Does political money flow like water? Does it go over, under, and around obstacles placed in its way?
10.03.2026 13:02
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Does political money flow like water? Does it go over, under, and around obstacles placed in its way?
The Constitution says that someone who has taken an oath to support the Constitution but who then engaged in insurrection cannot take office again without a special dispensation from Congress. Mr. Trump never got that dispensation. Therefore, he is not president.
How much more evidence do we need? The ultra-rich and the governments supporting them will destroy everything for the sake of profit, power and pride. Nothing is precious to them - not human life, not the living world - except their own wealth and status. Our survival depends on resisting them.
Ziohazard.
Substitute "LGB" for "LGBTQ+".
Add "Also, I need you to support equality in voting. Someone who opposes Trumpism should have as much political power as someone who supports it."
In States that don't have initiative and referendum, it would be possible to push Approval Voting by making support of it a condition of giving money to campaigns for the state legislatures.
Approval Voting was enacted for some municipal elections in Fargo, ND and in St. Louis. In one of those cases, it was quashed by the state legislature. With enough support, it could be enacted in States that have initiative and referendum. 1/
Why is it that when an article is published stating that a new candidate has thrown her hat into the ring, so to speak, the reporting takes care to mention how much money support the new candidate has? Is it because the voters care about that?
Edit to include impeachment of Trump as well: actionnetwork.org/letters/proj...
What if there were another way, besides trying to regulate money, whereby it could be decoupled from having much effect on electoral outcomes?
The people should force the US officials (or those pretending to be) to stop fighting. Sufficient diplomacy was already achieved when both countries signed the NPT.
Wouldn't it be nice to be able to vote against the so-called "Republicans" without at the same time voting just as hard against Greens and socialists?
Congress is required to do that, but they are majority traitors in each chamber.
why did Kamala Harris lose?
Because she SUCKS
Wouldn't it be nice if we could vote against all the so-called
"Republicans" without simultaneously voting just as hard against all the Greens and socialists?
The people who live in the US have adequate grounds to institute a new regime of government. It should be based on democratic republicanism for a change.
Global overheating is a genocide of all the races.
Maybe there's a good candidate among Indigenous women.
Fellow leftists. We need to find and set up a candidate worth voting for in 2028.
Dems, you're gonna do what we've done for you for decades and vote for our candidate without question.
Your way failed. Your way got us here.
It's time for a change.
Everyone should vote, but also, plan what to do when the elections in 26 States are rigged.
Wouldn't it be nice if we could vote against a single candidate in a field of three or more?
This is one of the many adequate grounds for the people who live in the US to institute a new regime, based on democratic republicanism for a change.
I'M TELLING YOU. THERE'S NO DOUBT TRUMP IS FLOATING NUKING IRAN. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD IMPEACH THE MAD MAN IMMEDIATELY. HISTORY IS WATCHING.
I will send money to the campaign that advocates on its website for equal voting, as would meet a test of balance: for every possible vote in the system, there must be a possible vote that exactly balances the effect of the first vote.
