My people were/are persecuted for their race. They divide us by race. I’m arguing that there’s more under that surface to why humans oppress others and how race is used as a proxy to gain power
Not ignoring it. Recognizing it as class warfare and how race is used to divide us is how we can begin to address the underlying issues.
Yes there are many overlapping venn circles, good job. We all know that. I’m suggesting we fight against the forces that keep us divided for their own gains. To pretend it’s simply a race issue is naive and helping those in power more than the People.
When you fall for the race divides and not economic disparities you are doing whose work exactly?
No mention of defending basic constitutional rights that are being violated, rather the framing is that the pundits are wrong and moderates are politically moderate? Shocking to the folks on earth. Will the elites step away from their insider trading and war profiteering to notice? Doubtful.
You and the people on this thread are, thankfully, not everyone. In the absence of critical thinking is always more posturing, good job with that 👍
Win what? I’m not a missionary trying to convert anyone. I’m in the minority as you pointed out. I’m outnumbered by billions and you’re here scolding me. The chains of religion have enslaved humanity whether I say that nicely or not. Whether you agree or not. Whether most people agree or not.
And? Believers don’t respect different believers, you think non believers get respect? If we just watched our tone it would be better? You are the juggernaut slowing down evolution so maybe this conversation isn’t about niceties but something much more important
When one can’t argue an intellectual point, it isn’t surprising to find them policing “tone” instead of content. Since I’m not anyone’s daddy in the sky, I couldn’t care less about what triggers those under mass psychosis that are holding humanity back
Absolutely. Obviously less dangerous than a Johnson bc at least their motives are just, but that would be in spite of their religious texts not bc of them. Anyone using religion publicly/politically is dangerous.
Society should stop pandering to the less evolved members of society, like those who need a daddy in the sky to act decently. We should instead push them to grow into full adulthood so their fears & squabbles don’t turn into harm against others. Jesus was not the first or last to have ethics.
We don’t need to move towards religion we need to evolve beyond it. This is regression and you are falling for his oratory skills. Nothing more dangerous to society than a believer with a smooth tongue.
Thieves are being hampered from gorging on the world unrestrained oh no
You remember being a child or ignorant, not a golden time of great politicians. Good job growing up 👍
How about less stupid catchphrases to sell books and just making things people actually want that doesn’t destroy the planet?
Forgiveness for the unforgivable is something religion came up with to whitewash the abuses they inflict. It is morally imperative not to forgive crimes against humanity
Why are we building detention centers?
You do not have to support those who support child rapists and fascists. Not ever. Not under any circumstance. It’s just a goddam game.
No, not everyone needs incentives not to rape or kill or hurt others. You are telling on yourself.
The stats come from the dept of justice, so go argue with them.
You are now arguing men (99% of rapists) need incentives not to rape. This is called rape culture and you’ve embodied it perfectly.
99% of perpetrators are male. 2% are convicted. 80% are known to the victim. (US dept of Justice). Fuck you for making this about maga like it’s some stupid conspiracy against a group. The group is men. Men.
It is not distracting to identify perpetrators and name the patterns. Most rapists are ordinary men who the victims trusted. Those are facts. Justice is equal rights, not protecting “ordinary” men whatever the gaslighting fuck that means.
Oh thank god you’ve mentioned one woman so we don’t have a skewed perspective that the vast majority of sexual crimes are committed by men
Name one advanced physics problem solved
The political effects of X's feed algorithm https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10098-2 Received: 16 December 2024 Accepted: 4 January 2026 Published online: 18 February 2026 Open access • Check for updates Germain Gauthier,5, Roland Hodler?5, Philine Widmer35 & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya3,4,5 m Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects'. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Musk's platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7 weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects. Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed users' feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to X's algorithm has persistent effects on users' current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.
A new paper shows that less than 2 months of exposure to Twitter’s algorithmic feed significantly shifts people’s political views to the right.
Moving from chronological feed to the algorithmic feed also increases engagement.
This is one of the most concerning papers I’ve read in awhile.
The story that Elon Musk committed voter fraud has gotten next to no coverage -- one of those things you can't make come up on a Google search.
But I think it's time for Dems to go on offensive abt right wing coddling of this immigrant interfering in our elections.
newrepublic.com/post/206857/...
Harris +6 not the pedophile
Testosterone is shady af
I can’t believe anyone would call criminals dodging questions as not “curious” Jfc THEY DONT WANT TO FOLLOW LAWS!
It all adds up. And the whole of the Trump Redux evil is greater than the sum of its malignant parts.
There is today a convergence of criminality—every bad thing everywhere all at once: amoral men & women of great means and influence, in league with Epstein & his child sex trafficking network...
