KazzyAnnie1

And they've stated Human Rights for ALL will be an explicit policy - so what's the problem?

So why are you so vitriolic about YP holding exactly the same vote on trans rights as the Green party did? It wouldn't be Green policy if there hadn't been a vote of the membership

So it's NOT about trans rights at all then? It's your personal grudge against one political party and all the others get a free pass. Noted

Have you said the same about the Green Party? They did the same and they currently have two vocal transphobes standing for leadership

It's to do with trans-rights or isn't that what's important?

Iv already stated my position that if the party isn't pro-trans I'll leave - I've been absolutely clear on MY ideology, I just don't hold one party to different standards and give others a free pass

Oh, and Ed Poole, who interviews people who want to stand for the Greens said EXACTLY that yesterday, in fact he made a big deal of the fact that, in his words "it's illegal to expel or ban people for GC views"

So voting for transphobes in a leadership election isn't "allowing racists and transphobes to vote in racist and transphobic policies"? Who do you think nominated those transphobes for the leadership election?

Maybe look in the mirror, you're the one reading things that don't exist!

Yet again you're reading something that isn't even there!

Well you're not calling THEM out for letting transphobes hold so much power in their party are you? Your anger seems very selective

So now you're accusing me of racism? You've seriously lost the plot.

That's your interpretation of it, not the words she actually says

And I answered it

Screenshot

And I asked YOU if you ask the same of a party that has TWO transphobes currently running for leadership. I've made clear where my redlines are

Screenshot proving I did ask this user if she asked the same question about the Green Party

No, I also asked you

Please, point out what makes you think I'm an "FBPE type", let me guess - you've misread my bio (you seem to do that a lot, reading things that aren't actually there) and didn't see it actually says that I won't follow back FBPE and they won't like a lot of what I post

Why so much vitriol for a party that has the same democratic, member-led policy making system and not for the Greens?

You do know the Greens were saying, only yesterday, that it's illegal for them to ban or expel GC members don't you? You do know they've currently got TWO transphobes running for the party leadership don't you?

Please point to where exactly she "clearly says she will not say bigots are not allowed in Your Party"

they have exactly the same "members vote on policy" system AND they have two transphobes actually standing for leadership at the moment!

Because you aren't asking in good faith - I've made quite clear that I won't stay in a party that doesn't have pro-trans policies. You still haven't answered my initial q as to whether you ask the same of Green Party members even though

She's clearly stated that even though some people might see anti-racism or pro-trans as contentious she'll fight as hard as she can for those policies to be in the new party, in a party that is member-led (the same as the Greens) I don't see why she needs to be defended.

They all have been at some point in history. I've made it quite clear where my personal red line is

Please point out where I've said, or even implied, that. Quite the contrary - I've clearly stated that not being pro-trans is a red line for me and I'll leave if they aren't.

I'm not "screaming" about anything I'm pointing out the fact that, unlike all the other political parties other than the Greens, members will be in charge of the party and it's policies NOT the politicians. I've also made it clear I won't stay if they aren't pro-trans.

Do you say the same to Green Party members? They have the very same member led system

And Timms is in charge of the "review" on the PIP cuts for existing claimants - we know exactly what it's going to say don't we? 🤬

And Timms is in charge of the "review" on the PIP cuts for existing claimants - we know exactly what it's going to say don't we? 🤬

And Timms is in charge of the "review" on the PIP cuts for existing claimants - we know exactly what it's going to say don't we? 🤬