Jose Vilson, PhD's Avatar

Jose Vilson, PhD

@thejosevilson.com

The educator Gotham deserves. @educolor.org ED. Sociologist (with policy!), studying teacher professionalism and work, former NYC math teacher, best-selling author of This Is Not A Test. Join the movement πŸ‘‡πŸΎ thejosevilson.com/newsletter

7,842
Followers
912
Following
2,923
Posts
03.11.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Jose Vilson, PhD @thejosevilson.com

Preview
a man wearing ear buds is sitting at a table Alt: a man wearing ear buds is sitting at a table crying and yelling
09.03.2026 17:33 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

The word β€œsimplify” has always been weird to me, too, yes. Thanks for this.

09.03.2026 02:39 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I was definitely referring to that, too!

09.03.2026 00:34 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Ironically, that new math isn’t all that new, but don’t mind me. I’m neck deep in research on some of this stuff. πŸ€“

09.03.2026 00:17 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you for sharing that as that's part of the work as well.

FWIW, I failed Calc II the first time. I took it again and passed because different professor and different perspective.

08.03.2026 17:36 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

"Liberalism" or whatever.

08.03.2026 17:33 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

See how … smh. Thank you for sharing!

08.03.2026 17:27 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Yeeaaahhhhhhhhh same.

08.03.2026 17:25 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Both of these comments, yes.

08.03.2026 16:38 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Agreed. That’s where Alg2 starts losing the argument for me.

08.03.2026 16:38 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Wow. Thank you for the vulnerability here.

08.03.2026 02:05 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Copy!

08.03.2026 01:54 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Oh?

08.03.2026 01:50 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The area model is clutch and it’s sad that I wasn’t taught it as a kid. πŸ˜‚

08.03.2026 01:42 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Listen, same. Long division is super helpful with polynomial division but division as a procedure is convoluted.

08.03.2026 01:41 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you!

08.03.2026 01:12 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

The latter part, yes.

08.03.2026 01:08 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Or even FFTDFM :-)

08.03.2026 01:08 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah you need the right explanation for this to work too. Otherwise, it's just "do as I say ..."

08.03.2026 01:07 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

YEP!

08.03.2026 01:06 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Agreed here!

08.03.2026 01:06 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

FWIW, that's one of the first things I tackled in my forthcoming book :-)

08.03.2026 01:06 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Mmhmmmm. It's supposed to make things easier, but people don't take time to help us understand what it accomplishes.

08.03.2026 01:05 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Here, I was expecting another F-word, but I'll take it.

08.03.2026 01:05 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks for elevating this. My notifications got a little action today. πŸ˜πŸ˜…

08.03.2026 01:03 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Mmmmhmmmm. And really, the formulas shouldn't matter as much as what we do with them and how we got them.

08.03.2026 01:02 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Actually, yes to this. I get *why* we do proofs, but the logic can be difficult if you're not steeped in the axioms.

08.03.2026 01:01 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

That's ultimately at the heart of what I'm seeing with respect to the struggles people are sharing with me.

08.03.2026 00:59 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, I'm not sure what synthetic division is supposed to accomplish that long division of polynomials doesn't already do (though I do get it from an efficiency standpoint).

Thanks for being mad nevertheless! πŸ˜…

08.03.2026 00:58 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you!

07.03.2026 15:50 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 5