Adapted from Axelsson et al. 2013 Fig 2c: Histogram showing the distribution of diploid amylase copy number in wolf (n=35, blue) and dog (n=136, red). Dogs carry more copies of the starch-digesting gene AMY2B than wolves. Additional copies make dogs better than wolves at digesting starchy foods like grains & vegetables.
Dogs evolved to eat your leftovers! Comparing dog & wolf genomes revealed dogs have up to 30 EXTRA copies of the amylase gene (AMY2B) that helps digest starch. This is a key genomic signature of living alongside humans & table scraps for thousands of years π www.nature.com/articles/nat... #2026MMM
13.03.2026 01:25
π 454
π 146
π¬ 9
π 24
A single course of antibiotics can have lasting effects on your gut microbiome, with changes that last well beyond 4 years. Three types of antibiotics stood out for their long term disruptive impact (3 at left, Figure)
nature.com/articles/s41...
11.03.2026 17:04
π 241
π 96
π¬ 12
π 8
Validate User
Positive selection targeted primate genes that encode transposable element repressors academic.oup.com/gbe/article/...
10.03.2026 09:26
π 5
π 6
π¬ 0
π 0
New post, on whether I could get Claude Code to complete a data task that had taken me AGES a decade agoβ¦
kucharski.substack.com/p/how-much-t...
08.03.2026 08:09
π 128
π 43
π¬ 5
π 6
This is amazing.
www.getyourfuckingmoneyback.com
27.02.2026 17:49
π 37075
π 11966
π¬ 500
π 797
Genomic Perplexity and the Evolution of Context-Dependent Function
Abstract. The fundamental principle that selection acts on a geneβs function often assumes implicitly that this function is fixed and intrinsic. However, e
New paper out in MBE! π§΅
"Genomic Perplexity and the Evolution of Context-Dependent Function"
The big idea: genes don't have fixed functions. Function emerges from context - genomic, cellular, environmental. And we can quantify this. academic.oup.com/mbe/article/...
27.02.2026 10:45
π 61
π 17
π¬ 3
π 0
New Preprint π’ from our team π Critical assessment of #intratumor and #low #biomass #microbiome using #longread sequencing
Some studies suggest bacteria π¦ live inside tumors and influence cancer treatment. But thereβs also been a major #debate: in these veryβ low-microbe tissue samples, how much 1/
05.02.2026 13:15
π 42
π 19
π¬ 2
π 0
Second paper from MRes (!!) student Caitlin Duggan; #AMR mechanisms and the challenges of actually measuring and defining what is "resistant", deep dive into #cefiderocol susceptibility testing & resistance mutations
#MicroSky #IDSky π»π§¬ #MicrobiomeSky
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
28.01.2026 09:25
π 2
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
Congrats to @carolinamicro.bsky.social for leading this study! We looked at genome rearrangements over short evolutionary timescales. Among other things, we found that genomes are highly syntenic within most species. However, several bacteria experienced sudden and massive genome rearrangements.
27.01.2026 15:09
π 14
π 6
π¬ 0
π 0
We just released #anvio v9, "eunice" π
This version represents over 2,000 changes in the codebase since v8, increasing the total number of programs in the anvi'o ecosystem to 176.
Read the release notes:
github.com/merenlab/anv...
Visit our up-to-date web page:
anvio.org
20.01.2026 11:48
π 71
π 34
π¬ 2
π 3
Enterococcus fans: Check out our latest on E. faecalis EET, advancing our understanding of both the fundamental physiology of this bug and new mechanisms of its virulence. This is the product of a thrilling collaboration with friends in Singapore @gthibault.bsky.social led by @aarontan.bsky.social.
17.01.2026 05:57
π 51
π 24
π¬ 1
π 2
With this regime anything is possibleβ¦
04.01.2026 05:39
π 9598
π 2375
π¬ 284
π 154
Multiple large natural experiments have documented Shingles vaccine is linked with ~20-25% reduced risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease. A new report today adds to that and extends the to slowing the progression of dementia @cellcellpress.bsky.social
www.cell.com/cell/fulltex...
02.12.2025 16:00
π 682
π 295
π¬ 17
π 41
Intracellular competition shapes plasmid population dynamics
From populations of multicellular organisms to selfish genetic elements, conflicts between levels of biological organization are central to evolution. Plasmids are extrachromosomal, self-replicating g...
Hot off the press! Our latest paper led by @fernpizza.bsky.social, understanding how plasmids evolve inside cells. These small, self-replicating DNA circles live inside bacteria and carry antibiotic resistance genes, but also compete with one another to replicate. 1/
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
20.11.2025 21:42
π 437
π 199
π¬ 11
π 18
A table showing profit margins of major publishers. A snippet of text related to this table is below.
1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.
A figure detailing the drain on researcher time.
