There is no evidence that "trans" means anything other than an advocacy to give bad advice to young people. You're here, but that doesn't mean the word describes you correctly.
Respondents in the US, note that the OP is in the UK context and is advocating for PR.
@awanthaartigala.bsky.social
Doublethink.
There must be an Indigenous woman who would be a good candidate.
That is incorrect. "Trans" people are 0% of the population.
- Money rules, because
- Voters only support money-supported candidates, because
- they are concerned about the power of their vote, because
- they do not have equal power, one voter to another, in their votes.
This can be solved; the people have to push for it, but first, they have to understand.
Repeat daily the message to your Senators to stop this war.
Suggested content: 1787regime.wordpress.com/2026/03/10/u...
Tool to send it: rootsaction.org/no-war-on-iran
Expressing an opinion that the teachings of a named religion contain error is not the same thing as advocating for the extermination of its adherents nor for their exclusion from political office.
If you didn’t voice your opposition to this war, we will hold that against you on Election Day.
If we can’t replace you this time with someone who did, we will continue to try. The primaries will not be kind to you. Ever again.
Does political money flow like water? Does it go over, under, and around obstacles placed in its way?
The Constitution says that someone who has taken an oath to support the Constitution but who then engaged in insurrection cannot take office again without a special dispensation from Congress. Mr. Trump never got that dispensation. Therefore, he is not president.
How much more evidence do we need? The ultra-rich and the governments supporting them will destroy everything for the sake of profit, power and pride. Nothing is precious to them - not human life, not the living world - except their own wealth and status. Our survival depends on resisting them.
Ziohazard.
Substitute "LGB" for "LGBTQ+".
Add "Also, I need you to support equality in voting. Someone who opposes Trumpism should have as much political power as someone who supports it."
In States that don't have initiative and referendum, it would be possible to push Approval Voting by making support of it a condition of giving money to campaigns for the state legislatures.
Approval Voting was enacted for some municipal elections in Fargo, ND and in St. Louis. In one of those cases, it was quashed by the state legislature. With enough support, it could be enacted in States that have initiative and referendum. 1/
Why is it that when an article is published stating that a new candidate has thrown her hat into the ring, so to speak, the reporting takes care to mention how much money support the new candidate has? Is it because the voters care about that?
Edit to include impeachment of Trump as well: actionnetwork.org/letters/proj...
What if there were another way, besides trying to regulate money, whereby it could be decoupled from having much effect on electoral outcomes?
The people should force the US officials (or those pretending to be) to stop fighting. Sufficient diplomacy was already achieved when both countries signed the NPT.
Wouldn't it be nice to be able to vote against the so-called "Republicans" without at the same time voting just as hard against Greens and socialists?
Congress is required to do that, but they are majority traitors in each chamber.
why did Kamala Harris lose?
Because she SUCKS
