it's just an odd one. macOS was not originally designed for touch, and MacBooks have […]

25.02.2026 19:27 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
In blind test, gamers think DLSS looks better than native rendering Hassam Nasir: Nearly half of PC gamers prefer DLSS 4.5 over AMD's FSR and even native rendering (emphasis mine) > German outlet ComputerBase has conducted a blind test comparing the image quality of six games across different rendering techniques. The main showdown was between Nvidia's latest DLSS 4.5 and AMD's latest FSR 4 (Redstone) technologies, going up against native rendering using TAA. **After the votes were tallied, DLSS walked away with a clear and dominant victory** , scoring 48.2% of all votes. This will have to be a podcast topic, but this study doesn’t surprise me at all. The PC gaming community online has been (IMO) bizarrely opposed to this technology, despite analytics showing most people with NVIDIA GPUs enable DLSS when it's available and now in blind tests, actually prefer DLSS image quality over native rendering with TAA. It wasn't part of the test, but it's also worth saying that not only did users prefer the DLSS image in terms of quality, they would have also enjoyed playing the games more because their frame rates were higher, and because of that frame rate increase, the games' input latency would be faster as well. So better image quality, better frame rates, and better input latency, and still some gamers thumb their nose at this tech. For the past year, this video from Linus Tech Tips has been living rent-free in my head. Around the 7 minute mark, Linus and I'm sorry, I don't know the other guy's name, are playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider and are pointing out countless flaws in the picture quality, and the "guy whose name I don't know" really lays it on thick as this being the reason he can't use DLSS. Moments later, they venture to the game's video settings menu and realize they didn't even have DLSS on…their complaints were about native rendering. For his part, Linus has seemed to come around on DLSS and frame generation in the past year, but situations like this seem all too common.

Hassam Nasir: Nearly half of PC gamers prefer DLSS 4.5 over AMD's FSR and even native rendering (emphasis mine)

German outlet ComputerBase has conducted a blind test comparing the image quality of six games across different rendering techniques. The main showdown was between Nvidia's latest […]

25.02.2026 13:00 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Seeing growth on YouTube I love Rory Alexander's YouYube channel. He streams Gran Turismo for a living and posts a video or two per week that I always enjoy. On my YouTube home feed today I saw this video from 3 years ago: What I find striking about it is how much different it is from his current videos. Hre's a random example of a recent video from the last couple weeks for comparison: I think it's remarkable how much more engaging he is and how much more confident he is on camera. It's only been a couple years, but the transformation is really impressive and I think he still does it with a high amount of class. I highly recommend Rory's channel if you're into racing.

I love Rory Alexander's YouYube channel. He streams Gran Turismo for a living and posts a video or two per week that I always enjoy. On my YouTube home feed today I saw this video from 3 years ago:

What I find striking about it is how much different it is from his current videos. Hre's a random […]

25.02.2026 02:16 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0