1. The four-fold drain
1.2 Time
The number of papers published each year is growing faster than the scientific workforce,
with the number of papers per researcher almost doubling between 1996 and 2022 (Figure
1A). This reflects the fact that publishersβ commercial desire to publish (sell) more material
has aligned well with the competitive prestige culture in which publications help secure jobs,
grants, promotions, and awards. To the extent that this growth is driven by a pressure for
profit, rather than scholarly imperatives, it distorts the way researchers spend their time.
The publishing system depends on unpaid reviewer labour, estimated to be over 130 million
unpaid hours annually in 2020 alone (9). Researchers have complained about the demands of
peer-review for decades, but the scale of the problem is now worse, with editors reporting
widespread difficulties recruiting reviewers. The growth in publications involves not only the
authorsβ time, but that of academic editors and reviewers who are dealing with so many
review demands.
Even more seriously, the imperative to produce ever more articles reshapes the nature of
scientific inquiry. Evidence across multiple fields shows that more papers result in
βossificationβ, not new ideas (10). It may seem paradoxical that more papers can slow
progress until one considers how it affects researchersβ time. While rewards remain tied to
volume, prestige, and impact of publications, researchers will be nudged away from riskier,
local, interdisciplinary, and long-term work. The result is a treadmill of constant activity with
limited progress whereas core scholarly practices β such as reading, reflecting and engaging
with othersβ contributions β is de-prioritized. What looks like productivity often masks
intellectual exhaustion built on a demoralizing, narrowing scientific vision.
A table of profit margins across industries. The section of text related to this table is below:
1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.
The costs of inaction are plain: wasted public funds, lost researcher time, compromised
scientific integrity and eroded public trust. Today, the system rewards commercial publishers
first, and science second. Without bold action from the funders we risk continuing to pour
resources into a system that prioritizes profit over the advancement of scientific knowledge.
We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing:
a π§΅ 1/n
Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820
Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
11.11.2025 11:52
π 643
π 453
π¬ 8
π 66
A joke scientific paper with the title "Over 90% of children diagnosed with autism consumed breast milk and/or formula mileL a comprehensive cross-sectional analysis of the obvious"
Who did this?!
01.11.2025 20:38
π 1205
π 315
π¬ 69
π 40
Index zone by BenLangmead
October 2025 batch of Kraken 2 indexes, including core_nt and many others, available: benlangmead.github.io/aws-indexes/k2
Coming soon to K2: a feature for querying many K2 indexes as though they're a single index. Highly useful if the index you want to query is too big to build and/or fit in RAM.
30.10.2025 18:11
π 21
π 8
π¬ 2
π 0
Napoleon's retreat from Moscow CREDIT Barbieri et al., Current Biology
DNA from Napoleonβs 1812 army identifies the pathogens likely responsible for the armyβs demise during their Russian retreat. www.cell.com/current-biol...
NicolaΜs Rascovan & colleagues
@currentbiology.bsky.social
24.10.2025 15:00
π 66
π 22
π¬ 4
π 7
Around 10% of your Nanopore reads (SQK-RBK114) are incorrectly trimmed. Here is why, and how our new tool Barbell solves it:
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Want to get started? github.com/rickbeeloo/b...
23.10.2025 20:16
π 51
π 31
π¬ 3
π 4
Really exciting that the preprint on Barbell, a new demultiplexer, is finally out!
It's the first tool that builds on Sassy, the approximate-DNA-searching tool that @rickbitloo.bsky.social and myself developed earlier this year, specifically with this application in mind.
23.10.2025 21:28
π 20
π 15
π¬ 2
π 0
GTDB release 10: a complete and systematic taxonomy for 715Β 230 bacterial and 17Β 245 archaeal genomes
Abstract. The Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB; https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org) provides a phylogenetically consistent and rank normalized genome-based taxonomy
Our @narjournal.bsky.social manuscript is out! It explores the growth of the GTDB (gtdb.ecogenomic.org) since its inception, as well as updates to the website, methodology, policies, and major taxonomic and nomenclatural changes over the past three years.
academic.oup.com/nar/advance-...
22.10.2025 14:20
π 69
π 46
π¬ 0
π 2
A randomized phase 1 study investigating gut microbiome changes with moxifloxacin vs. oral vancomycin: Implications for Clostridioides difficile risk
AbstractBackground. The epidemic, hypervirulent Clostridioides difficile ribotype (RT) 027 strain is associated with bacterial virulence traits, including
At first seems like comparing apples and oranges: moxifloxacin vs vancomycin?!
Results a bit surprising ("narrow spectrum" vancomycin change microbiome more), but this is just helicopter view.
More broadly, π to these experimental medicine approaches for discovery science
#IDSky #ClinMicro #AMR
19.10.2025 14:18
π 5
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0